Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

agent-evaluation

Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing,

41.2kestrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/agent-evaluation-sickn33/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/agent-evaluation-sickn33)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Desenvolvimento →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Desenvolvimento toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Desenvolvimento. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Agent Evaluation

Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks

Capabilities

  • agent-testing
  • benchmark-design
  • capability-assessment
  • reliability-metrics
  • regression-testing

Prerequisites

  • Knowledge: Testing methodologies, Statistical analysis basics, LLM behavior patterns
  • Skills_recommended: autonomous-agents, multi-agent-orchestration
  • Required skills: testing-fundamentals, llm-fundamentals

Scope

  • Does_not_cover: Model training evaluation (loss, perplexity), Fairness and bias testing, User experience testing
  • Boundaries: Focus is agent capability and reliability, Covers functional and behavioral testing

Ecosystem

Primary_tools

  • AgentBench - Multi-environment benchmark for LLM agents (ICLR 2024)
  • τ-bench (Tau-bench) - Sierra's real-world agent benchmark
  • ToolEmu - Risky behavior detection for agent tool use
  • Langsmith - LLM tracing and evaluation platform

Alternatives

  • Braintrust - When: Need production monitoring integration LLM evaluation and monitoring
  • PromptFoo - When: Focus on prompt-level evaluation Prompt testing framework

Deprecated

  • Manual testing only

Patterns

Statistical Test Evaluation

Run tests multiple times and analyze result distributions

When to use: Evaluating stochastic agent behavior

interface TestResult { testId: string; runId: string; passed: boolean; score: number; // 0-1 for partial credit latencyMs: number; tokensUsed: number; output: string; expectedBehaviors: string[]; actualBehaviors: string[]; }

interface StatisticalAnalysis { passRate: number; confidence95: [number, number]; meanScore: number; stdDevScore: number; meanLatency: number; p95Latency: number; behaviorConsistency: number; }

class StatisticalEvaluator { private readonly minRuns = 10; private readonly confidenceLevel = 0.95;

async evaluateAgent( agent: Agent, testSuite: TestCase[] ): Promise<EvaluationReport> { const results: TestResult[] = [];

// Run each test multiple times for (const test of testSuite) { for (let run = 0; run < this.minRuns; run++) { const result = await this.runTest(agent, test, run); results.push(result); } }

// Analyze by test const byTest = this.groupByTest(results); const testAnalyses = new Map<string, StatisticalAnalysis>();

for (const [testId, testResults] of byTest) { testAnalyses.set(testId, this.analyzeResults(testResults)); }

// Overall analysis const overall = this.analyzeResults(results);

return { overall, byTest: testAnalyses, concerns: this.identifyConcerns(testAnalyses), recommendations: this.generateRecommendations(testAnalyses) }; }

private analyzeResults(results: TestResult[]): StatisticalAnalysis { const passes = results.filter(r => r.passed); const passRate = passes.length / results.length;

// Calculate confidence interval for pass rate const z = 1.96; // 95% confidence const se = Math.sqrt((passRate (1 - passRate)) / results.length); const confidence95: [number, number] = [ Math.max(0, passRate - z se), Math.min(1, passRate + z * se) ];

const scores = results.map(r => r.score); const latencies = results.map(r => r.latencyMs);

return { passRate, confidence95, meanScore: this.mean(scores), stdDevScore: this.stdDev(scores), meanLatency: this.mean(latencies), p95Latency: this.percentile(latencies, 95), behaviorConsistency: this.calculateConsistency(results) }; }

private calculateConsistency(results: TestResult[]): number { // How consistent are the behaviors across runs? if (results.length < 2) return 1;

const behaviorSets = results.map(r => new Set(r.actualBehaviors)); let consistencySum = 0; let comparisons = 0;

for (let i = 0; i < behaviorSets.length; i++) { for (let j = i + 1; j < behaviorSets.length; j++) { const intersection = new Set( [...behaviorSets[i]].filter(x => behaviorSets[j].has(x)) ); const union = new Set([...behaviorSets[i], ...behaviorSets[j]]); consistencySum += intersection.size / union.size; comparisons++; } }

return consistencySum / comparisons; }

private identifyConcerns(analyses: Map<string, StatisticalAnalysis>): Concern[] { const concerns: Concern[] = [];

for (const [testId, analysis] of analyses) { if (analysis.passRate < 0.8) { concerns.push({ testId, type: 'low_pass_rate', severity: analysis.passRate < 0.5 ? 'critical' : 'high', message: Pass rate ${(analysis.passRate * 100).toFixed(1)}% below threshold }); }

if (analysis.behaviorConsistency < 0.7) { concerns.push({ testId, type: 'inconsistent_behavior', severity: 'high', message: Behavior consistency ${(analysis.behaviorConsistency * 100).toFixed(1)}% indicates unstable agent }); }

if (analysis.stdDevScore > 0.3) { concerns.push({ testId, type: 'high_variance', severity: 'medium', message: 'High score variance suggests unpredictable quality' }); } }

return concerns; } }

Behavioral Contract Testing

Define and test agent behavioral invariants

When to use: Need to ensure agent stays within bounds

// Define behavioral contracts: what agent must/must not do

interface BehavioralContract { name: string; description: string; mustBehaviors: BehaviorAssertion[]; mustNotBehaviors: BehaviorAssertion[]; contextual?: ConditionalBehavior[]; }

interface BehaviorAssertion { behavior: string; detector: (output: AgentOutput) => boolean; severity: 'critical' | 'high' | 'medium' | 'low'; }

class BehavioralContractTester { private contracts: BehavioralContract[] = [];

// Example contract for a customer service agent defineCustomerServiceContract(): BehavioralContract { return { name: 'customer_service_agent', description: 'Contract for customer service agent behavior',

mustBehaviors: [ { behavior: 'responds_politely', detector: (output) => !this.containsRudeLanguage(output.text), severity: 'critical' }, { behavior: 'stays_on_topic', detector: (output) => this.isRelevantToCustomerService(output.text), severity: 'high' }, { behavior: 'acknowledges_issue', detector: (output) => output.text.includes('understand') || output.text.includes('sorry to hear'), severity: 'medium' } ],

mustNotBehaviors: [ { behavior: 'reveals_internal_info', detector: (output) => this.containsInternalInfo(output.text

Compartilhar X LinkedIn