Purpose
Guide product managers through preparing for customer discovery interviews by asking adaptive questions about research goals, customer segments, constraints, and methodologies. Use this to design effective interview plans, craft targeted questions, avoid common biases, and maximize learning from limited customer access—ensuring discovery interviews yield actionable insights rather than confirmation bias or surface-level feedback.
This is not a script generator—it's a strategic prep process that outputs a tailored interview plan with methodology, question framework, and success criteria.
Key Concepts
The Discovery Interview Prep Flow
An interactive process that:
- Gathers product/problem context (marketing materials, assumptions)
- Defines research goals (what you're trying to learn)
- Identifies target customer segment and access constraints
- Recommends interview methodology (Jobs-to-be-Done, problem validation, switch interviews, etc.)
- Generates interview framework with questions, biases to avoid, and success metrics
Why This Works
- Goal-driven: Aligns interview approach to what you need to learn
- Adaptive: Adjusts methodology based on product stage (idea vs. existing product) and access constraints
- Bias-aware: Highlights common pitfalls (leading questions, confirmation bias, solution-first thinking)
- Actionable: Outputs interview guide ready to use
Anti-Patterns (What This Is NOT)
- Not a user testing script: Discovery = learning problems; testing = validating solutions
- Not a sales demo: Don't pitch—listen and learn
- Not surveys at scale: Deep qualitative interviews (5-10 people), not broad surveys (100+ people)
When to Use This
- Starting product discovery (validating problem space)
- Repositioning an existing product (understanding new market)
- Investigating churn or drop-off (retention interviews)
- Evaluating feature ideas before building
- Preparing for customer development sprints
When NOT to Use This
- User testing a prototype (use usability testing frameworks instead)
- Quantitative research at scale (use surveys, analytics)
- When you already know the problem (move to solution validation)
Facilitation Source of Truth
Use workshop-facilitation as the default interaction protocol for this skill.
It defines:
- session heads-up + entry mode (Guided, Context dump, Best guess)
- one-question turns with plain-language prompts
- progress labels (for example, Context Qx/8 and Scoring Qx/5)
- interruption handling and pause/resume behavior
- numbered recommendations at decision points
- quick-select numbered response options for regular questions (include
Other (specify)when useful)
This file defines the domain-specific assessment content. If there is a conflict, follow this file's domain logic.
Application
This interactive skill asks up to 4 adaptive questions, offering 3-4 enumerated options at each step.
Step 0: Gather Context (Before Questions)
Agent suggests:
Before we design your interview plan, let's gather context:
For Your Own Product (Existing or Planned):
- Problem hypothesis or product concept description
- Target customer segment (if known)
- Existing research (support tickets, churn data, user feedback)
- Product website or positioning materials
- Key assumptions you're trying to validate
For Investigating an Existing Problem:
- Customer complaints, support tickets, or churn reasons
- Hypotheses about why customers leave or struggle
- Competitive alternatives customers switch to
If Exploring a New Problem Space:
- Find similar products or adjacent solutions
- Copy competitor materials, customer reviews (G2, Capterra), or community discussions (Reddit, forums)
- We'll use these to frame hypotheses
You can paste this content directly, or we can proceed with a brief description.
Question 1: Research Goal
Agent asks: "What's the primary goal of these discovery interviews? (What do you need to learn?)"
Offer 4 enumerated options:
- Problem validation — "Confirm that a problem exists and is painful enough to solve" (for new product ideas)
- Jobs-to-be-Done discovery — "Understand what customers are trying to accomplish and why current solutions fail" (for product strategy)
- Retention/churn investigation — "Figure out why customers leave or don't activate" (for existing products with churn issues)
- Feature prioritization — "Validate which problems/features matter most to customers" (for roadmap planning)
Or describe your own research goal (be specific: what question are you trying to answer?).
User response: [Selection or custom]
Question 2: Target Customer Segment
Agent asks: "Who are you interviewing? (Be as specific as possible.)"
Offer 4 enumerated options (adapted based on Q1):
Example (if Q1 = Problem validation):
- People who experience the problem regularly — E.g., "Small business owners who manually process invoices weekly" (high pain frequency)
- People who've tried to solve it — E.g., "Users who've tried 2+ competing solutions and churned" (understand failures)
- People in the target segment (regardless of problem awareness) — E.g., "All freelancers, even if they don't realize invoicing is a problem" (uncover latent needs)
- People who've recently experienced the problem — E.g., "Customers who churned in the last 30 days" (fresh memory)
Or describe your specific target segment (role, company size, behaviors, demographics).
Adaptation tip: Use personas or customer segments from provided materials.
User response: [Selection or custom]
Question 3: Constraints
Agent asks: "What constraints are you working with for these interviews?"
Offer 4 enumerated options:
- Limited access — "Can only interview 5-10 customers, need results in 2 weeks" (common for startups or fast timelines)
- Existing customer base — "Have 100+ active customers, can recruit easily" (mature product advantage)
- Cold outreach required — "No existing customers; need to recruit from scratch via LinkedIn, ads, or communities" (new product challenge)
- Internal stakeholders only — "Can interview sales/support teams who talk to customers daily" (proxy research, less ideal but pragmatic)
Or describe your specific constraints (budget, time, access, team capacity).
User response: [Selection or custom]
Question 4: Interview Methodology
Agent asks: "Based on your goal ([Q1]), target segment ([Q2]), and constraints ([Q3]), here are recommended interview methodologies:"
Offer 3-4 enumerated options (context-aware based on Q1-Q3):
Example (if Q1 = Problem validation, Q2 = People who experience problem regularly, Q3 = Limited access):
-
Problem validation interviews (Mom Test style) — Ask about past behavior, not hypotheticals. Focus on: "Tell me about the last time you [experienced the problem]. What did you try? What happened?" (Best for: Validating if problem is real and painful)
-
Jobs-to-be-Done (JTBD) interviews — Focus on what customers are trying to accomplish, not what they want. Ask: "What were you trying to get done? What alternatives did you consider? What made you choose X?" (Best for: Understanding motivations and switching behavior)
-
Switch interviews — Interview customers who recently switched from a competitor or alternative. Ask: "What prompted you to look for a new solution? What was the 'push' away from the old tool? What 'pulled' you to try ours?" (Best for: Understanding competitive positioning and unmet needs)
-
Timeline/journey mapping interviews — Walk through their entire experience chronologically. Ask: "Walk me through the first time you encountered this problem. What happened next? How did you try to solve it?" (Best for: Uncovering full context and pain