Prompt Engineering
Design and optimize prompts for large language models (LLMs) to achieve reliable, high-quality outputs across diverse tasks.
Purpose
This skill provides systematic techniques for crafting prompts that consistently elicit desired behaviors from LLMs. Rather than trial-and-error prompt iteration, apply proven patterns (zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, structured outputs) to improve accuracy, reduce costs, and build production-ready LLM applications. Covers multi-model deployment (OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, open-source models) with Python and TypeScript examples.
When to Use This Skill
Trigger this skill when:
- Building LLM-powered applications requiring consistent outputs
- Model outputs are unreliable, inconsistent, or hallucinating
- Need structured data (JSON) from natural language inputs
- Implementing multi-step reasoning tasks (math, logic, analysis)
- Creating AI agents that use tools and external APIs
- Optimizing prompt costs or latency in production systems
- Migrating prompts across different model providers
- Establishing prompt versioning and testing workflows
Common requests:
- "How do I make Claude/GPT follow instructions reliably?"
- "My JSON parsing keeps failing - how to get valid outputs?"
- "Need to build a RAG system for question-answering"
- "How to reduce hallucination in model responses?"
- "What's the best way to implement multi-step workflows?"
Quick Start
Zero-Shot Prompt (Python + OpenAI):
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4",
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."},
{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this article in 3 sentences: [text]"}
],
temperature=0 # Deterministic output
)
print(response.choices[0].message.content)
Structured Output (TypeScript + Vercel AI SDK):
import { generateObject } from 'ai';
import { openai } from '@ai-sdk/openai';
import { z } from 'zod';
const schema = z.object({
name: z.string(),
sentiment: z.enum(['positive', 'negative', 'neutral']),
});
const { object } = await generateObject({
model: openai('gpt-4'),
schema,
prompt: 'Extract sentiment from: "This product is amazing!"',
});
Prompting Technique Decision Framework
Choose the right technique based on task requirements:
| Goal | Technique | Token Cost | Reliability | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simple, well-defined task | Zero-Shot | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Minimal | ⭐⭐⭐ Medium | Translation, simple summarization |
| Specific format/style | Few-Shot | ⭐⭐⭐ Medium | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ High | Classification, entity extraction |
| Complex reasoning | Chain-of-Thought | ⭐⭐ Higher | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Very High | Math, logic, multi-hop QA |
| Structured data output | JSON Mode / Tools | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Low-Med | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Very High | API responses, data extraction |
| Multi-step workflows | Prompt Chaining | ⭐⭐⭐ Medium | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ High | Pipelines, complex tasks |
| Knowledge retrieval | RAG | ⭐⭐ Higher | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ High | QA over documents |
| Agent behaviors | ReAct (Tool Use) | ⭐ Highest | ⭐⭐⭐ Medium | Multi-tool, complex tasks |
Decision tree:
START
├─ Need structured JSON? → Use JSON Mode / Tool Calling (references/structured-outputs.md)
├─ Complex reasoning required? → Use Chain-of-Thought (references/chain-of-thought.md)
├─ Specific format/style needed? → Use Few-Shot Learning (references/few-shot-learning.md)
├─ Knowledge from documents? → Use RAG (references/rag-patterns.md)
├─ Multi-step workflow? → Use Prompt Chaining (references/prompt-chaining.md)
├─ Agent with tools? → Use Tool Use / ReAct (references/tool-use-guide.md)
└─ Simple task → Use Zero-Shot (references/zero-shot-patterns.md)
Core Prompting Patterns
1. Zero-Shot Prompting
Pattern: Clear instruction + optional context + input + output format specification
When to use: Simple, well-defined tasks with clear expected outputs (summarization, translation, basic classification).
Best practices:
- Be specific about constraints and requirements
- Use imperative voice ("Summarize...", not "Can you summarize...")
- Specify output format upfront
- Set
temperature=0for deterministic outputs
Example:
prompt = """
Summarize the following customer review in 2 sentences, focusing on key concerns:
Review: [customer feedback text]
Summary:
"""
See references/zero-shot-patterns.md for comprehensive examples and anti-patterns.
2. Chain-of-Thought (CoT)
Pattern: Task + "Let's think step by step" + reasoning steps → answer
When to use: Complex reasoning tasks (math problems, multi-hop logic, analysis requiring intermediate steps).
Research foundation: Wei et al. (2022) demonstrated 20-50% accuracy improvements on reasoning benchmarks.
Zero-shot CoT:
prompt = """
Solve this problem step by step:
A train leaves Station A at 2 PM going 60 mph.
Another leaves Station B at 3 PM going 80 mph.
Stations are 300 miles apart. When do they meet?
Let's think through this step by step:
"""
Few-shot CoT: Provide 2-3 examples showing reasoning steps before the actual task.
See references/chain-of-thought.md for advanced patterns (Tree-of-Thoughts, self-consistency).
3. Few-Shot Learning
Pattern: Task description + 2-5 examples (input → output) + actual task
When to use: Need specific formatting, style, or classification patterns not easily described.
Sweet spot: 2-5 examples (quality > quantity)
Example structure:
prompt = """
Classify sentiment of movie reviews.
Examples:
Review: "Absolutely fantastic! Loved every minute."
Sentiment: positive
Review: "Waste of time. Terrible acting."
Sentiment: negative
Review: "It was okay, nothing special."
Sentiment: neutral
Review: "{new_review}"
Sentiment:
"""
Best practices:
- Use diverse, representative examples
- Maintain consistent formatting
- Randomize example order to avoid position bias
- Label edge cases explicitly
See references/few-shot-learning.md for selection strategies and common pitfalls.
4. Structured Output Generation
Modern approach (2025): Use native JSON modes and tool calling instead of text parsing.
OpenAI JSON Mode:
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4",
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": "Extract user data as JSON."},
{"role": "user", "content": "From bio: 'Sarah, 28, sarah@example.com'"}
],
response_format={"type": "json_object"}
)
Anthropic Tool Use (for structured outputs):
import anthropic
client = anthropic.Anthropic()
tools = [{
"name": "record_data",
"description": "Record structured user information",
"input_schema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"name": {"type": "string"},
"age": {"type": "integer"}
},
"required": ["name", "age"]
}
}]
message = client.messages.create(
model="claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022",
max_tokens=1024,
tools=tools,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Extract: 'Sarah, 28'"}]
)
TypeScript with Zod validation:
import { generateObject } from 'ai';
import { z } from 'zod';
const schema = z.object({
name: z.string(),
age: z.number(),
});
const { object } = await generateObject({
model: openai('gpt-4'),
schema,
prompt: 'Extract: "Sarah, 28"',
});
See references/structured-outputs.md for validation patterns and error handling.
5. System Prompts and Personas
Pattern: Define consistent behavior, role, constraints, and output format.
Structure:
1. Role/Persona
2. Capabilities and knowledge domain
3. Behavior guidelines
4. Output format constraints
5. Safety/ethical boundaries
Example:
sys