Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

Claude-Red

claude-red é uma biblioteca selecionada de habilidades de segurança ofensiva projetada para o sistema de skills do Claude. Cada skill é um arquivo SKILL.md estruturado que prepara o Claude com metodologia de nível especialista para uma superfície de ataque específica — de SQLi a shellcode, evasão de EDR a desenvolvimento de exploits.

2.4kestrelas
Atualizado há 5 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add SnailSploit/Claude-Red

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/claude-red-mpshli8i/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/claude-red-mpshli8i)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Dados e Análise →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Dados e Análise toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Dados e Análise. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

SKILL: Week 7: Defeating Windows Security Boundaries

Metadata

  • Skill Name: windows-boundaries
  • Folder: offensive-windows-boundaries
  • Source: https://github.com/SnailSploit/offensive-checklist/blob/main/7-windows-boundaries.md

Description

Windows security boundary taxonomy and attack surface enumeration: kernel/user boundary, sandbox boundaries (LPAC, AppContainer), COM/RPC boundaries, hypervisor boundary, trust level transitions. Use when planning privilege escalation paths, sandbox escapes, or understanding Windows security architecture.

Trigger Phrases

Use this skill when the conversation involves any of: Windows boundaries, security boundary, kernel user boundary, sandbox escape, AppContainer, LPAC, COM boundary, RPC boundary, hypervisor, Hyper-V, privilege escalation, trust level

Instructions for Claude

When this skill is active:

  1. Load and apply the full methodology below as your operational checklist
  2. Follow steps in order unless the user specifies otherwise
  3. For each technique, consider applicability to the current target/context
  4. Track which checklist items have been completed
  5. Suggest next steps based on findings

Full Methodology

Week 7: Defeating Windows Security Boundaries

Overview

_created by AnotherOne from @Pwn3rzs Telegram channel_.

Week 6 taught you how mitigations work defensively. You'll learn to bypass the OS security _policies and features_ that prevent your code from running, your processes from accessing protected resources, and your actions from being logged. This is distinct from Week 8, which teaches you how to bypass _exploit mitigations_ (DEP, ASLR, CFG) once your code is already running.

Week 7 vs Week 8 - The Key Distinction:
- Week 7 answers: _"Can my code execute at all?"_ - bypass AMSI, WDAC, ASR, AppContainers, integrity levels, PPL, ETW telemetry
- Week 8 answers: _"Can my exploit succeed?"_ - bypass DEP, ASLR, stack cookies, CFG/XFG, heap safe-unlinking

This Week's Focus:

  • Offensive reconnaissance and mitigation fingerprinting
  • AMSI bypass and script-based attack techniques
  • Protected Process Light (PPL) exploitation
  • Sandbox, integrity level, and AppContainer bypass
  • WDAC and Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) bypass
  • ETW manipulation and telemetry blinding
  • Kernel driver interaction fundamentals (preparation for Week 11)

Prerequisites:

  • Completed Week 6: Understanding Modern Windows Mitigations
  • Week 5: Basic exploitation techniques (stack overflow, ROP, heap)
  • Familiarity with WinDbg, x64dbg, and IDA/Ghidra
  • C/C++, Python, and assembly knowledge

Week 7 Deliverables

By the end of this week, you should have completed:

  • [ ] Recon Tool: Built a mitigation fingerprinting tool
  • [ ] AMSI Bypass: Implemented working AMSI bypass techniques
  • [ ] PPL Research: Documented PPL bypass vectors
  • [ ] Sandbox Escape: Bypassed AppContainer or integrity level restrictions
  • [ ] WDAC/ASR Bypass: Demonstrated at least one WDAC and one ASR bypass
  • [ ] ETW Blinding: Implemented ETW provider patching to suppress telemetry
  • [ ] Driver IOCTL Lab: Loaded a test driver, sent an IOCTL, set a kernel breakpoint (Week 11 prep)

Day 1: Offensive Reconnaissance & Mitigation Fingerprinting

Deliverables

  • [ ] Build a comprehensive mitigation scanner
  • [ ] Fingerprint process-level protections remotely
  • [ ] Identify unprotected/legacy binaries on target
  • [ ] Map kernel mitigation status

Target Mitigation Landscape

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              Offensive Reconnaissance: What to Enumerate        │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                 │
│  SYSTEM-LEVEL                    PROCESS-LEVEL                  │
│  ─────────────                   ─────────────                  │
│  ┌──────────────┐               ┌──────────────┐                │
│  │ VBS/HVCI     │               │ DEP/NX       │                │
│  │ WDAC/CI      │               │ ASLR         │                │
│  │ Secure Boot  │               │ CFG/XFG      │                │
│  │ Credential   │               │ CET/Shadow   │                │
│  │   Guard      │               │ ACG          │                │
│  │ KDP          │               │ CIG          │                │
│  │ KASLR        │               │ Child Process│                │
│  └──────────────┘               └──────────────┘                │
│         │                              │                        │
│         ▼                              ▼                        │
│  Determines:                    Determines:                     │
│  - Kernel exploit              - Shellcode execution            │
│    feasibility                 - Code injection                 │
│  - Driver loading              - ROP requirements               │
│  - Credential theft            - Process hollowing              │
│                                                                 │
│  ATTACK SURFACE MAPPING                                         │
│  ─────────────────────                                          │
│  ├── Unprotected legacy binaries (no ASLR/DEP)                  │
│  ├── Signed but vulnerable drivers (BYOVD)                      │
│  ├── Processes running without ACG/CFG                          │
│  └── Kernel version -> known vulnerabilities                    │
│                                                                 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Mitigation Scanner

This scanner enumerates security boundaries on a Windows target. Why this matters: Before exploiting a target, you need to know which mitigations are active.

// unified_recon.c
// Combines system, process, binary, and policy analysis
// Compile: cl src\unified_recon.c /Fe:bin\unified_recon.exe advapi32.lib

#include <windows.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <tlhelp32.h>

// PE DLL Characteristics flags
#define IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_HIGH_ENTROPY_VA    0x0020
#define IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_DYNAMIC_BASE       0x0040
#define IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NX_COMPAT          0x0100
#define IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_NO_SEH             0x0400
#define IMAGE_DLLCHARACTERISTICS_GUARD_CF           0x4000

void CheckSystemMitigations() {
    printf("\n=== SYSTEM-LEVEL MITIGATIONS ===\n\n");

    // Check VBS/HVCI via registry (more reliable than WMI)
    printf("[*] Checking VBS/HVCI status...\n");
Compartilhar X LinkedIn