Grill Me
Relentless questioning of your plan against the project's domain model, sharpening terminology and updating documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise.
When to Use
- Stress-testing a plan — "I want to add a refund flow to the Order service"
- Clarifying fuzzy language — "We're calling it 'account' but is that a Customer or a User?"
- Onboarding to a domain — "Walk me through how the Billing context relates to Ordering"
- Before writing specs — Ensuring the domain language is solid before
spec-researchbegins - After code review — "The PR introduces 'cancellation' but our glossary says..."
When NOT to Use
- Simple implementation questions — Use
oracle-challengeororacle-architectinstead - Debugging — Use
code-debug - Testing strategy — Use
oracle-testing - Already in spec workflow — Use
spec-research+oracle-architectfor domain discovery during the spec process
How It Works
<interview-loop>Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
Ask the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each question before continuing.
If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.
</interview-loop>Domain Awareness
Discovering Context
Most repos have a single context:
/
├── CONTEXT.md
├── docs/
│ └── adr/
│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/
If a CONTEXT-MAP.md exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:
/
├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
├── docs/
│ └── adr/ ← system-wide decisions
├── src/
│ ├── ordering/
│ │ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ │ └── docs/adr/ ← context-specific decisions
│ └── billing/
│ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ └── docs/adr/
Create files lazily — only when you have something to write. If no CONTEXT.md exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no docs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.
During the Session
Challenge Against the Glossary
When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in CONTEXT.md, call it out immediately.
"Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?"
Sharpen Fuzzy Language
When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term.
"You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."
Discuss Concrete Scenarios
When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.
Cross-Reference With Code
When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it:
"Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible — which is right?"
Update CONTEXT.md Inline
When a term is resolved, update CONTEXT.md right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in references/CONTEXT-FORMAT.md.
CONTEXT.md should be totally devoid of implementation details. Do not treat CONTEXT.md as a spec, a scratch pad, or a repository for implementation decisions. It is a glossary and nothing else.
Offer ADRs Sparingly
Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:
- Hard to reverse — the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
- Surprising without context — a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
- The result of a real trade-off — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons
If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in references/ADR-FORMAT.md.
Usage Examples
Stress-Test a New Feature
/grillme "I want to add a refund flow to the Order service"
"Before we go further — your glossary defines 'Order' as a completed purchase. A refund implies the Order is no longer complete. Is 'refund' a state on Order, or a new concept entirely?"
Clarify Ambiguous Terms
/grillme "We need to handle 'account' deletions"
"You said 'account' — your CONTEXT.md has both Customer and User. Which one are we deleting, and what happens to their Orders?"
Validate Against Existing Decisions
/grillme "I'm switching the write model from Postgres to DynamoDB"
"ADR-0002 says we chose Postgres for the write model because of ACID requirements. Have those requirements changed, or is this a new trade-off?"
Onboard to a Domain
/grillme "Explain how Billing relates to Ordering"
"Ordering emits OrderPlaced events. Billing consumes them to create Invoices. But your CONTEXT.md says Invoice is a request for payment — who decides when payment is actually processed?"
Relationship to Other Skills
| Skill | Use When |
|---|---|
| oracle-grillme | Questioning domain assumptions, sharpening terminology, updating docs inline |
| oracle-challenge | Critically evaluating a technical approach or decision |
| oracle-architect | Designing components, data models, API contracts during spec-research |
| spec-research | Structured discovery + architecture → spec.md (use grillme before this to solidify language) |
Key distinction:
oracle-challenge= "Is this approach valid?" (critical evaluation)oracle-grillme= "What do we mean by these words?" (domain interrogation)