Visual explainer
Generate self-contained HTML files for technical diagrams, editorial visualizations, and data tables. Always open the result in the browser. Never fall back to ASCII art when this skill is loaded.
Proactive table rendering. When you're about to present tabular data as an ASCII box-drawing table in the terminal (comparisons, audits, feature matrices, status reports, source verification grids — any structured rows/columns), generate an HTML page instead. The threshold: if the table has 4+ rows or 3+ columns, it belongs in the browser. Don't wait for the user to ask — render it as HTML automatically and tell them the file path. You can still include a brief text summary in the chat, but the table itself should be the HTML page.
Available commands
Detailed prompt templates in ./commands/. In Claude Code, namespaced (/visual-explainer:diff-review). In Pi, these are slash commands (/diff-review). In Codex, use /prompts:diff-review (if installed to ~/.codex/prompts/) or invoke $visual-explainer and describe the workflow.
| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
generate-web-diagram | Generate an HTML diagram for any topic |
generate-visual-plan | Generate a visual implementation plan for a feature |
generate-slides | Generate a magazine-quality slide deck |
diff-review | Visual diff review with architecture comparison and code review |
plan-review | Compare a plan against the codebase with risk assessment |
project-recap | Mental model snapshot for context-switching back to a project |
fact-check | Verify accuracy of a document against actual code |
share-page | Deploy an HTML page to Vercel and get a live URL |
Workflow
1. Think (5 seconds, not 5 minutes)
Before writing HTML, commit to a direction. Don't default to "dark theme with blue accents" every time.
Visual is always default. Even essays, blog posts, and articles get visual treatment — extract structure into cards, diagrams, grids, tables.
Prose patterns (lead paragraphs, pull quotes, callout boxes) are accent elements within visual pages, not a separate mode. Use them to highlight key points or provide breathing room, but the page structure remains visual.
For prose accents, see "Prose Page Elements" in ./references/css-patterns.md. For everything else, use the standard freeform approach with aesthetic directions below.
Who is looking? A developer understanding a system? A reporter revisiting an investigation? An editor reviewing a story? A PM seeing the big picture? An academic auditing methodology? This shapes information density and visual complexity.
What type of content? Architecture, flowchart, sequence, data flow, schema/ER, state machine, mind map, class diagram, C4 architecture, data table, timeline, dashboard, source network, investigation map, editorial workflow, story structure, or prose-first page. Each has distinct layout needs and rendering approaches (see Diagram types below).
What aesthetic? Pick one and commit. The constrained aesthetics (Blueprint, Editorial, Paper/ink) are safer — they have specific requirements that prevent generic output. The flexible ones (IDE-inspired) require more discipline.
Constrained aesthetics (prefer these):
- Blueprint (technical drawing feel, subtle grid background, deep slate/blue palette, monospace labels, precise borders)
- Editorial broadsheet (serif headlines like Playfair Display or Crimson Pro, generous whitespace, muted earth tones or deep navy + gold)
- Paper and ink (warm cream
#faf7f5background, terracotta/sage accents, informal feel — good for newsroom features) - Magazine feature (large display serif, off-axis composition, rich pull quotes, photo-led)
- Academic / research paper (Libre Baskerville or Source Serif, restrained palette, footnotes-style detail, generous margins)
- Newsroom board (cork/pushpin texture, handwritten-style notes, pinned-card layouts — for editorial planning, story maps)
- Investigation wall (red string aesthetic, connected entities, graph-paper background, monochrome with red accents — for relationship maps)
- Monochrome terminal (green/amber on near-black, monospace everything, CRT glow optional)
Flexible aesthetics (use with caution):
- IDE-inspired (borrow a real, named color scheme: Dracula, Nord, Catppuccin Mocha/Latte, Solarized Dark/Light, Gruvbox, One Dark, Rosé Pine) — commit to the actual palette, don't approximate
- Data-dense / wire service (small type, tight spacing, maximum information, muted colors)
- Hand-drawn sketch (Mermaid
look: 'handDrawn', casual annotations — for whiteboard/early-stage thinking)
Explicitly forbidden:
- Neon dashboard (cyan + magenta + purple on dark) — always produces AI slop
- Gradient mesh (pink/purple/cyan blobs) — too generic
- Any combination of Inter font + violet/indigo accents + gradient text
Vary the choice each time. If the last diagram was dark and technical, make the next one light and editorial. The swap test: if you replaced your styling with a generic dark theme and nobody would notice the difference, you haven't designed anything.
2. Structure
Read the reference material before generating. Don't memorize it — read it each time to absorb the patterns.
- For text-heavy architecture overviews (card content matters more than topology): read
./templates/architecture.html - For flowcharts, sequence diagrams, ER, state machines, mind maps, class diagrams, C4: read
./templates/mermaid-flowchart.html - For data tables, comparisons, audits, feature matrices, source verification grids: read
./templates/data-table.html - For slide deck presentations (when
--slidesflag is present or/generate-slidesis invoked): read./templates/slide-deck.htmland./references/slide-patterns.md - For prose-heavy publishable pages (READMEs, articles, blog posts, essays): read the "Prose Page Elements" section in
./references/css-patterns.mdand "Typography by Content Voice" in./references/libraries.md
For CSS/layout patterns and SVG connectors, read ./references/css-patterns.md.
For pages with 4+ sections (reviews, recaps, dashboards), also read ./references/responsive-nav.md for section navigation with sticky sidebar TOC on desktop and horizontal scrollable bar on mobile.
Choosing a rendering approach:
| Content type | Approach | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture (text-heavy) | CSS Grid cards + flow arrows | Rich card content (descriptions, code, tool lists) needs CSS control |
| Architecture (topology-focused) | Mermaid | Visible connections between components need automatic edge routing |
| Flowchart / pipeline | Mermaid | Automatic node positioning and edge routing |
| Sequence diagram | Mermaid | Lifelines, messages, and activation boxes need automatic layout |
| Data flow | Mermaid with edge labels | Connections and data descriptions need automatic edge routing |
| ER / schema diagram | Mermaid | Relationship lines between many entities need auto-routing |
| State machine | Mermaid | State transitions with labeled edges need automatic layout |
| Mind map | Mermaid | Hierarchical branching needs automatic positioning |
| Class diagram | Mermaid | Inheritance, composition, aggregation lines with automatic routing |
| C4 architecture | Mermaid | Use graph TD + subgraph for C4 (not native C4Context — it ignores themes) |
| Data table / comparison / audit | HTML <table> | Semantic markup, accessibility, copy-paste behavior |
| Timeline / chronology | CSS (central line + cards) | Simple linear layout doesn't need a layout engine |
| Dashboard / metrics | CSS Grid + Chart.js | Card grid with embedded charts |
| Source network | Mermaid or CSS Grid cards | Map relationships between sources in an investigation or story |
| Editorial workflow | Mermaid flowchart | Story lifecycle from pitch through publish/distribute |
| Investigation map | CSS Grid c |