Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

competitive-analysis

Framework for competitive landscape analysis across any industry. Use when creating competitor analysis, market positioning assessments, investment memos, strategic reviews, or any analysis requiring systematic evaluation of competitive dynamics. Triggers include requests for competitive landscape decks, peer comparisons, market structure analysis, strategic positioning assessments, and investment

72estrelas
Atualizado há 8 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/competitive-analysis-w95/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/competitive-analysis-w95)
#ai

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Documentos →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Documentos toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Documentos. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Competitive Landscape Mapping

CRITICAL STANDARDS - APPLY TO EVERY ANALYSIS

Source File Primacy

When source files (Excel/CSV) are provided:

  • Extract values DIRECTLY — Do not perform your own calculations; use the numbers as they appear
  • Maintain consistency — When the same metric appears in multiple places, ensure identical values throughout
  • Verify calculations — If the prompt asks you to calculate something, verify your result matches related data in the source
  • Round only as shown — Use the same decimal precision as the source file

Prompt Fidelity

When the prompt specifies exact requirements, follow them verbatim:

Slide Titles & Section Names:

  • If prompt says "Overview and Competitive Scope" slide — use EXACTLY that title, not a paraphrase
  • If prompt says within the "Segment Mix" section — use EXACTLY "Segment Mix" as the section header
  • Never substitute with creative alternatives (e.g., don't use "FY2024 Segment Contribution Analysis" when "Overview and Competitive Scope" was specified)

Chart vs Table:

  • If prompt says embedded chart — create an actual PowerPoint chart object, NOT a table
  • If prompt says data labels must display — these go on chart elements (bars, slices, lines), not table cells
  • Tables and charts are NOT interchangeable — use exactly what's specified

Complete Data Series:

  • If prompt lists 7 competitors, include ALL 7 — not 5 or 6
  • If prompt shows data for years 2015-2025, include ALL years — not a subset
  • If prompt specifies 6 series in a chart (Uber, Lyft, DiDi, Bolt, Grab, Gojek), include ALL 6 — not 4

Exact Values & Phrasing:

  • If prompt says Revenue: $43.98B (+18% YoY) — display exactly that format
  • If prompt says surpasses DoorDash 4:1, Lyft 8:1 — use those exact ratios, not "7.6x Lyft"
  • If prompt gives specific percentages (e.g., "Uber 30%, DiDi 35%"), use exactly those numbers

When in doubt: Re-read the prompt. If it specifies something explicitly, that's not a suggestion — it's a requirement.

Reference Files

This skill includes reference files in the references/ folder. Use them as follows:

  • references/schemas.md — Table templates for M&A transactions, scenario analysis, and slide structure. Reference when building financial tables or investment scenarios.
  • references/frameworks.md — 2x2 matrix axis pairs by industry. Reference when choosing positioning visualization dimensions.

Source Quality Hierarchy

When sources conflict, prioritize in this order:

  1. 10-Ks / Annual Reports — Audited, highest reliability
  2. Earnings Calls / Investor Presentations — Management commentary, forward guidance
  3. Sell-Side Research — Analyst estimates, useful for private company sizing
  4. Industry Reports (McKinsey, Gartner, etc.) — Market sizing, trends
  5. News Articles — Use only for recent developments, verify against primary sources

Data Comparability

  • Time periods must match — All competitor metrics from same fiscal year. Flag exceptions: "(FY24)" vs "(H1 2024)"
  • Metric definitions must match — Same calculation methodology across competitors
  • Currency normalization — Convert all figures to USD for international comparisons; note exchange rate and date used
  • Use "-" for missing data — Never leave cells blank; for private companies, use "N/A" or estimates with "[E]" flag
  • Cite every number — Format: "[Company] [Document] ([Date])"
  • Source file fidelity — When Excel/CSV files are provided, use values exactly as given; do not recalculate or round differently than shown

Design & Formatting

  • Slide titles = insights — "Scale leaders pulling away from niche players" not "Competitive Analysis"
  • Slide titles must fit — One or two lines fine, but no overflow; reduce font size if needed (min 24pt)
  • Signposts = quantified — "margin below 40%" not "margins decline"
  • Ratings include actuals — "●●● $160B" not just "●●●"
  • Slide numbers required — Every slide must have a page number

Presentation-Specific Requirements

  • Actual embedded charts required — Pie charts, bar charts, and line graphs must be real PowerPoint chart objects (created via pptx skill), NOT text/ASCII representations
  • Match prompt structure — If prompt specifies slide structure, follow it
  • Competitor tables — For comprehensive analysis: metrics table + qualitative table per competitor. For rapid assessments: single combined table is acceptable.
  • Segment financials — Include both Revenue AND EBITDA when available. For private competitors or limited disclosure, revenue-only tables are acceptable; note "[EBITDA not disclosed]"

Visual Reference

Review examples/Toast_Embedded_Payments_Competitive_Landscape_v3.pptx and match its professional quality:

Spacing & Overflow Prevention:

  • Title-to-content gap — Minimum 0.4" between slide title bottom and first content element
  • Section header gaps — Minimum 0.25" between section headers and content below
  • Element buffers — Minimum 0.2" between any two elements (tables, text boxes, charts)
  • Margin safety — Keep all content at least 0.5" from slide edges
  • Text overflow — If text doesn't fit, reduce font size or split across slides; never let text clip or overlap

Slide Titles:

  • Must fit within slide width — One or two lines is fine, but text must not overflow or clip
  • If title is too long — Shorten wording or reduce font size (minimum 24pt)
  • Front-load the insight — Put the key point first, details second

Chart Formatting:

  • Legend inside layout — Always set include_in_layout=True so legends don't overlap chart area
  • Legend position — Use RIGHT for pie charts (≤6 items), BOTTOM for line/bar charts (≤4 series)
  • Too many series — If >6 series, consider splitting into multiple charts or using a table instead
  • Data labels — For pie charts, show percentages on slices rather than relying solely on legend

Typography (set explicitly, never use defaults):

  • Slide title: 28-32pt bold
  • Section headers: 16-20pt bold
  • Body text: 11-14pt regular
  • Table text: 10-12pt regular
  • Sources/footnotes: 8-10pt, gray
  • Consistency rule: Same element type = same font size throughout deck

Layout:

  • Clean grid alignment — tables and text blocks align to consistent margins
  • Generous whitespace — don't crowd slides; let content breathe
  • Visual hierarchy — most important insight is largest/most prominent
  • One key message per slide — supporting detail below

Color:

  • Limited palette — 2-3 colors max (one accent color for emphasis)
  • Muted tones — avoid bright/saturated colors; use navy, gray, muted blue
  • Consistent application — same color meanings throughout (e.g., accent for key metrics)

Tables:

  • Light gray header row with bold text
  • Alternating row shading (subtle) or clean white with thin borders
  • Right-align numbers, left-align text
  • Adequate cell padding — text shouldn't touch borders

Rating visuals:

  • ●●● / ●●○ / ●○○ system with actual metric alongside
  • Consistent placement in comparative tables

Adapt structure and metrics to fit your industry — but maintain this level of polish.

What's STRICT vs FLEXIBLE

| STRICT (Every Time) | FLEXIBLE (Case-by-Case) | |---------------------|------------------------| | Exact titles/sections when prompt specifies | Creative titles when prompt doesn't specify | | Chart when prompt says chart; table when prompt says table | Visualization type when prompt doesn't specify | | All data points/competitors listed in prompt | Number of competitors when prompt doesn't specify | | Exact values/ratios when prompt specifies them | Rounding when prompt doesn't specify precision | | Titles fit without overflow | Number of competitor categories | | Minimum spacing between elements | Which dimensions to compare | | Chart legends inside layout | Number of competitors profiled | | No overlapping text/el

Compartilhar X LinkedIn