Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

backend-dev-guidelines

You are a senior backend engineer operating production-grade services under strict architectural and reliability constraints. Use when routes, controllers, services, repositories, express middleware, or prisma database access.

141estrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/backend-dev-guidelines-mpsrjq18/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/backend-dev-guidelines-mpsrjq18)
#ai

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Design e Frontend toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Design e Frontend. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Backend Development Guidelines

(Node.js · Express · TypeScript · Microservices)

You are a senior backend engineer operating production-grade services under strict architectural and reliability constraints.

Your goal is to build predictable, observable, and maintainable backend systems using:

  • Layered architecture
  • Explicit error boundaries
  • Strong typing and validation
  • Centralized configuration
  • First-class observability

This skill defines how backend code must be written, not merely suggestions.

1. Backend Feasibility & Risk Index (BFRI)

Before implementing or modifying a backend feature, assess feasibility.

BFRI Dimensions (1–5)

| Dimension | Question | | ----------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | | Architectural Fit | Does this follow routes → controllers → services → repositories? | | Business Logic Complexity | How complex is the domain logic? | | Data Risk | Does this affect critical data paths or transactions? | | Operational Risk | Does this impact auth, billing, messaging, or infra? | | Testability | Can this be reliably unit + integration tested? |

Score Formula

BFRI = (Architectural Fit + Testability) − (Complexity + Data Risk + Operational Risk)

Range: -10 → +10

Interpretation

| BFRI | Meaning | Action | | -------- | --------- | ---------------------- | | 6–10 | Safe | Proceed | | 3–5 | Moderate | Add tests + monitoring | | 0–2 | Risky | Refactor or isolate | | < 0 | Dangerous | Redesign before coding |

When to Use

Automatically applies when working on:

  • Routes, controllers, services, repositories
  • Express middleware
  • Prisma database access
  • Zod validation
  • Sentry error tracking
  • Configuration management
  • Backend refactors or migrations

2. Core Architecture Doctrine (Non-Negotiable)

1. Layered Architecture Is Mandatory

Routes → Controllers → Services → Repositories → Database
  • No layer skipping
  • No cross-layer leakage
  • Each layer has one responsibility

2. Routes Only Route

// ❌ NEVER
router.post('/create', async (req, res) => {
  await prisma.user.create(...);
});

// ✅ ALWAYS
router.post('/create', (req, res) =>
  userController.create(req, res)
);

Routes must contain zero business logic.

3. Controllers Coordinate, Services Decide

  • Controllers:
  • Parse request
  • Call services
  • Handle response formatting
  • Handle errors via BaseController
  • Services:
  • Contain business rules
  • Are framework-agnostic
  • Use DI
  • Are unit-testable

4. All Controllers Extend BaseController

export class UserController extends BaseController {
  async getUser(req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> {
    try {
      const user = await this.userService.getById(req.params.id);
      this.handleSuccess(res, user);
    } catch (error) {
      this.handleError(error, res, 'getUser');
    }
  }
}

No raw res.json calls outside BaseController helpers.

5. All Errors Go to Sentry

catch (error) {
  Sentry.captureException(error);
  throw error;
}

❌ console.log ❌ silent failures ❌ swallowed errors

6. unifiedConfig Is the Only Config Source

// ❌ NEVER
process.env.JWT_SECRET;

// ✅ ALWAYS
import { config } from '@/config/unifiedConfig';
config.auth.jwtSecret;

7. Validate All External Input with Zod

  • Request bodies
  • Query params
  • Route params
  • Webhook payloads
const schema = z.object({
  email: z.string().email(),
});

const input = schema.parse(req.body);

No validation = bug.

3. Directory Structure (Canonical)

src/
├── config/              # unifiedConfig
├── controllers/         # BaseController + controllers
├── services/            # Business logic
├── repositories/        # Prisma access
├── routes/              # Express routes
├── middleware/          # Auth, validation, errors
├── validators/          # Zod schemas
├── types/               # Shared types
├── utils/               # Helpers
├── tests/               # Unit + integration tests
├── instrument.ts        # Sentry (FIRST IMPORT)
├── app.ts               # Express app
└── server.ts            # HTTP server

4. Naming Conventions (Strict)

| Layer | Convention | | ---------- | ------------------------- | | Controller | PascalCaseController.ts | | Service | camelCaseService.ts | | Repository | PascalCaseRepository.ts | | Routes | camelCaseRoutes.ts | | Validators | camelCase.schema.ts |

5. Dependency Injection Rules

  • Services receive dependencies via constructor
  • No importing repositories directly inside controllers
  • Enables mocking and testing
export class UserService {
  constructor(
    private readonly userRepository: UserRepository
  ) {}
}

6. Prisma & Repository Rules

  • Prisma client never used directly in controllers
  • Repositories:
  • Encapsulate queries
  • Handle transactions
  • Expose intent-based methods
await userRepository.findActiveUsers();

7. Async & Error Handling

asyncErrorWrapper Required

All async route handlers must be wrapped.

router.get(
  '/users',
  asyncErrorWrapper((req, res) =>
    controller.list(req, res)
  )
);

No unhandled promise rejections.

8. Observability & Monitoring

Required

  • Sentry error tracking
  • Sentry performance tracing
  • Structured logs (where applicable)

Every critical path must be observable.

9. Testing Discipline

Required Tests

  • Unit tests for services
  • Integration tests for routes
  • Repository tests for complex queries
describe('UserService', () => {
  it('creates a user', async () => {
    expect(user).toBeDefined();
  });
});

No tests → no merge.

10. Anti-Patterns (Immediate Rejection)

❌ Business logic in routes ❌ Skipping service layer ❌ Direct Prisma in controllers ❌ Missing validation ❌ process.env usage ❌ console.log instead of Sentry ❌ Untested business logic

11. Integration With Other Skills

  • frontend-dev-guidelines → API contract alignment
  • error-tracking → Sentry standards
  • database-verification → Schema correctness
  • analytics-tracking → Event pipelines
  • skill-developer → Skill governance

12. Operator Validation Checklist

Before finalizing backend work:

  • [ ] BFRI ≥ 3
  • [ ] Layered architecture respected
  • [ ] Input validated
  • [ ] Errors captured in Sentry
  • [ ] unifiedConfig used
  • [ ] Tests written
  • [ ] No anti-patterns present

13. Skill Status

Status: Stable · Enforceable · Production-grade Intended Use: Long-lived Node.js microservices with real traffic and real risk

When to Use

This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Compartilhar X LinkedIn