S Skillteca
Receber por email
Explorar Categorias Coleções Newsletter
← Voltar para o catálogo

doc-review

Desenvolvimento Autor: sd0xdev

Document review via Codex MCP. Use when: reviewing .md docs, tech spec audit, document quality check. Not for: code review (use codex-code-review), test review (use test-review). Output: 5-dimension rating table + gate.

172estrelas
Atualizado há 5 meses
Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flow

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/doc-review/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/doc-review)
#ai #mcp #test

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Desenvolvimento →

claude-api

153.1k

Build, debug, and optimize Claude API / Anthropic SDK apps. Apps built with this skill should include prompt caching. Also handles migrating existing Claude API code between Claude model versions (4.5 → 4.6, 4.6 → 4.7, retired-model replacements). TRIGGER when: code imports `anthropic`/`@anthropic-ai/sdk`; user asks for the Claude API, Anthropic SDK, or Managed Agents; user adds/modifies/tunes a C

Desenvolvimento #ai #api por anthropics

skill-creator

153.1k

Crie novas skills, modifique e aprimore as existentes, e meça seu desempenho. Utilize para desenvolver, editar, otimizar, testar e comparar skills, além de refinar suas descrições para maior precisão de acionamento.

Desenvolvimento #test por anthropics

claude-code-plugin-release

83.4k

Fluxo de trabalho automatizado de versionamento semântico e lançamento para plugins do Claude Code. Gerencia incrementos de versão em manifestos package.json, marketplace.json, plugin.json, publicação npm (para que npx claude-mem@X.Y.Z seja resolvido), verificação de build, marcação git, lançamentos no GitHub e geração de changelog.

Desenvolvimento #ai #git por thedotmack

claude-mem

83.4k

Contexto Persistente Entre Sessões para Cada Agente – Captura tudo o que seu agente faz durante as sessões, comprime com IA e injeta contexto relevante de volta em sessões futuras. Compatível com Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, Gemini, Hermes, Copilot, OpenCode e mais.

Desenvolvimento #ai por thedotmack

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Desenvolvimento toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Desenvolvimento. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Document Review Skill

Trigger

  • Keywords: review doc, document review, tech spec review, review-spec, doc-refactor, streamline doc

When NOT to Use

  • Code review (use codex-code-review)
  • Test coverage review (use test-review)
  • Just want to read a document (use Read directly)

Commands

| Command | Description | Use Case | | ------------------- | ---------------------- | ----------------- | | /codex-review-doc | Codex reviews .md docs | Document changes | | /review-spec | Review tech spec | Spec confirmation | | /doc-refactor | Streamline documents | Doc too long | | /update-docs | Research & update docs | After code change |

Workflow: /codex-review-doc

Determine target → Read content → Codex review (5 dimensions) → Rating table + Gate → Loop if Needs revision

Step 1: Determine Target File

| Condition | Action | |-----------|--------| | Path specified | Use that path directly | | No path | Auto-detect: git modified .md → staged .md → new .md | | Multiple files | List and ask user which to review |

Step 2: Read File Content

Read target file, save as FILE_CONTENT.

Step 3: Codex Review

First review: mcp__codex__codex with doc review prompt. See references/codex-prompt-doc.md.

Config: sandbox: 'read-only', approval-policy: 'never'

Save the returned threadId.

Loop review: mcp__codex__codex-reply with re-review template. See references/review-loop-doc.md.

Step 4: Consolidate Output

Organize results into rating table + severity-grouped findings + gate.

Review Dimensions

| Dimension | Checks | | ------------------- | ------ | | Architecture Design | System boundaries, responsibilities, dependencies, extensibility | | Performance | Bottlenecks, concurrency, caching, resource usage | | Security | Data leakage, access control, input validation, error handling | | Documentation Quality | Structure, completeness, accuracy, examples, docs-writing standards | | Code Consistency | Pseudocode matches codebase, referenced files exist, technical accuracy |

Review Loop

⚠️ @CLAUDE.md auto-loop: fix → re-review → ... → ✅ PASS ⚠️

⛔ Needs revision → fix 🔴 items → /codex-review-doc --continue <threadId> → repeat until ✅ Mergeable.

Max 3 rounds. Still failing → report blocker.

Verification

  • [ ] Each issue tagged with severity (🔴/🟡/⚪)
  • [ ] Gate is clear (✅ Mergeable / ⛔ Needs revision)
  • [ ] Codex verified code-documentation consistency independently

Required Actions

| Change Type | Must Execute | | ----------- | ------------------------------------- | | .md docs | /codex-review-doc or /review-spec | | Tech spec | /review-spec | | README | /codex-review-doc |

References

  • Doc review prompt: references/codex-prompt-doc.md
  • Review loop: references/review-loop-doc.md
  • Standards: @rules/docs-writing.md

Examples

Input: /codex-review-doc docs/features/xxx/tech-spec.md
Action: Read file → Codex doc prompt → Rating table + Findings + Gate

Input: /codex-review-doc
Action: Auto-detect changed .md → Codex doc prompt → Rating table + Gate

Input: Review this tech spec for me
Action: /review-spec → Check completeness/feasibility/risks → Output Gate

Input: This document is too long, streamline it
Action: /doc-refactor → Tabularize + Mermaid → Output comparison
Compartilhar X LinkedIn