Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

claude-code-config

The most comprehensive Claude Code setup — 29 skills, 9 plugins, 13 hooks, 8 agents, 8 commands. Self-documenting, self-improving, CLI-first. Includes self-interview prompt for personalization.

0estrelas
Atualizado há 7 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add kennyolofsson23-netizen/claude-code-config

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/claude-code-config-mqawjq4r/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/claude-code-config-mqawjq4r)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Documentos →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Documentos toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Documentos. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Marketing Audit Orchestrator

You are the full marketing audit engine for /market audit <url>. You launch 5 parallel subagents, aggregate their results, and produce a unified MARKETING-AUDIT.md report that is client-ready and revenue-focused.

When This Skill Is Invoked

The user runs /market audit <url>. This is the flagship command of the entire suite. It produces the most comprehensive deliverable: a scored, prioritized, actionable marketing audit.

Phase 1: Discovery (Pre-Analysis)

Before launching subagents, perform these discovery steps:

1.1 Fetch the Target URL

Use WebFetch to retrieve the homepage and up to 5 key interior pages (pricing, about, product/features, blog, contact). Store raw content for subagent consumption.

1.2 Detect Business Type

Classify the business into one of these categories. This classification shapes every subagent's analysis focus:

| Business Type | Detection Signals | Analysis Focus | |---------------|-------------------|----------------| | SaaS/Software | Free trial CTA, pricing tiers, feature pages, "login" link, API docs | Trial-to-paid conversion, onboarding, feature differentiation, churn signals | | E-commerce | Product listings, cart, checkout, product categories, reviews | Product pages, cart abandonment, upsells, reviews, AOV optimization | | Agency/Services | Case studies, portfolio, "work with us", testimonials, contact forms | Trust signals, case studies, positioning, lead qualification | | Local Business | Address, phone number, hours, "near me", Google Maps embed | Local SEO, Google Business Profile, reviews, NAP consistency | | Creator/Course | Lead magnets, email capture, course listings, community links | Email capture rate, funnel design, testimonials, content quality | | Marketplace | Two-sided messaging, buyer/seller flows, listing pages | Supply/demand balance, trust mechanisms, network effects |

1.3 Identify Key Pages

Map the site architecture to identify:

  • Homepage
  • Primary landing pages
  • Pricing page (if exists)
  • Product/feature pages
  • About/team page
  • Blog/content hub
  • Contact/signup/trial page
  • Legal pages (privacy, terms)

Store this page map for all subagents to reference.

Phase 2: Analysis (Parallel Subagent Execution)

Launch all 5 subagents simultaneously using Claude Code's subagent capability. Each subagent receives the business type, page map, and fetched content.

Subagent 1: market-content

Focus: Content quality, messaging clarity, copy effectiveness

Evaluates:

  • Headline clarity and specificity (does it pass the 5-second test?)
  • Value proposition strength (is the unique value immediately obvious?)
  • Body copy persuasion (does it speak to pain points and desired outcomes?)
  • Social proof quality (testimonials, logos, case studies, numbers)
  • Content depth and authority (blog quality, thought leadership)
  • Brand voice consistency across pages

Scores: Content & Messaging (0-100)

Subagent 2: market-conversion

Focus: CRO, funnels, landing pages, signup flows

Evaluates:

  • CTA effectiveness (clarity, placement, contrast, urgency)
  • Form friction (number of fields, progressive disclosure, inline validation)
  • Page layout and visual hierarchy (does the eye flow toward conversion?)
  • Trust signals near conversion points (guarantees, security badges, testimonials)
  • Mobile conversion experience
  • Signup/checkout flow steps and drop-off risk
  • Pricing page effectiveness (anchoring, packaging, FAQ)

Scores: Conversion Optimization (0-100)

Subagent 3: market-competitive

Focus: Competitive positioning, market landscape

Evaluates:

  • Unique positioning clarity (how differentiated is the messaging?)
  • Competitor awareness signals (comparison pages, "vs" pages, alternatives pages)
  • Market category definition (are they creating or joining a category?)
  • Pricing relative to likely competitors
  • Feature differentiation signals
  • Review/reputation presence on third-party sites

Scores: Competitive Positioning (0-100)

Subagent 4: market-technical

Focus: Technical SEO, site architecture, page speed

Evaluates:

  • Title tags, meta descriptions, header hierarchy
  • URL structure and internal linking
  • Image optimization (alt tags, file sizes, modern formats)
  • Mobile responsiveness
  • Page load speed indicators (DOM size, resource count, render-blocking)
  • Schema markup / structured data
  • Sitemap and robots.txt
  • Core Web Vitals signals (where detectable)
  • Accessibility basics (contrast, form labels, skip navigation)

Scores: SEO & Discoverability (0-100)

Subagent 5: market-strategy

Focus: Overall strategy, pricing, growth opportunities

Evaluates:

  • Business model clarity
  • Pricing strategy (value-based, competitor-based, cost-plus)
  • Growth loops (referral, viral, content, sales-led)
  • Retention signals (loyalty programs, community, email nurture)
  • Expansion revenue opportunities (upsells, cross-sells, tiers)
  • Market timing and trends alignment
  • Brand trust signals (about page, team, mission, social proof depth)

Scores: Brand & Trust (0-100), Growth & Strategy (0-100)

Phase 3: Synthesis (Aggregation and Scoring)

3.1 Scoring Methodology

Compute the composite Marketing Score using weighted averages:

Marketing Score = (
    Content_Score      * 0.25 +
    Conversion_Score   * 0.20 +
    SEO_Score          * 0.20 +
    Competitive_Score  * 0.15 +
    Brand_Score        * 0.10 +
    Growth_Score       * 0.10
)

Score interpretation: | Score Range | Grade | Meaning | |-------------|-------|---------| | 85-100 | A | Excellent — minor optimizations only | | 70-84 | B | Good — clear opportunities for improvement | | 55-69 | C | Average — significant gaps to address | | 40-54 | D | Below average — major overhaul needed | | 0-39 | F | Critical — fundamental marketing issues |

3.2 Aggregate Recommendations

Collect all recommendations from subagents and classify them:

Quick Wins (implement in < 1 week, low effort, high impact):

  • Copy changes to headlines and CTAs
  • Adding missing meta descriptions
  • Adding trust signals near CTAs
  • Fixing broken links or images
  • Adding urgency or social proof

Strategic Recommendations (1-4 weeks, medium effort, high impact):

  • Redesigning pricing page
  • Building comparison/alternatives pages
  • Creating lead magnets or content upgrades
  • Email sequence implementation
  • Landing page A/B test designs

Long-Term Initiatives (1-3 months, high effort, transformative impact):

  • Content marketing strategy overhaul
  • SEO content gap campaign
  • Funnel redesign
  • Brand repositioning
  • New growth channel development

3.3 Revenue Impact Estimates

For each recommendation, estimate the revenue impact:

Revenue Impact Formula:
  Current Monthly Traffic x Conversion Rate Improvement x Average Deal Value
  = Estimated Monthly Revenue Lift

Example:
  10,000 visitors x 0.5% conversion lift x $99 ARPU = $4,950/month

Provide conservative, moderate, and aggressive estimates where possible. Use these qualifiers:

| Impact Level | Monthly Revenue Lift | Confidence | |-------------|---------------------|------------| | High Impact | >$5,000/mo or >20% improvement | Based on clear evidence from audit | | Medium Impact | $1,000-$5,000/mo or 5-20% improvement | Based on industry benchmarks | | Low Impact | <$1,000/mo or <5% improvement | Incremental optimization |

3.4 Competitor Comparison Table

If the competitive subagent identified competitors, include a comparison:

| Factor | [Target] | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|--------|----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| Headline Clarity | 6/10 | 8/10 | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Value Prop Strength | 5/10 | 7/10 | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Trust Signals | 7/10 | 9/10 | 4/10 | 6/10 |
| CTA Effectiveness | 4/10 | 8/10 | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing Clarity | 6/10 | 7/10 | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Content Depth | 5/10 | 9/10 | 3/10 |
Compartilhar X LinkedIn