CC-DevFlow Orchestrator

Purpose

Guide users to the correct agent/command WITHOUT duplicating their detailed standards.

Workflow Map

🏢 项目级工作流（Project-Level, 项目初期执行一次）

/core-roadmap → ROADMAP.md + BACKLOG.md (产品路线图)
/core-architecture → ARCHITECTURE.md (系统架构设计)
/core-guidelines → frontend-guidelines.md / backend-guidelines.md (项目规范)
/core-style → STYLE.md (设计风格指南)

📦 需求级工作流（Requirement-Level, 每个需求执行一次）

/flow-init → research.md + tasks.json + BRAINSTORM.md (研究初始化 + 头脑风暴)
     ↓
/flow-clarify → clarifications/*.md (11 维度歧义扫描, 可选)
     ↓
/flow-prd → PRD.md (invoke prd-writer agent, 需 BRAINSTORM.md 对齐)
     ↓
/flow-checklist → checklists/*.md (需求质量检查, 可选)
     ↓
/flow-tech → TECH_DESIGN.md + data-model + contracts (invoke tech-architect agent)
     ↓
/flow-ui → UI_PROTOTYPE.html (invoke ui-designer agent, 可选, 引用 STYLE.md)
     ↓
/flow-epic → EPIC.md + TASKS.md (invoke planner, bite-sized tasks)
     ↓
/flow-dev → TASKS.md execution (TDD + Autonomous mode default)
     ↓
/flow-review → SPEC_REVIEW.md + CODE_QUALITY_REVIEW.md (Two-Stage Review) 
     ↓
/flow-qa → QA reports (invoke qa-tester + security-reviewer agents)
     ↓
/flow-release → PR creation + deployment (分支完成决策)
     ↓
/flow-verify → consistency check (invoke consistency-checker agent, 任意阶段可调用)

🐛 Bug 修复工作流

/flow-fix "BUG-123|描述" → 系统化调试 (4阶段: Root Cause → Pattern → Hypothesis → TDD Fix)

说明:

项目级命令建立全局标准（SSOT），需求级命令引用这些标准
/flow-init 包含 Brainstorming 阶段，生成 BRAINSTORM.md 作为需求「北极星」
/flow-prd 需要 BRAINSTORM.md 对齐检查
/flow-clarify 在 PRD 前可选执行，消除 research.md 中的歧义
/flow-epic 使用 bite-sized tasks 原则 (2-5分钟/任务)
/flow-dev 默认 Autonomous 模式（自动重试），使用 --manual 退出到 Manual 模式
/flow-review 是新增的两阶段审查 (Spec Compliance → Code Quality)
/flow-ui 和 /flow-dev 自动加载 devflow/STYLE.md（如存在）
项目级命令可按需执行，无严格顺序要求

Agent Delegation Guide

When User Asks About Requirements Clarification

DO: Recommend /flow-clarify command → invokes clarify-analyst agent
DON'T: Duplicate clarification logic (flow-clarify.md has ~128 lines)
Link: See [.claude/commands/flow-clarify.md](.claude/commands/flow-clarify.md) for details
Outputs: clarifications/[timestamp]-flow-clarify.md (澄清报告)
Features: 11-dimension scan, ≤5 prioritized questions, session recovery

When User Asks About PRD

DO: Recommend /flow-prd command → invokes prd-writer agent
DON'T: Duplicate PRD standards (prd-writer agent has ~300 lines)
Link: See [.claude/agents/prd-writer.md](.claude/agents/prd-writer.md) for PRD details
Standards: INVEST principles, Anti-Expansion mandate, Given-When-Then criteria

When User Asks About Requirement Quality Checklist

DO: Recommend /flow-checklist command → invokes checklist-agent
DON'T: Duplicate checklist standards (checklist-agent has ~180 lines)
Link: See [.claude/commands/flow-checklist.md](.claude/commands/flow-checklist.md) for details
Outputs: checklists/*.md (ux, api, security, performance, data, general)
Features: 5 quality dimensions, Anti-Example rules, 80% gate threshold
Level: Requirement-level (optional, before /flow-epic)

When User Asks About Tech Design

DO: Recommend /flow-tech command → invokes tech-architect agent
DON'T: Duplicate tech standards (tech-architect agent has ~516 lines)
Link: See [.claude/agents/tech-architect.md](.claude/agents/tech-architect.md) for design details
Outputs: TECH_DESIGN.md, data-model.md, contracts/, quickstart.md

When User Asks About Design Style Guide

DO: Recommend /core-style command → invokes style-guide-generator agent
DON'T: Duplicate style guide standards (style-guide-generator agent has ~400 lines)
Link: See [.claude/agents/style-guide-generator.md](.claude/agents/style-guide-generator.md) for details
Outputs: STYLE.md (project-level SSOT for visual consistency)
Level: Project-level (execute once per project)

When User Asks About UI Prototype

DO: Recommend /flow-ui command → invokes ui-designer agent
DON'T: Duplicate UI standards (ui-designer agent has ~485 lines)
Link: See [.claude/agents/ui-designer.md](.claude/agents/ui-designer.md) for UI details
Features: 80+ design masters sampling, responsive design, NO PLACEHOLDER, references STYLE.md

When User Asks About Task Planning

DO: Recommend /flow-epic command → invokes planner agent
DON'T: Duplicate planning logic (planner agent has ~400 lines)
Link: See [.claude/agents/planner.md](.claude/agents/planner.md) for task breakdown rules
Enforces: Phase -1 Gates (Articles VII, VIII, IX), TDD sequence

When User Asks About QA/Security

DO: Recommend /flow-qa command → invokes qa-tester + security-reviewer agents
DON'T: Duplicate QA standards (qa-tester agent has ~300 lines)
Link: See [.claude/agents/qa-tester.md](.claude/agents/qa-tester.md) for QA details

When User Asks About Code Review (v2.1.0 新增)

DO: Recommend /flow-review command → invokes spec-reviewer + code-quality-reviewer agents
DON'T: Duplicate review standards (Two-Stage Review)
Link: See [.claude/commands/flow-review.md](.claude/commands/flow-review.md) for details
Features: Stage 1 (Spec Compliance) → Stage 2 (Code Quality), 不信任实现者报告

When User Asks About Bug Fix (v2.1.0 新增)

DO: Recommend /flow-fix command → 4-phase systematic debugging
DON'T: Guess and fix without investigation
Link: See [.claude/commands/flow-fix.md](.claude/commands/flow-fix.md) for details
Features: Root Cause → Pattern → Hypothesis → TDD Fix, Iron Law enforcement

Phase Gates (Quick Reference Only)

Entry Gates

flow-init Entry: Git 工作区干净, main 分支
flow-clarify Entry: research.md 存在, phase0_complete == true
flow-prd Entry: BRAINSTORM.md 存在, research.md 无 TODO placeholder
flow-checklist Entry: PRD.md 必须完成 (prd_complete == true)
flow-tech Entry: PRD.md 必须完成
flow-ui Entry: PRD.md 必须完成（可与 tech 并行）
flow-epic Entry: PRD 完成，tech/ui 推荐但可选，Checklist Gate (如存在 checklists/)
flow-dev Entry: EPIC.md + TASKS.md 存在
flow-review Entry: development_complete == true
flow-qa Entry: review_complete == true (或 development_complete)
flow-release Entry: qa_complete == true

Exit Gates

flow-init Exit: research.md 5-level quality check, BRAINSTORM.md 完整
flow-clarify Exit: clarification report 完整, orchestration_status.clarify_complete == true
flow-prd Exit: PRD.md 无 placeholder, Constitution 合规, BRAINSTORM 对齐
flow-tech Exit: TECH_DESIGN.md + data-model + contracts 完整
flow-epic Exit: TASKS.md TDD 顺序正确, bite-sized tasks, Phase -1 Gates 通过
flow-dev Exit: 所有 TASKS 完成, TDD Checkpoint 通过, 测试通过
flow-review Exit: SPEC_REVIEW.md + CODE_QUALITY_REVIEW.md 均 PASS
flow-qa Exit: 无 high-severity 漏洞
flow-release Exit: PR 创建成功, 分支决策完成

For Details: See [orchestration_status.json](devflow/requirements/REQ-XXX/orchestration_status.json) and [EXECUTION_LOG.md](devflow/requirements/REQ-XXX/EXECUTION_LOG.md)

State Machine: Status → Recommended Command

Read orchestration_status.json to determine current phase:

status: "initialized"
  → Recommend: /flow-clarify (optional, clarify ambiguities)
  → Alternative: /flow-prd (skip clarification, generate PRD directly)
  → Note: BRAINSTORM.md 已在 /flow-init 生成 

status: "clarify_complete" OR "clarify_skipped"
  → Recommend: /flow-prd (generate PRD)

status: "prd_complete"
  → Recommend: /flow-tech (generate technical design)
  → Alternative: /flow-ui (generate UI prototype, optional)

status: "tech_design_complete"
  → If UI not done: /flow-ui (optional)
  → Else: /flow-epic (generate EPIC and TASKS)

status: "epic_complete"
  → Recommend: /flow-dev (TDD development, Autonomous mode default)
  → Alternative: /flow-dev --manual (Manual mode for complex requi

cc-devflow-orchestrator

Como adicionar

Cole no README do seu repo

Skills relacionadas

security-research

security-scanning-security-dependencies

vulnerability-scanner

dependency-management-deps-audit

Receba novas skills de Segurança toda segunda