Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats caching as a system design decision. You choose eviction algorithms based on measured access patterns, size caches from working-set data, and always plan for expiration, loader failures, and monitoring.
Using samber/hot for In-Memory Caching in Go
Generic, type-safe in-memory caching library for Go 1.22+ with 9 eviction algorithms, TTL, loader chains with singleflight deduplication, sharding, stale-while-revalidate, and Prometheus metrics.
Official Resources:
This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. Context7 can help as a discoverability platform.
go get -u github.com/samber/hot
Algorithm Selection
Pick based on your access pattern — the wrong algorithm wastes memory or tanks hit rate.
| Algorithm | Constant | Best for | Avoid when | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | W-TinyLFU | hot.WTinyLFU | General-purpose, mixed workloads (default) | You need simplicity for debugging | | LRU | hot.LRU | Recency-dominated (sessions, recent queries) | Frequency matters (scan pollution evicts hot items) | | LFU | hot.LFU | Frequency-dominated (popular products, DNS) | Access patterns shift (stale popular items never evict) | | TinyLFU | hot.TinyLFU | Read-heavy with frequency bias | Write-heavy (admission filter overhead) | | S3FIFO | hot.S3FIFO | High throughput, scan-resistant | Small caches (<1000 items) | | ARC | hot.ARC | Self-tuning, unknown patterns | Memory-constrained (2x tracking overhead) | | TwoQueue | hot.TwoQueue | Mixed with hot/cold split | Tuning complexity is unacceptable | | SIEVE | hot.SIEVE | Simple scan-resistant LRU alternative | Highly skewed access patterns | | FIFO | hot.FIFO | Simple, predictable eviction order | Hit rate matters (no frequency/recency awareness) |
Decision shortcut: Start with hot.WTinyLFU. Switch only when profiling shows the miss rate is too high for your SLO.
For detailed algorithm comparison, benchmarks, and a decision tree, see [Algorithm Guide](./references/algorithm-guide.md).
Core Usage
Basic Cache with TTL
import "github.com/samber/hot"
cache := hot.NewHotCache[string, *User](hot.WTinyLFU, 10_000).
WithTTL(5 * time.Minute).
WithJanitor().
Build()
defer cache.StopJanitor()
cache.Set("user:123", user)
cache.SetWithTTL("session:abc", session, 30*time.Minute)
value, found, err := cache.Get("user:123")
Loader Pattern (Read-Through)
Loaders fetch missing keys automatically with singleflight deduplication — concurrent Get() calls for the same missing key share one loader invocation:
cache := hot.NewHotCache[int, *User](hot.WTinyLFU, 10_000).
WithTTL(5 * time.Minute).
WithLoaders(func(ids []int) (map[int]*User, error) {
return db.GetUsersByIDs(ctx, ids) // batch query
}).
WithJanitor().
Build()
defer cache.StopJanitor()
user, found, err := cache.Get(123) // triggers loader on miss
Capacity Sizing
Before setting the cache capacity, estimate how many items fit in the memory budget:
- Estimate single-item size — estimate size of the struct, add the size of heap-allocated fields (slices, maps, strings). Include the key size. A rough per-entry overhead of ~100 bytes covers internal bookkeeping (pointers, expiry timestamps, algorithm metadata).
- Ask the developer how much memory is dedicated to this cache in production (e.g., 256 MB, 1 GB). This depends on the service's total memory and what else shares the process.
- Compute capacity —
capacity = memoryBudget / estimatedItemSize. Round down to leave headroom.
Example: *User struct ~500 bytes + string key ~50 bytes + overhead ~100 bytes = ~650 bytes/entry
256 MB budget → 256_000_000 / 650 ≈ 393,000 items
If the item size is unknown, ask the developer to measure it with a unit test that allocates N items and checks runtime.ReadMemStats. Guessing capacity without measuring leads to OOM or wasted memory.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting
WithJanitor()— without it, expired entries stay in memory until the algorithm evicts them. Always chain.WithJanitor()in the builder anddefer cache.StopJanitor(). - Calling
SetMissing()without missing cache config — panics at runtime. EnableWithMissingCache(algorithm, capacity)orWithMissingSharedCache()in the builder first. WithoutLocking()+WithJanitor()— mutually exclusive, panics.WithoutLocking()is only safe for single-goroutine access without background cleanup.- Oversized cache — a cache holding everything is a map with overhead. Size to your working set (typically 10-20% of total data). Monitor hit rate to validate.
- Ignoring loader errors —
Get()returns(zero, false, err)on loader failure. Always checkerr, not justfound.
Best Practices
- Always set TTL — unbounded caches serve stale data indefinitely because there is no signal to refresh
- Use
WithJitter(lambda, upperBound)to spread expirations — without jitter, items created together expire together, causing thundering herd on the loader - Monitor with
WithPrometheusMetrics(cacheName)— hit rate below 80% usually means the cache is undersized or the algorithm is wrong for the workload - Use
WithCopyOnRead(fn)/WithCopyOnWrite(fn)for mutable values — without copies, callers mutate cached objects and corrupt shared state
For advanced patterns (revalidation, sharding, missing cache, monitoring setup), see [Production Patterns](./references/production-patterns.md).
For the complete API surface, see [API Reference](./references/api-reference.md).
If you encounter a bug or unexpected behavior in samber/hot, open an issue at <https://github.com/samber/hot/issues>.
Cross-References
- → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-performanceskill for general caching strategy and when to use in-memory cache vs Redis vs CDN - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observabilityskill for Prometheus metrics integration and monitoring - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-databaseskill for database query patterns that pair with cache loaders - → See
samber/cc-skills@promql-cliskill for querying Prometheus cache metrics via CLI