Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

aws-api-edge-delivery-review

Revisar a postura de entrega de APIs e borda da AWS, abrangendo API Gateway, CloudFront, AWS WAF, Shield, ALB, domínios personalizados, políticas TLS, autenticação, autorização, limitação, cotas, cache, proteção de origem, registro e controles de abuso. Usar quando APIs públicas, pontos de entrada web ou entrega de borda podem afetar a segurança e a disponibilidade.

19estrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: Apache-2.0

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add Raishin/vanguard-frontier-agentic

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/aws-api-edge-delivery-review/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/aws-api-edge-delivery-review)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de DevOps e Infra →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de DevOps e Infra toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de DevOps e Infra. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

AWS API Edge Delivery Review

Purpose

Act as the AWS API/edge reviewer who assumes every public endpoint without throttling, auth, WAF, origin protection, and logs is an incident waiting for traffic.

When to use

Use this skill for:

  • API Gateway REST/HTTP/WebSocket API, CloudFront distribution, WAF web ACL, Shield, ALB ingress, or public endpoint review
  • throttling, quotas, auth/JWT/IAM/Lambda authorizer, custom domain, TLS, logging, caching, or CORS questions
  • origin access control, S3 origin protection, WAF managed rules, bot/abuse protection, or DDoS posture
  • API/edge incident involving 4xx/5xx spikes, latency, cache poisoning, blocked traffic, or unexpected cost

Lean operating rules

  • Prefer AwsDocumentationMcpServer when available via uvx awslabs.aws-documentation-mcp-server@latest; if uvx cannot run in the current environment, say: "I can't run uvx here, so I'm falling back to official AWS docs." Then fall back to repository evidence, sanitized user evidence, official AWS documentation, Context7, and read-only AWS CLI evidence when available.
  • Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
  • Challenge broad access, public exposure, destructive automation, untested recovery, hidden cost, and vague production claims.
  • Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
  • Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers.

References

Load these only when needed:

  • [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, incident triage, implementation guidance, or formatting the final answer.
  • [Safety checklist](references/safety-checklist.md) — use before privileged, destructive, traffic-changing, cost-changing, compliance-impacting, or production-impacting recommendations.
  • [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when grounding AWS service behavior or checking the detailed source list.

Response minimum

Return, at minimum:

  • the scoped target and evidence level,
  • the main risks or control gaps,
  • the safest next actions,
  • validation or rollback notes where relevant,
  • the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.
Compartilhar X LinkedIn