/research -- Investigate a topic
The user wants to research a topic within the current sprint.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS
Instructions
-
Identify the active sprint by checking for
claims.jsonin the project root, or ask which sprint to target if none exists. -
Plan research passes (2-4 passes depending on topic breadth):
- Pass 1: Broad landscape -- what exists, key concepts, major players
- Pass 2: Deep dive -- technical details, implementation specifics
- Pass 3: Risk and trade-offs -- failure modes, limitations, alternatives
- Pass 4 (if needed): Synthesis -- cross-cutting insights, recommendations
-
For each pass:
- Use WebSearch and WebFetch for general research
- When the user references a GitHub repo or the current repo is on GitHub, use DeepWiki tools to gather codebase context
- For private repos, use Read/Grep/Glob to analyze code directly
- Add 3-5 claims per pass via
wheat_add-claim:- Use
r###ID prefix - Set appropriate evidence tier (web, documented, tested)
- Include source URLs in source.artifact when available
- Mix claim types: factual, estimate, risk, recommendation
- Use
- Run
wheat_compileafter each pass - Announce progress: "Pass 2/3 complete: 11 claims across 4 topics."
-
Completion check: After all passes, run
wheat_status.- If total_claims >= 8 and the user's original message included words like "write up", "summarize", "brief", or "report", immediately run the /brief workflow.
- Otherwise, suggest next steps.
-
Print summary:
Research complete: <pass_count> passes, <claim_count> claims across <topic_count> topics. Next steps: /brief -- generate a compiled brief /challenge r003 -- stress-test a specific finding /witness r005 <url> -- corroborate with external source