Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

assumption-mapper

Extrai e avalia o risco de suposições ocultas em briefs de produto ou PRDs, gerando um mapa de suposições priorizado com pontuações de confiança e impacto, métodos de validação e sinalizadores críticos.

991estrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/assumption-mapper/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/assumption-mapper)
#ai

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Segurança →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Segurança toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Segurança. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Assumption Mapper Skill

Surface and prioritize the untested assumptions embedded in any product plan before development begins.

Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:

  • Product brief, PRD, or concept description (even rough notes work)
  • Stage (concept / discovery / pre-build / post-launch — affects which assumptions matter most)

Process

  1. Read the provided brief, PRD, or concept description
  2. Extract assumptions across four categories:
  3. Desirability (do users want this?)
  4. Feasibility (can we build it?)
  5. Viability (will it sustain the business?)
  6. Usability (can users actually use it?)
  7. Score each assumption:
  8. Confidence (1-5): How sure are we this is true?
  9. Impact (1-5): How badly does the plan fail if this assumption is wrong?
  10. Priority = Impact − Confidence (higher = test first)
  11. Validate completeness — Ensure at least one assumption per category. If a category is empty, re-read the brief looking specifically for that type.
  12. Output a ranked list with recommended validation methods

Output Structure

Assumption Map: [Feature/Product Name]

| Assumption | Category | Confidence | Impact | Priority | Validation Method | |------------|----------|------------|--------|----------|-------------------| | [assumption] | [type] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [score] | [method] |

Critical Assumptions (Impact 4+ and Confidence 2 or below)

[Flagged items with detailed validation recommendations]

Top 3 Assumptions to Validate First

[Detailed recommendations including specific research method, estimated effort, and what the result would change]

Example (Partial)

Input: "We're building a self-serve onboarding flow to reduce time-to-value for SMB customers."

| Assumption | Category | Confidence | Impact | Priority | Validation Method | |------------|----------|------------|--------|----------|-------------------| | SMB users can complete onboarding without human help | Usability | 2 | 5 | 3 | Unmoderated usability test (n=8) | | Faster onboarding correlates with higher retention | Viability | 3 | 4 | 1 | Cohort analysis of current onboarding times vs. 90-day retention | | The current onboarding is the primary reason for slow time-to-value | Desirability | 2 | 4 | 2 | User interviews with recent churned SMB accounts |

Quality Checks

  • [ ] At least one assumption per category (Desirability, Feasibility, Viability, Usability)
  • [ ] All Impact 4+ / Confidence 2− assumptions flagged as CRITICAL
  • [ ] Each validation method is specific (not just "do research" — name the method and sample size)
  • [ ] Priority scores are consistent (Impact − Confidence, higher = more urgent)
Compartilhar X LinkedIn