tobihagemann

Stage, format, lint, test, review, smoke test, and re-run itself until stable. Use when the user asks to \"polish code\", \"refine code\", \"iterate on code quality\", \"review loop\", \"clean up, test, and review loop\", or \"run the polish loop\".

Create a GitHub pull request with a drafted title and description. Use when the user asks to \"create a PR\", \"create a pull request\", \"open a PR\", or \"submit a PR\".

Run a non-interactive Claude Code print-mode call from Codex. Use when the user asks to \"claude print\", \"ask claude\", \"run claude\", \"consult claude\", or when a Codex Turbo skill needs Claude as an independent peer reviewer.

Review a planning artifact (plan, shells, or spec) by running internal and peer reviews in parallel and returning combined findings. Use when the user asks to \"review my plan\", \"review my shells\", \"review my spec\", \"check my plan\", \"check my shells\", \"check my spec\", \"critique my plan\", \"critique my shells\", \"critique my spec\", or wants feedback on a planning artifact.

Pick the next shell whose dependencies are satisfied and carry it through planning: expand, refine, self-improve, halt. Use when the user asks to \"pick next shell\", \"next shell\", \"continue project\", \"what's next\", \"next implementation step\", or \"continue with the plan\".

Iteratively review and revise a planning artifact until no new findings survive evaluation. Supports plans, shells, and specs. Use when the user asks to \"refine the plan\", \"refine the shells\", \"refine this spec\", \"iterate on the plan\", \"iterate on the shells\", \"tighten the plan\", \"tighten the shells\", \"tighten the spec\", \"improve the plan\", \"improve the shells\", or \"improve th

Stand up the project's live app and hand it to the user to try a change firsthand, then gate on their verdict before continuing. Use when the user asks to \"preview the change\", \"let me try it\", \"spin up the app so I can test it\", \"set it up so I can poke at it\", or before finalizing a UI/UX change that needs human eyes.

Run the post-implementation quality assurance workflow including tests, code polishing, review, and commit. Use when the user asks to \"finalize implementation\", \"finalize changes\", \"wrap up implementation\", \"finish up\", \"ready to commit\", or \"run QA workflow\".

Detect what dev tooling infrastructure a project has and flag gaps across linters, formatters, pre-commit hooks, test runners, and CI/CD pipelines. Returns structured findings without applying changes. Use when the user asks to \"review tooling\", \"check project tooling\", \"what tooling is missing\", \"review dev infrastructure\", or \"tooling audit\".

Extract lessons from the current session and route them to the appropriate knowledge layer (project AGENTS.md, auto memory, existing skills, or new skills). Use when the user asks to \"self-improve\", \"distill this session\", \"save learnings\", \"update AGENTS.md with what we learned\", \"capture session insights\", \"remember this for next time\", \"extract lessons\", \"update skills from sessi

Apply findings by making the suggested code changes. Applies accepted verdicts, escalates ambiguous findings to the user, and offers to note genuine improvements for later. Use when the user asks to \"apply findings\", \"apply fixes\", \"apply suggestions\", \"apply accepted findings\", \"fix the findings\", or \"apply the review results\".

Run a multi-agent review of code comments and markdown documentation for unnecessary content, then fix the issues. Covers what-restating comments, name-mirroring doc comments, status-update prose, and other documentation noise. Use when the user asks to \"simplify docs\", \"simplify documentation\", \"clean up comments\", \"clean up docs\", \"review documentation\", \"strip unnecessary comments\",