Paths: File paths (
references/,../ln-*) are relative to this skill directory.
Story Prioritizer
Type: L3 Worker Category: 2XX Planning
Evaluate Stories using RICE scoring with market research. Generate consolidated prioritization table for Epic.
Purpose & Scope
- Prioritize Stories AFTER ln-220 creates them
- Triage all Stories cheaply before doing deep research
- Research market size and competition only where it changes prioritization confidence
- Calculate RICE score for each Story
- Generate prioritization table (P0/P1/P2/P3)
- Output: docs/market/[epic-slug]/prioritization.md
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Stories created by ln-220, need business prioritization
- Planning sprint with limited capacity (which Stories first?)
- Stakeholder review requires data-driven priorities
- Evaluating feature ROI before implementation
Do NOT use when:
- Epic has no Stories yet (run ln-220 first)
- Stories are purely technical (infrastructure, refactoring)
- Prioritization already exists in docs/market/
Input Parameters
| Parameter | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| epic | Yes | Epic ID or "Epic N" format | - |
| stories | No | Specific Story IDs to prioritize | All in Epic |
| depth | No | Research depth (quick/standard/deep) | "standard" |
depth options:
quick- 2-3 min/Story, 1 WebSearch per typestandard- 5-7 min/Story, 2-3 WebSearches per typedeep- 8-10 min/Story, comprehensive research
Output Structure
docs/market/[epic-slug]/
└── prioritization.md # Consolidated table + RICE details + sources
Runtime Contract
MANDATORY READ: Load references/planning_worker_runtime_contract.md, references/coordinator_summary_contract.md
MANDATORY READ: Load references/researchgraph_mcp_usage.md when Stories cite H/G/run IDs or project researchgraph evidence can change priority confidence.
Runtime family: planning-worker-runtime
Identifier:
epic-{epicId}
Phases:
PHASE_0_CONFIGPHASE_1_DISCOVERYPHASE_2_LOAD_STORY_METADATAPHASE_3_ANALYZE_STORIESPHASE_4_GENERATE_PRIORITIZATIONPHASE_5_WRITE_SUMMARYPHASE_6_SELF_CHECK
Summary contract:
summary_kind=story-prioritization-worker- payload includes
epic_id,depth,stories_analyzed,priority_distribution,top_story_ids,prioritization_path,warnings - managed mode writes to caller-provided
summaryArtifactPath - default managed artifact path pattern:
.hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{parent_run_id}/story-prioritization-worker/ln-230--{identifier}.json
Table columns (from user requirements):
| Priority | Customer Problem | Feature | Solution | Rationale | Impact | Market | Sources | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | User pain point | Story title | Technical approach | Why important | Business impact | $XB | [Link] | Blue 1-3 / Red 4-5 |
Inputs
| Input | Required | Source | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
epicId | Yes | args, kanban, user | Epic to process |
Resolution: Epic Resolution Chain. Status filter: Active (planned/started)
Tools Config
MANDATORY READ: Load references/environment_state_contract.md, references/storage_mode_detection.md, references/input_resolution_pattern.md
Extract: task_provider = Task Management → Provider
Research Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Example Query |
|---|---|---|
| WebSearch | Market size, competitors | "[domain] market size {current_year}" |
| mcp__Ref | Industry reports | "[domain] market analysis report" |
| hex-research | Local hypothesis, goal, and benchmark evidence | find_hypotheses, inspect_goal, find_runs for explicit H/G/run context |
| Task provider | Load Stories | IF linear: list_issues / ELSE: Glob story.md |
| Glob | Check existing | "docs/market/[epic]/*" |
Workflow
Phase 1: Discovery (2 min)
Objective: Validate input and prepare context.
Process:
-
Resolve epicId: Run Epic Resolution Chain per guide.
-
Load Epic details:
- IF task_provider == "linear":
get_project(query=epicId) - ELSE IF task_provider == "github":
gh issue view {epicId} -R {REPO} --json number,title,body - ELSE:
Read("docs/tasks/epics/epic-{N}-*/epic.md") - Extract: Epic ID, title, description
- IF task_provider == "linear":
-
Auto-discover configuration:
- Read
docs/tasks/kanban_board.mdfor Team ID - Slugify Epic title for output path
- Read
-
Check existing prioritization:
Glob: docs/market/[epic-slug]/prioritization.md- If exists: Ask "Update existing or create new?"
- If new: Continue
-
Create output directory:
mkdir -p docs/market/[epic-slug]/
Output: Epic metadata, output path, existing check result
Phase 2: Load Stories Metadata (3 min)
Objective: Build Story queue with metadata only and prepare rough scoring inputs for all Stories.
Process:
-
Query Stories from Epic: IF task_provider == "linear":
list_issues(project=Epic.id, label="user-story")ELSE IF task_provider == "github":
gh api /repos/{O}/{R}/issues/{epic_num}/sub_issues --jq '.[].number' → for each: gh issue view {num} -R {REPO} --json number,title,state,labels → filter: label "user-story"ELSE (file mode):
Glob("docs/tasks/epics/epic-{N}-*/stories/*/story.md") -
Extract metadata only:
- Story ID, title, status
- minimal Epic context if available
- DO NOT load full descriptions yet
-
Filter Stories:
- Exclude: Done, Cancelled, Archived
- Include: Backlog, Todo, In Progress
-
Build processing queue:
- Order by: existing priority (if any), then by ID
- Count: N Stories to process
Output: Story queue (ID + title + minimal context), ~50-80 tokens/Story
Phase 3: Two-Pass Story Analysis
Objective: Score all Stories cheaply first, then spend deep research only on candidates where it changes the decision.
Critical: Keep maximum context to one full Story at a time even during deep research.
If a researchgraph layout exists, run local graph checks only for Stories whose priority depends on hypothesis status, goal coverage, benchmark evidence, or implementation readiness. Local graph evidence can change RICE confidence and risk; it does not replace market-size or competitor research.
Pass A: Cheap Triage For All Stories
For each Story, load only enough detail to estimate:
- customer problem
- rough solution shape
- likely reach
- likely impact
- likely effort
- initial confidence tier
Step 3.1: Load Story Description
IF task_provider == "linear":
// configured tracker provider: getStory(id=storyId)
ELSE IF task_provider == "github":
gh issue view {storyId} -R {REPO} --json number,title,body,state,labels
ELSE (file mode):
Read("docs/tasks/epics/epic-{N}-*/stories/us{NNN}-*/story.md")
Extract from Story:
- Feature: Story title
- Customer Problem: From "So that [value]" + Context section
- Solution: From Technical Notes (implementation approach)
- Rationale: From AC + Success Criteria
Step 3.2: Build rough RICE estimate
Use Story + Epic context to assign:
- rough
Reach - rough
Impact - rough
Effort - initial
Confidence
Mark one of:
full_research_requiredrough_estimate_okborderline_needs_review
Send to Pass B only if:
- candidate looks P0/P1 on rough score
- confidence is low
- Story is near a priority threshold
- Story has strategic or market-sensitive uncertainty
Pass B: Selective Deep Research
Only for Stories selected in Pass A, run full external research.
Step 3.3: Research Market Size
**WebSearch queries (based