← Voltar para o catálogo
Avaliação estruturada da qualidade do código com formato Conventional Comments, profundidade de revisão escalonada e vereditos de soft-gating que preservam a autonomia do usuário.
Ver no GitHub ↗
Copiar URL do repo
Copiar link do SKILL.md Licença: MIT
Como adicionar
Copiar comando
/plugin marketplace add a5c-ai/babysitter
O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.
Para o autor da skill
Cole no README do seu repo
Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.
[](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/code-review-a5c-ai)
Copiar snippet
利用AI大模型，一键生成高清短视频 Generate short videos with one click using AI LLM.
Automação
por harry0703
Creates an SVG weather card showing the current temperature for Dubai. Writes the SVG to orchestration-workflow/weather.svg and updates orchestration-workflow/output.md.
Automação
#ai
por shanraisshan
Automate Asana tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): tasks, projects, sections, teams, workspaces. Always search tools first for current schemas.
Automação
#git
#github
por sickn33
Integrate Stripe, PayPal, and payment processors. Handles checkout flows, subscriptions, webhooks, and PCI compliance. Use PROACTIVELY when implementing payments, billing, or subscription features.
Automação
#git
#github
por sickn33
Alerta por categoria
1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Automação. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.
Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.
Ler descrição completa Recolher descrição Code Review
Overview
Assess code quality, design, correctness, and maintainability through a structured 9-step review workflow. Uses Conventional Comments format with file-specific references.
When to Use
After implementation phase completes When reviewing code changes before merge As part of the /review-code command Process
Identify modified files via git Assess change magnitude for review depth Execute 9-step review: context, correctness, design, testing, security flags, operations, maintainability Synthesize findings in standardized report Deliver verdict with rationale Review Depth Scaling
Under 200 lines: full detail review 200-1000 lines: focused review on critical areas Over 1000 lines: architectural-level review only Verdicts
APPROVE : Ready for security reviewAPPROVE WITH NITS : Non-blocking suggestions onlyREQUEST CHANGES : Blocking issues exist (user may override)Key Rules
Provide specific file paths and line numbers Include at least one positive comment per review Use Conventional Comments format with decorations Explain reasoning, not just observations Limit critical issues to top 5 per category Reviews are soft gates preserving user autonomy Tool Use
Invoke via babysitter process: methodologies/rpikit/rpikit-review
Compartilhar
X
LinkedIn
Copiar link
