ArabelaTso

Interview-based strategic planning for complex software tasks. Conducts structured requirements gathering, gap analysis, and generates detailed work plans before implementation begins.

Summarize long Isabelle or Coq proof scripts into high-level logical steps and reasoning flow. Use when users need to: (1) Understand the structure of a complex proof, (2) Document proof strategies for others, (3) Extract the key reasoning steps from verbose proof scripts, (4) Create readable proof outlines from detailed tactical proofs. Produces hierarchical outlines with moderate detail showing

Generate comprehensive, user-friendly README.md files for code repositories. Use when creating documentation for new projects, updating existing READMEs, or improving project onboarding. Produces READMEs with project introduction, prerequisites, environment setup, executable usage instructions, and repository structure overview. Supports application projects, libraries, and research codebases.

Browser automation via Playwright for web testing, screenshots, form filling, scraping, and verification. Use when tasks require navigating websites, interacting with web pages, or testing web applications.

Generate configuration files for applications, services, and infrastructure. Use when: (1) Setting up new projects (package.json, requirements.txt, tsconfig.json), (2) Creating Docker or Kubernetes configurations, (3) Configuring CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI), (4) Setting up web servers (Nginx, Apache), (5) Defining infrastructure as code (Terraform, CloudFormation), (6) Ge

Update Java test classes and methods to work with new code versions after refactoring or modifications. Use when code changes break existing tests due to signature changes, refactoring, or behavior modifications. Takes old and new code versions plus old tests as input, and outputs updated tests that compile and pass against the new code. Handles method signature changes, class refactoring, asserti

Automatically repair C/C++ code violations detected by TLA+ model checking. Takes a program, TLA+ specification, and TLC counterexample trace as input, then generates minimal code modifications to eliminate the violation. Use when: (1) TLC model checker reports an invariant violation, deadlock, or temporal property failure, (2) You have a counterexample trace and need to fix the corresponding code