CC-DevFlow Orchestrator
Purpose
Guide users to the correct agent/command WITHOUT duplicating their detailed standards.
Workflow Map
🏢 项目级工作流(Project-Level, 项目初期执行一次)
/core-roadmap → ROADMAP.md + BACKLOG.md (产品路线图)
/core-architecture → ARCHITECTURE.md (系统架构设计)
/core-guidelines → frontend-guidelines.md / backend-guidelines.md (项目规范)
/core-style → STYLE.md (设计风格指南)
📦 需求级工作流(Requirement-Level, 每个需求执行一次)
/flow-init → research.md + tasks.json + BRAINSTORM.md (研究初始化 + 头脑风暴)
↓
/flow-clarify → clarifications/*.md (11 维度歧义扫描, 可选)
↓
/flow-prd → PRD.md (invoke prd-writer agent, 需 BRAINSTORM.md 对齐)
↓
/flow-checklist → checklists/*.md (需求质量检查, 可选)
↓
/flow-tech → TECH_DESIGN.md + data-model + contracts (invoke tech-architect agent)
↓
/flow-ui → UI_PROTOTYPE.html (invoke ui-designer agent, 可选, 引用 STYLE.md)
↓
/flow-epic → EPIC.md + TASKS.md (invoke planner, bite-sized tasks)
↓
/flow-dev → TASKS.md execution (TDD + Autonomous mode default)
↓
/flow-review → SPEC_REVIEW.md + CODE_QUALITY_REVIEW.md (Two-Stage Review)
↓
/flow-qa → QA reports (invoke qa-tester + security-reviewer agents)
↓
/flow-release → PR creation + deployment (分支完成决策)
↓
/flow-verify → consistency check (invoke consistency-checker agent, 任意阶段可调用)
🐛 Bug 修复工作流
/flow-fix "BUG-123|描述" → 系统化调试 (4阶段: Root Cause → Pattern → Hypothesis → TDD Fix)
说明:
- 项目级命令建立全局标准(SSOT),需求级命令引用这些标准
/flow-init包含 Brainstorming 阶段,生成 BRAINSTORM.md 作为需求「北极星」/flow-prd需要 BRAINSTORM.md 对齐检查/flow-clarify在 PRD 前可选执行,消除 research.md 中的歧义/flow-epic使用 bite-sized tasks 原则 (2-5分钟/任务)/flow-dev默认 Autonomous 模式(自动重试),使用--manual退出到 Manual 模式/flow-review是新增的两阶段审查 (Spec Compliance → Code Quality)/flow-ui和/flow-dev自动加载devflow/STYLE.md(如存在)- 项目级命令可按需执行,无严格顺序要求
Agent Delegation Guide
When User Asks About Requirements Clarification
- DO: Recommend
/flow-clarifycommand → invokes clarify-analyst agent - DON'T: Duplicate clarification logic (flow-clarify.md has ~128 lines)
- Link: See .claude/commands/flow-clarify.md for details
- Outputs: clarifications/[timestamp]-flow-clarify.md (澄清报告)
- Features: 11-dimension scan, ≤5 prioritized questions, session recovery
When User Asks About PRD
- DO: Recommend
/flow-prdcommand → invokes prd-writer agent - DON'T: Duplicate PRD standards (prd-writer agent has ~300 lines)
- Link: See .claude/agents/prd-writer.md for PRD details
- Standards: INVEST principles, Anti-Expansion mandate, Given-When-Then criteria
When User Asks About Requirement Quality Checklist
- DO: Recommend
/flow-checklistcommand → invokes checklist-agent - DON'T: Duplicate checklist standards (checklist-agent has ~180 lines)
- Link: See .claude/commands/flow-checklist.md for details
- Outputs: checklists/*.md (ux, api, security, performance, data, general)
- Features: 5 quality dimensions, Anti-Example rules, 80% gate threshold
- Level: Requirement-level (optional, before /flow-epic)
When User Asks About Tech Design
- DO: Recommend
/flow-techcommand → invokes tech-architect agent - DON'T: Duplicate tech standards (tech-architect agent has ~516 lines)
- Link: See .claude/agents/tech-architect.md for design details
- Outputs: TECH_DESIGN.md, data-model.md, contracts/, quickstart.md
When User Asks About Design Style Guide
- DO: Recommend
/core-stylecommand → invokes style-guide-generator agent - DON'T: Duplicate style guide standards (style-guide-generator agent has ~400 lines)
- Link: See .claude/agents/style-guide-generator.md for details
- Outputs: STYLE.md (project-level SSOT for visual consistency)
- Level: Project-level (execute once per project)
When User Asks About UI Prototype
- DO: Recommend
/flow-uicommand → invokes ui-designer agent - DON'T: Duplicate UI standards (ui-designer agent has ~485 lines)
- Link: See .claude/agents/ui-designer.md for UI details
- Features: 80+ design masters sampling, responsive design, NO PLACEHOLDER, references STYLE.md
When User Asks About Task Planning
- DO: Recommend
/flow-epiccommand → invokes planner agent - DON'T: Duplicate planning logic (planner agent has ~400 lines)
- Link: See .claude/agents/planner.md for task breakdown rules
- Enforces: Phase -1 Gates (Articles VII, VIII, IX), TDD sequence
When User Asks About QA/Security
- DO: Recommend
/flow-qacommand → invokes qa-tester + security-reviewer agents - DON'T: Duplicate QA standards (qa-tester agent has ~300 lines)
- Link: See .claude/agents/qa-tester.md for QA details
When User Asks About Code Review (v2.1.0 新增)
- DO: Recommend
/flow-reviewcommand → invokes spec-reviewer + code-quality-reviewer agents - DON'T: Duplicate review standards (Two-Stage Review)
- Link: See .claude/commands/flow-review.md for details
- Features: Stage 1 (Spec Compliance) → Stage 2 (Code Quality), 不信任实现者报告
When User Asks About Bug Fix (v2.1.0 新增)
- DO: Recommend
/flow-fixcommand → 4-phase systematic debugging - DON'T: Guess and fix without investigation
- Link: See .claude/commands/flow-fix.md for details
- Features: Root Cause → Pattern → Hypothesis → TDD Fix, Iron Law enforcement
Phase Gates (Quick Reference Only)
Entry Gates
- flow-init Entry: Git 工作区干净, main 分支
- flow-clarify Entry: research.md 存在, phase0_complete == true
- flow-prd Entry: BRAINSTORM.md 存在, research.md 无 TODO placeholder
- flow-checklist Entry: PRD.md 必须完成 (prd_complete == true)
- flow-tech Entry: PRD.md 必须完成
- flow-ui Entry: PRD.md 必须完成(可与 tech 并行)
- flow-epic Entry: PRD 完成,tech/ui 推荐但可选,Checklist Gate (如存在 checklists/)
- flow-dev Entry: EPIC.md + TASKS.md 存在
- flow-review Entry: development_complete == true
- flow-qa Entry: review_complete == true (或 development_complete)
- flow-release Entry: qa_complete == true
Exit Gates
- flow-init Exit: research.md 5-level quality check, BRAINSTORM.md 完整
- flow-clarify Exit: clarification report 完整, orchestration_status.clarify_complete == true
- flow-prd Exit: PRD.md 无 placeholder, Constitution 合规, BRAINSTORM 对齐
- flow-tech Exit: TECH_DESIGN.md + data-model + contracts 完整
- flow-epic Exit: TASKS.md TDD 顺序正确, bite-sized tasks, Phase -1 Gates 通过
- flow-dev Exit: 所有 TASKS 完成, TDD Checkpoint 通过, 测试通过
- flow-review Exit: SPEC_REVIEW.md + CODE_QUALITY_REVIEW.md 均 PASS
- flow-qa Exit: 无 high-severity 漏洞
- flow-release Exit: PR 创建成功, 分支决策完成
For Details: See orchestration_status.json and EXECUTION_LOG.md
State Machine: Status → Recommended Command
Read orchestration_status.json to determine current phase:
status: "initialized"
→ Recommend: /flow-clarify (optional, clarify ambiguities)
→ Alternative: /flow-prd (skip clarification, generate PRD directly)
→ Note: BRAINSTORM.md 已在 /flow-init 生成
status: "clarify_complete" OR "clarify_skipped"
→ Recommend: /flow-prd (generate PRD)
status: "prd_complete"
→ Recommend: /flow-tech (generate technical design)
→ Alternative: /flow-ui (generate UI prototype, optional)
status: "tech_design_complete"
→ If UI not done: /flow-ui (optional)
→ Else: /flow-epic (generate EPIC and TASKS)
status: "epic_complete"
→ Recommend: /flow-dev (TDD development, Autonomous mode default)
→ Alternative: /flow-dev --manual (Manual mode for complex requi