Published skills
myBadSkill
Helps with things
no-pre-existing-failures
Test accountability policy. All failures belong to the current changeset. Commits must include test results. No failures on main.
sandbox
Scaffolds a Docker "sandbox" harness into a repo so Claude Code can run in `--dangerously-skip-permissions` (YOLO) mode inside an Ubuntu container, with the project bind-mounted at /workspace and the host's ~/.claude bind-mounted for auth and session continuity. Use when the developer wants an isolated filesystem for agent writes but still wants host-visible builds, logs, and session history.
sdlc-cross-review
Review a document against its SDLC lifecycle context — assess completeness and check consistency with parent documents in the document hierarchy.
dev-record
Record agent activity during Claude Code sessions. Captures plans, human input, agent decisions, and deviations via hooks and agent self-reporting.
flesh-out
Transform raw/crude document drafts into structured content. Use when a document is a skeleton of ideas, notes, or stream-of-consciousness that needs generative expansion rather than review polish.
generator-coding
Template-based code generation pattern using data models, templates, and helper functions to generate repetitive interface code.
my-skill
What this skill does and when to use it. Claude uses this to decide when to load the skill automatically.
agent-optimize
Optimize a document for AI agent consumption. Restructures prose into formats that agents parse efficiently while preserving meaning.
review-skill
Reviews a SKILL.md file or skill directory for quality, correctness, and alignment with Claude Code skill conventions. Use when you've written a new skill and want to check it before committing, or when evaluating an existing skill for improvements.
review-steps
Structured review for polishing documents. Fixes language, improves clarity, checks structural consistency, and compares against best practice. Use when a draft has structure but needs a thorough review pass.
strong-edit
Critical editorial analysis of articles. Examines structure, argument strength, relevance, and readability. Use for substantive editing - challenging what's said and how, not just polish.
Category alert