🔧 GitHub Workflow Automation
Patterns for automating GitHub workflows with AI assistance, inspired by Gemini CLI and modern DevOps practices.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Automating PR reviews with AI
- Setting up issue triage automation
- Creating GitHub Actions workflows
- Integrating AI into CI/CD pipelines
- Automating Git operations (rebases, cherry-picks)
1. Automated PR Review
1.1 PR Review Action
# .github/workflows/ai-review.yml
name: AI Code Review
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize]
jobs:
review:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Get changed files
id: changed
run: |
files=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
echo "files<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "$files" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
- name: Get diff
id: diff
run: |
diff=$(git diff origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
echo "diff<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "$diff" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
- name: AI Review
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const { Anthropic } = require('@anthropic-ai/sdk');
const client = new Anthropic({ apiKey: process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY });
const response = await client.messages.create({
model: "claude-3-sonnet-20240229",
max_tokens: 4096,
messages: [{
role: "user",
content: `Review this PR diff and provide feedback:
Changed files: ${{ steps.changed.outputs.files }}
Diff:
${{ steps.diff.outputs.diff }}
Provide:
1. Summary of changes
2. Potential issues or bugs
3. Suggestions for improvement
4. Security concerns if any
Format as GitHub markdown.`
}]
});
await github.rest.pulls.createReview({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
pull_number: context.issue.number,
body: response.content[0].text,
event: 'COMMENT'
});
env:
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
1.2 Review Comment Patterns
# AI Review Structure
## 📋 Summary
Brief description of what this PR does.
## ✅ What looks good
- Well-structured code
- Good test coverage
- Clear naming conventions
## ⚠️ Potential Issues
1. **Line 42**: Possible null pointer exception
```javascript
// Current
user.profile.name;
// Suggested
user?.profile?.name ?? "Unknown";
```
- Line 78: Consider error handling
``javascript // Add try-catch or .catch() ``
💡 Suggestions
- Consider extracting the validation logic into a separate function
- Add JSDoc comments for public methods
🔒 Security Notes
- No sensitive data exposure detected
- API key handling looks correct
### 1.3 Focused Reviews
Review only specific file types
- name: Filter code files
run: | files=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD | \ grep -E '\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx|py|go)$' || true) echo "code_files=$files" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
Review with context
- name: AI Review with context
run: | # Include relevant context files context="" for file in ${{ steps.changed.outputs.files }}; do if [[ -f "$file" ]]; then context+="=== $file ===\n$(cat $file)\n\n" fi done
# Send to AI with full file context
---
## 2. Issue Triage Automation
### 2.1 Auto-label Issues
.github/workflows/issue-triage.yml
name: Issue Triage
on: issues: types: [opened]
jobs: triage: runs-on: ubuntu-latest permissions: issues: write
steps:
- name: Analyze issue
uses: actions/github-script@v7 with: script: | const issue = context.payload.issue;
// Call AI to analyze const analysis = await analyzeIssue(issue.title, issue.body);
// Apply labels const labels = [];
if (analysis.type === 'bug') { labels.push('bug'); if (analysis.severity === 'high') labels.push('priority: high'); } else if (analysis.type === 'feature') { labels.push('enhancement'); } else if (analysis.type === 'question') { labels.push('question'); }
if (analysis.area) { labels.push(area: ${analysis.area}); }
await github.rest.issues.addLabels({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, issue_number: issue.number, labels: labels });
// Add initial response if (analysis.type === 'bug' && !analysis.hasReproSteps) { await github.rest.issues.createComment({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, issue_number: issue.number, body: `Thanks for reporting this issue!
To help us investigate, could you please provide:
- Steps to reproduce the issue
- Expected behavior
- Actual behavior
- Environment (OS, version, etc.)
This will help us resolve your issue faster. 🙏` }); }
### 2.2 Issue Analysis Prompt
const TRIAGE_PROMPT = ` Analyze this GitHub issue and classify it:
Title: {title} Body: {body}
Return JSON with: { "type": "bug" | "feature" | "question" | "docs" | "other", "severity": "low" | "medium" | "high" | "critical", "area": "frontend" | "backend" | "api" | "docs" | "ci" | "other", "summary": "one-line summary", "hasReproSteps": boolean, "isFirstContribution": boolean, "suggestedLabels": ["label1", "label2"], "suggestedAssignees": ["username"] // based on area expertise } `;
### 2.3 Stale Issue Management
.github/workflows/stale.yml
name: Manage Stale Issues
on: schedule:
- cron: "0 0 *" # Daily
jobs: stale: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps:
- uses: actions/stale@v9
with: stale-issue-message: | This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.
If this issue is still relevant:
- Add a comment with an update
- Remove the
stalelabel
Thank you for your contributions! 🙏
stale-pr-message: | This PR has been automatically marked as stale. Please update it or it will be closed in 14 days.
days-before-stale: 60 days-before-close: 14 stale-issue-label: "stale" stale-pr-label: "stale" exempt-issue-labels: "pinned,security,in-progress" exempt-pr-labels: "pinned,security"
---
## 3. CI/CD Integration
### 3.1 Smart Test Selection
.github/workflows/smart-tests.yml
name: Smart Test Selection
on: pull_request:
jobs: analyze: runs-on: ubuntu-latest outputs: test_suites: ${{ steps.analyze.outputs.suites }}
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with: fetch-depth: 0
- name: Analyze changes
id: analyze run: | # Get changed files changed=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
# Determine which test suites