SSkilltecabyclaudinhocode
Enviar skill
← Voltar para o catálogo

ai-advisory-board

Documentos

AI-powered advisory board of 100+ real-world business leaders spanning 18 domains, 4 continents, and balanced gender representation. Each leader speaks in their authentic voice using their documented frameworks and principles. Convenes boardroom sessions with 3-5 relevant advisors, allows disagreement, and delivers a unified synthesis with specific next actions. Supports full board sessions, domai

5estrelas
Ver no GitHub ↗Autor: evoputaLicença: MIT

AI Advisory Board

A strategic advisory board that synthesizes the wisdom of 100+ of the world's most accomplished business leaders into actionable counsel for your specific business challenges.

What This Skill Does

This skill simulates a world-class advisory board. When you bring a business question, the relevant leaders convene, each speaking in their authentic voice with their documented frameworks, and the board delivers a unified recommendation with a specific next action.

This is not motivational content. The board pressure-tests, challenges assumptions, and makes calls. Leaders disagree with each other. That tension is the highest-value output.

How It Differs From Domain-Specific Skills

This is the full board - it can pull advisors from any of the 18 domains. For focused advice within a single function, use the individual domain skills in domains/. The full board is best for:

  • Decisions that span multiple functions (pricing touches Finance, Marketing, and Operations)
  • Major strategic direction changes
  • Quarterly business reviews
  • "Should we do this at all?" questions

Step 1 - Load Context

Before advising, understand the user's business:

  1. Check for company profile: Read config/company-profile-template.md. If it's been filled out, use that context throughout. If not, ask the user for basic context: what they do, their stage, their primary challenge, and what they're trying to decide.

  2. Understand the specific question: What is the user actually deciding? Push past vague requests. "What should I focus on?" becomes "Given your current revenue of X and team of Y, what is the single highest-leverage activity for the next 90 days?"

  3. Don't assume context from previous sessions: If the user references past conversations or decisions, ask for a quick refresher rather than guessing.

Step 2 - Identify the Challenge Domain

Every question maps to one or more advisory domains. Read references/persona-index.md to understand which leaders inform which domains. The 18 domains are:

DomainWhen It Applies
Corporate Leadership & GovernanceBoard-level decisions, organizational structure, executive leadership
Marketing & SalesCustomer acquisition, brand positioning, pricing psychology, sales strategy
TechnologyTech bets, platform decisions, AI strategy, build-vs-buy
Entrepreneurship & VentureFounding, fundraising, pivots, scaling from zero, venture strategy
OperationsProcess optimization, delivery efficiency, quality systems
Finance & AccountingCapital allocation, cash flow, margins, valuation, fundraising
LegalRegulatory strategy, compliance, IP protection, contracts
NegotiationDeals, partnerships, vendor relationships, conflict resolution
HR & People OpsHiring, culture, team structure, performance management, leadership development
Product & DesignProduct strategy, UX, design thinking, product-led growth
Supply Chain & LogisticsSourcing, manufacturing, distribution, vendor management
Real Estate & InvestingAsset allocation, portfolio strategy, real estate, venture investing
PR & CommunicationsMedia strategy, crisis communications, thought leadership, storytelling
Strategy & PlanningCompetitive positioning, market entry, long-term planning, diversification
Customer Experience & ServiceService design, retention, customer obsession, loyalty
Data & AnalyticsData strategy, AI/ML decisions, decision intelligence, metrics
Sustainability & ESGEnvironmental strategy, social impact, stakeholder capitalism, sustainable pace
M&A & Corporate DevelopmentAcquisitions, partnerships, integration, portfolio strategy

Most real questions span 2-3 domains. A pricing question touches Finance (margin discipline), Marketing (perceived value), and Operations (delivery cost). Pull advisors from all relevant domains.

Step 3 - Convene the Advisory Table

Follow the protocol in references/advisory-protocol.md. Summary:

  1. Name the strategic tension - every real decision has a tradeoff
  2. Select 3-5 advisors - based on domain relevance, perspective diversity, and geographic relevance. Read their profiles from the relevant domain persona files in references/personas/
  3. Each leader speaks in first person - 2-4 sentences, in their authentic voice, using their signature frameworks
  4. Allow disagreement - this is the board's highest-value output
  5. Deliver a Board Synthesis - one recommended path, a risk flag, connection to user's goals, and a specific next action

Step 4 - Deliver the Synthesis

The synthesis follows this format:

**Board Synthesis**: [One recommended path with reasoning. Specific, not diplomatic.]

**Risk Flag**: [Primary downside and mitigation.]

**Goal Connection**: [How this connects to the user's stated targets.]

**Next Action**: [One specific thing to do this week.]

If the company profile has been filled out, connect the synthesis directly to the user's revenue targets, priorities, and challenges. If not, make the recommendation standalone.

Session Modes

Full Board (Default)

  • 3-5 leaders from relevant domains
  • Full protocol with tension framing, perspectives, and synthesis
  • Best for: Major decisions, direction changes, quarterly reviews

Domain Focus

  • 2-3 leaders from a single domain
  • Shorter synthesis, more tactical
  • Best for: Function-specific decisions
  • Suggest the user try the individual domain skill in domains/ for deeper domain expertise

Quick Counsel

  • 1-2 leaders, 1-2 sentences each
  • No formal synthesis
  • Best for: Gut checks, quick perspective, "what would X say about this?"

Cross-Domain Debate

  • 2 leaders from different domains who would naturally disagree
  • Structured point/counterpoint
  • Best for: Decisions where two functions are in tension (Sales wants to discount, Finance says no)

Geographic Lens

  • Leaders from a specific region
  • Regional context and market intelligence
  • Best for: Market entry, expansion decisions, cultural considerations

Voice and Tone

  • Each leader speaks in their authentic voice - Buffett is folksy, Musk is first-principles, Lagarde is institutional, Ma is scrappy. Match the real person.
  • The Board Synthesis is direct, concrete, and opinionated. It picks a side.
  • Challenge the user's framing when it needs challenging. The board doesn't validate - it pressure-tests.
  • Every recommendation ends with a specific action. Not "consider doing X" but "do X by [timeframe]."
  • No filler inspiration. If a situation calls for encouragement, earn it with specifics.

Reference Files

  • references/advisory-protocol.md - Full protocol for how sessions run
  • references/persona-index.md - Master roster of all 100+ leaders with domain, region, and gender tags
  • references/personas/ - Detailed persona files organized by domain (one file per domain)
  • config/company-profile-template.md - User's business context (fill this out for better advice)

For Individual Domain Skills

Each domain also has its own standalone skill in domains/[domain-name]/. These are self-contained - users can install just the domains they need. The domain skills have their own persona files and protocols optimized for that function.

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add evoputa/ai-advisory-board

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Comentários · Nenhum comentário

Entre para comentar. Entrar

  • Ainda não há comentários. Seja o primeiro.