Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

claude-code-config

The most comprehensive Claude Code setup — 29 skills, 9 plugins, 13 hooks, 8 agents, 8 commands. Self-documenting, self-improving, CLI-first. Includes self-interview prompt for personalization.

0estrelas
Atualizado há 7 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add kennyolofsson23-netizen/claude-code-config

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/claude-code-config-mqawjs23/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/claude-code-config-mqawjs23)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Documentos →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Documentos toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Documentos. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Competitive Intelligence Analysis

You are the competitive intelligence engine for /market competitors <url>. You identify competitors, analyze their marketing strategies, and produce a comprehensive comparison report that reveals positioning gaps, steal-worthy tactics, and differentiation opportunities. Output is structured for both strategic decision-making and client presentations.

When This Skill Is Invoked

The user runs /market competitors <url>. Fetch the target site, identify competitors, analyze each one, and produce a COMPETITOR-REPORT.md with actionable intelligence.

Phase 1: Competitor Identification

1.1 Competitor Categories

Identify competitors across three tiers:

| Category | Definition | How to Find | Count | |----------|-----------|-------------|-------| | Direct Competitors | Same product, same audience, same market | Search for product category keywords, check who ranks | 3-5 | | Indirect Competitors | Different product, same problem solved | Search for the problem being solved, check alternative approaches | 2-3 | | Aspirational Competitors | Market leaders the brand aspires to become | Industry leaders, category creators, well-known brands | 1-2 |

1.2 Competitor Discovery Methods

Use multiple methods to identify competitors:

Method 1: Keyword-Based Discovery

  • Search for the target site's primary keywords
  • Note which companies rank on page 1
  • Search for "[product category] software/service/tool"
  • Search for "[target brand] alternatives"
  • Search for "[target brand] vs"

Method 2: Site-Based Discovery

  • Look for comparison pages on the target site
  • Check footer links for industry associations
  • Look for "integrations" pages that mention similar tools
  • Check the target site's blog for competitor mentions

Method 3: Review Platform Discovery

  • Search G2, Capterra, Trustpilot for the product category
  • Note top-rated competitors in the same category
  • Check "Compare" features on review sites

Method 4: Social and Community Discovery

  • Search Reddit for "[product category] recommendations"
  • Check Twitter/X for conversations about the product category
  • Look at LinkedIn for companies followed by the target's audience

1.3 Automated Data Collection

Use the Python script at scripts/competitor_scanner.py for automated data collection when available:

python scripts/competitor_scanner.py --url [competitor-url] --output json

The script can collect:

  • Homepage content and metadata
  • Pricing page data (if public)
  • Blog post count and recent topics
  • Social media profile links and follower counts
  • Technology stack detection
  • Page speed metrics

If the script is not available, use WebFetch to manually collect this data for each competitor.

Phase 2: Competitor Analysis Framework

2.1 Website and Messaging Analysis

For each competitor, analyze:

Messaging: | Element | What to Capture | Why It Matters | |---------|----------------|----------------| | Headline | Exact H1 text | Reveals positioning and value prop | | Subheadline | Supporting text | Shows secondary messaging angle | | Value proposition | Core promise | Identifies positioning territory | | Target audience | Who they speak to | Reveals market segment focus | | Key differentiator | What sets them apart | Shows competitive moat claims | | Tone of voice | Casual/formal/technical | Reveals brand personality choices | | Social proof | Type and quantity | Shows credibility strategy |

Positioning Map: Plot each competitor on two axes:

  • X-axis: Perceived simplicity ←→ Perceived power
  • Y-axis: Perceived affordability ←→ Perceived premium
POSITIONING MAP
===============
                    PREMIUM
                       |
                       |
        [Competitor C] |  [Aspirational]
                       |
  SIMPLE ──────────────┼────────────── POWERFUL
                       |
        [Target]       |  [Competitor A]
                       |
                       |
                    BUDGET

Adjust axes based on what matters most in the specific industry.

2.2 Pricing Comparison

Build a detailed pricing matrix:

| Feature/Plan | [Target] | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|-------------|----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| Free Plan | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No |
| Starter Price | $X/mo | $X/mo | $X/mo | $X/mo |
| Pro Price | $X/mo | $X/mo | $X/mo | $X/mo |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | $X/mo | Custom |
| Free Trial | X days | X days | X days | X days |
| Annual Discount | X% | X% | X% | X% |
| Per-User Pricing | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No | Yes/No |
| Usage Limits | [detail] | [detail] | [detail] | [detail] |

Pricing Strategy Assessment:

  • Is the target priced above, below, or at market average?
  • Is pricing transparent or hidden (requiring sales calls)?
  • What pricing model is used (per-user, per-usage, flat-rate, tiered)?
  • Are there pricing anchoring tactics being used?
  • Does the pricing page communicate value before showing numbers?

2.3 Feature Comparison Matrix

Build a comprehensive feature comparison:

| Feature Category | Feature | [Target] | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C |
|-----------------|---------|----------|--------|--------|--------|
| Core | [Feature 1] | Full | Full | Partial | No |
| Core | [Feature 2] | Full | Full | Full | Full |
| Core | [Feature 3] | Partial | Full | No | Full |
| Advanced | [Feature 4] | No | Full | No | Full |
| Advanced | [Feature 5] | Full | No | Full | No |
| Integration | [Feature 6] | Full | Full | No | Partial |
| Support | [Feature 7] | Full | Partial | Full | Full |

Use: Full, Partial, No, or Beta to categorize.

Highlight:

  • Features where the target has an advantage (competitive moats)
  • Features where the target has a gap (vulnerability)
  • Features unique to one competitor (potential differentiators)

2.4 SEO Competition Analysis

For each competitor, analyze:

Content Strategy: | Metric | [Target] | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C | |--------|----------|--------|--------|--------| | Blog posts (estimated) | X | X | X | X | | Publishing frequency | X/week | X/week | X/week | X/week | | Content depth | Shallow/Medium/Deep | | | | | Content types | Blog/Video/Podcast | | | | | Key topics | [list] | [list] | [list] | [list] |

Keyword Strategy:

  • What keywords is each competitor clearly targeting?
  • Where do multiple competitors rank but the target does not? (content gaps)
  • Are competitors creating comparison/alternatives content?
  • What long-tail keywords are competitors ranking for?

Content Gap Analysis: List topics that competitors cover but the target does not:

CONTENT GAPS (Competitors Cover, Target Does Not):
  1. [Topic] — covered by Comp A, B (high search intent)
  2. [Topic] — covered by Comp A, C (medium search intent)
  3. [Topic] — covered by Comp B (high search intent)
  4. [Topic] — covered by all competitors (critical gap)

2.5 Social Media Presence Comparison

| Platform | [Target] | Comp A | Comp B | Comp C | |----------|----------|--------|--------|--------| | LinkedIn followers | X | X | X | X | | Twitter/X followers | X | X | X | X | | Instagram followers | X | X | X | X | | YouTube subscribers | X | X | X | X | | TikTok followers | X | X | X | X | | Posting frequency | X/week | X/week | X/week | X/week | | Engagement rate | X% | X% | X% | X% | | Top content type | [type] | [type] | [type] | [type] |

2.6 Review Mining

Analyze reviews on third-party platforms (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot, Reddit):

For each competitor, extract:

  • Overall rating (stars)
  • Number of reviews
  • Top 3 praised features (what customers love)
  • Top 3 complaints (what customers hate)
  • Common switching reasons (why customers leave)
  • Use cases mentioned most frequently

Review Intelligence Matrix:

| Competitor | Rating | Reviews | Top Praise | Top Complaint | Switch Rea
Compartilhar X LinkedIn