Explore skills

Use when facing multi-criteria decisions like tech stack selection, architecture choices, or library comparisons. Applies the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) framework to structure the decision into criteria hierarchies, perform multi-perspective pairwise comparisons, check consistency, score alternatives, and produce a ranked decision report with weighted trade-off analysis.

A comprehensive OSINT methodology for external red-team operations and authorized attack-surface assessments. It covers a 5-stage recon pipeline, asset-graph discipline, severity rubric, confidence upgrade workflows, time budgeting, identity-fabric mapping, breach-identity correlation, detectability tagging, detection-aware probing, WAF/CDN bypass, vulnerability prioritization, and phishing infrastructure.

Run a PRISM College session — multi-LLM peer review for one-way-door architecture decisions. Sub-commands prepare / refract / inspect / sync / settle / memorialize walk a state machine; use the no-arg form for state-aware status.

Generate concise Conventional Commits messages from a staged diff. Enforces full type set, imperative subject lines, no AI co-author attribution. Use when user wants to commit, asks for a commit message, mentions "commit", or invokes /commit.

Use when user has a stake or perspective in a decision and wants to participate in discernment rather than receive advice - facilitates user alongside agent voices with participatory discipline teaching

Test, validate, and verify that code changes produce correct product behavior. Use when the user says 'verify this works', 'test the feature', 'check the output', 'does this actually work', 'validate the behavior', 'smoke test', 'QA this', 'acceptance test', or 'make sure it works end to end'. Also triggers on 'product verification', 'behavior validation', 'functional check', 'integration verifica

Perform structured code reviews enforcing quality standards, naming conventions, architecture patterns, and team agreements. Use when the user says 'review this code', 'code review', 'check quality', 'review my PR', 'what's wrong with this', 'improve this code', 'review before merge', 'peer review', or 'audit this'. Also triggers on 'code quality', 'review standards', 'enforce conventions', 'tech

Operational arsenal for external red-team and bug-bounty reconnaissance. Includes concrete wordlists for various paths (Swagger, GraphQL, SAML), high-risk ports, missing headers, HTTP checks, cloud bucket permutations, JS guess-paths, and vendor/cloud-native/container/K8s fingerprints.

Use when facing questions with ethical weight, multiple valid approaches, significant trade-offs, or potential for harm - before answering, convene internal voices to discern rather than conclude

Apply the modernization changes from analysis.md (produced by java-modernization-review) to create a Java 21 version of the reviewed file. Only run after the user has reviewed and approved analysis.md.

Helps users make decisions among multiple alternatives using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Ideal for choosing between options, comparing alternatives, ranking choices, or deciding the best fit for a situation.

Claude Code token optimization advisor. Analyzes current session/project for token waste and applies proven cost-reduction strategies.