AEO Strategist — Internal Team Reference
For use by AEO practitioners on enterprise retainer client work
ARCHITECTURE OVERVIEW
SKILL.md ← You are here. Routing logic + mode templates.
industries/ ← Deep vertical files. Load the relevant one(s).
markets/ ← Deep regional files. Load the relevant one(s).
references/ ← Cross-cutting tools: eval criteria, tracking,
platform matrix, query taxonomy, PR targets,
onboarding, monthly workflow, glossary,
troubleshooting.
Progressive loading rule: SKILL.md is always in context. Load industry and market files on demand — only what this client needs. Never load all files at once.
STEP 1: CLIENT CONTEXT INTAKE
Check if client context is in conversation. If not, collect:
CLIENT CONTEXT INTAKE
─────────────────────
1. Client name + industry vertical
Options: Pharma / BFSI / Real Estate / SaaS-Tech / Retail-Ecommerce /
Healthcare / EdTech / Legal-Professional / Manufacturing /
Hospitality-Travel / Automotive / Media-Publishing / Other
(Multiple verticals? List all — apply strictest compliance constraint)
2. Primary market + region
Options: India / US / UK / UAE-MENA / SEA / Europe / Australia-NZ / Africa / Multi-market
(Multi-market? List all — see markets/ files for each)
3. Business model: B2B / B2C / Both
4. Competitive position: New entrant / Established (3+ yrs) / Defending market leader
5. Current AEO maturity: Zero / Partial (some done) / Advanced (active program)
6. Compliance constraints: [List any regulatory constraints known]
7. Target AI platforms: All / [specific platforms]
8. Primary objective this month: [audit / strategy / content brief / report / other]
Carry context through the full session. State your assumptions if inferring missing fields.
Load files:
industries/[vertical].md— trust signals, compliance, query taxonomy, platform prioritiesmarkets/[region].md— publications, directories, regulatory anchors, platform landscapereferences/eval-criteria.md— quality gates for the mode being run
STEP 2: MODE ROUTING TABLE
| Mode | Trigger | Type | Load |
|---|---|---|---|
/audit | "audit", "readiness check", "AEO gap", "where do we stand" | Workflow | industry + market + eval-criteria |
/strategy | "strategy", "full AEO plan", "how to approach AEO for X" | Workflow | industry + market |
/roadmap | "roadmap", "implementation plan", "20-week", "what do we do when" | Workflow | industry + market |
/competitor | "competitor", "why is X appearing", "displacement", "competitive gap" | Workflow | industry + market |
/report | "monthly report", "performance update", "client report", "AEO report" | Workflow | eval-criteria |
/explainer | "explain AEO", "CMO", "business case", "non-technical", "board deck" | Workflow | — |
/onboard | "new client", "onboard", "intake", "starting retainer", "first month" | Workflow | onboarding-checklist |
/track | "tracking setup", "set up monitoring", "GA4", "SOV baseline", "measurement" | Workflow | tracking-protocols |
/pr-brief | "PR brief", "PR targets", "earned media plan", "which publications" | Workflow | pr-targets + market |
/brief | "content brief", "brief for [topic]", "what should this article contain" | Production | industry + eval-criteria |
/rewrite | "restructure content", "make AEO-optimized", "rewrite for AI citation" | Production | eval-criteria |
/schema | "schema", "JSON-LD", "structured data", "[page type] markup" | Production | industry + eval-criteria |
/llms-txt | "llms.txt", "LLM summary file", "brand AI summary" | Production | eval-criteria |
/query-library | "query library", "queries to track", "what to monitor", "query set" | Production | query-taxonomy + industry |
/canonical | "canonical description", "brand description", "how to describe [brand]" | Production | — |
/research | "research [brand]", "what does AI say about X", "check if [brand] appears", "live check" | Live Intel | platform-matrix (uses web search) |
MODE: /audit
Load: industries/[vertical].md, markets/[region].md, references/eval-criteria.md
Output structure — all 5 categories are mandatory, in this order:
[Client] — AEO Readiness Audit
[Industry] | [Market] | [Competitive Position] | [Date]
AI Visibility Snapshot (current state — what AI says now vs what it should say)
Category 1: Technical Crawlability Use this table:
| Signal | Status | Priority Action |
|---|---|---|
| List: robots.txt per crawler, JS rendering risk (SPA flag), Bing WMT, Brave Search, IndexNow, | ||
| CCBot access, schema presence, llms.txt, page speed for crawl budget, canonical tags. |
Category 2: Content Extraction Readiness Answer-first structure score, 40–60 word chunk compliance, FAQ sections, grounding hook density (stats/citations/expert quotes per page), heading format quality, TL;DR summaries, table of contents for long pages.
Category 3: Entity & External Authority Wikidata status (exists/complete/sameAs links), Wikipedia (if applicable), directory presence (industry-specific rated complete/partial/missing), earned media footprint (last 12 months, AI-licensed publications), review platform volume and recency.
Category 4: Parametric vs RAG Gap What AI says now | What it should say | Gap type | Highest-risk incorrect claim.
Category 5: Competitive Displacement Gap Competitor's strongest anchor signal | Signals they have that client lacks | Urgency rating.
Priority Gap List
| Gap | Category | Priority | Effort | Impact | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (P1 = ≤30 days, P2 = this quarter, P3 = this year) |
⚠️ Compliance Section — always present; flag active constraints before recommendations.
Quick Wins — 3 actions completable within 2 weeks with high impact.
MODE: /strategy
Load: industries/[vertical].md, markets/[region].md
Branch at competitive position immediately:
- New entrant → "Parametric presence doesn't exist yet. RAG-first for months 1–6."
- Established → "Audit current parametric state before amplifying — model may have wrong impression."
- Defending → "Moat-building: original proprietary research is the only defensible signal."
Structure:
[Client] — AEO Strategy
[Industry] | [Market] | [Competitive Position] | [Date]
Strategic Framing — why AEO matters specifically for this client (competitive risk + opportunity)
Layer A: Parametric Influence (12–24 month horizon)
- Distributed presence targets (specific publications + communities from market file)
- Brand search volume growth track (explicit actions — not just measurement)
- Context breadth (which semantic neighborhoods brand must appear in)
- Authority signal embedding (industry-specific from vertical file)
- Parametric lag statement: "Expect 12–18 months. This is structural investment, not a campaign."
Layer B: RAG / Retrieval (Results in days–weeks)
- Content restructuring priority order (decision-stage pages first)
- Technical fixes (crawlers, schema, indexing)
- Directory and review optimization (from vertical + market files)
- Earned media targets (AI-licensed publications from market file)
- Reddit strategy (vertical-specific if applicable)
Platform Prioritization — from platform-matrix.md, applied to this vertical + region
Intent Proximity Framework — decision → comparison → awareness (never reverse this order)
B2B vs B2C — separate tracks if client operates both (different trust signals, different platform priorities)
AEO-SEO Cannibalization Note — for clients with strong organic traffic. Distinguish influence objective from conversion objective.
Timeline: Week 1–4 / Month 2–6 / Month 6–18 / Month 18–24+
⚠️ Compliance Section