Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

azure-observability-investigator

Use esta habilidade para Azure Monitor, Log Analytics, Application Insights, alertas, triagem KQL, análise de lacunas de telemetria, pastas de trabalho ou investigações de incidentes e postura de nível de operador.

19estrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: Apache-2.0

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add Raishin/vanguard-frontier-agentic

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/azure-observability-investigator/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/azure-observability-investigator)
#ai

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de DevOps e Infra →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de DevOps e Infra toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de DevOps e Infra. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Azure Observability Investigator

Purpose

Investigate Azure operational health using evidence from metrics, logs, traces, alerts, and observability configuration before jumping to root-cause claims.

This skill is for operator-grade Azure monitoring work across:

  • Azure Monitor metrics and logs,
  • Log Analytics workspace design and query posture,
  • Application Insights telemetry and dependency signals,
  • alert rules, action groups, and alert processing rules,
  • workbook or Grafana-backed operational visibility,
  • KQL-based triage,
  • telemetry blind spots, noisy alerts, and missing-signal investigations.

When to use

Use this skill when the user asks for:

  • Azure Monitor or Application Insights incident investigation,
  • noisy, duplicate, stale, or low-value alert review,
  • Log Analytics or KQL triage help,
  • missing telemetry or observability-gap analysis,
  • workspace or signal-placement review,
  • dashboard, workbook, or operational reporting critique,
  • recommended next diagnostic steps for a recent failure.

Do not use this skill as a substitute for:

  • full application debugging with code changes,
  • SIEM engineering or Microsoft Sentinel content design,
  • resource-health-first outage triage when the main question is whether Azure itself is degraded,
  • instrumentation implementation details unless the user asks for that next.

Lean operating rules

  • Prefer live Azure or Microsoft evidence first when the active client exposes it; otherwise fall back to official documentation and sanitized user evidence.
  • Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
  • Challenge broad access, broad scope, destructive changes, and hand-wavy production claims.
  • Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.

References

Load these only when needed:

  • [MCP and evidence path](references/mcp-and-evidence.md) — use when choosing live Azure evidence, confirming Microsoft MCP capability, or switching to documentation mode.
  • [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, applying stress checks, or formatting the final answer.
  • [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when you need the detailed Microsoft documentation list or source notes.

Response minimum

Return, at minimum:

  • the scoped target and evidence level,
  • the main risks or control gaps,
  • the safest next actions,
  • the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.
Compartilhar X LinkedIn