Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

golang-samber-hot

Esta skill foca em cache em memória em Golang com samber/hot, cobrindo algoritmos de despejo (LRU, LFU, etc.), TTL, carregadores de cache, sharding, stale-while-revalidate, cache de chaves ausentes e métricas Prometheus. É aplicável ao usar samber/hot ou ao carregar repetidamente recursos de cardinalidade média a baixa.

11estrelas
Atualizado há 6 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: NOASSERTION

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add yzfly/CTO-Skills

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/golang-samber-hot/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/golang-samber-hot)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Desenvolvimento →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Desenvolvimento toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Desenvolvimento. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats caching as a system design decision. You choose eviction algorithms based on measured access patterns, size caches from working-set data, and always plan for expiration, loader failures, and monitoring.

Using samber/hot for In-Memory Caching in Go

Generic, type-safe in-memory caching library for Go 1.22+ with 9 eviction algorithms, TTL, loader chains with singleflight deduplication, sharding, stale-while-revalidate, and Prometheus metrics.

Official Resources:

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. Context7 can help as a discoverability platform.

go get -u github.com/samber/hot

Algorithm Selection

Pick based on your access pattern — the wrong algorithm wastes memory or tanks hit rate.

| Algorithm | Constant | Best for | Avoid when | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | W-TinyLFU | hot.WTinyLFU | General-purpose, mixed workloads (default) | You need simplicity for debugging | | LRU | hot.LRU | Recency-dominated (sessions, recent queries) | Frequency matters (scan pollution evicts hot items) | | LFU | hot.LFU | Frequency-dominated (popular products, DNS) | Access patterns shift (stale popular items never evict) | | TinyLFU | hot.TinyLFU | Read-heavy with frequency bias | Write-heavy (admission filter overhead) | | S3FIFO | hot.S3FIFO | High throughput, scan-resistant | Small caches (<1000 items) | | ARC | hot.ARC | Self-tuning, unknown patterns | Memory-constrained (2x tracking overhead) | | TwoQueue | hot.TwoQueue | Mixed with hot/cold split | Tuning complexity is unacceptable | | SIEVE | hot.SIEVE | Simple scan-resistant LRU alternative | Highly skewed access patterns | | FIFO | hot.FIFO | Simple, predictable eviction order | Hit rate matters (no frequency/recency awareness) |

Decision shortcut: Start with hot.WTinyLFU. Switch only when profiling shows the miss rate is too high for your SLO.

For detailed algorithm comparison, benchmarks, and a decision tree, see [Algorithm Guide](./references/algorithm-guide.md).

Core Usage

Basic Cache with TTL

import "github.com/samber/hot"

cache := hot.NewHotCache[string, *User](hot.WTinyLFU, 10_000).
    WithTTL(5 * time.Minute).
    WithJanitor().
    Build()
defer cache.StopJanitor()

cache.Set("user:123", user)
cache.SetWithTTL("session:abc", session, 30*time.Minute)

value, found, err := cache.Get("user:123")

Loader Pattern (Read-Through)

Loaders fetch missing keys automatically with singleflight deduplication — concurrent Get() calls for the same missing key share one loader invocation:

cache := hot.NewHotCache[int, *User](hot.WTinyLFU, 10_000).
    WithTTL(5 * time.Minute).
    WithLoaders(func(ids []int) (map[int]*User, error) {
        return db.GetUsersByIDs(ctx, ids) // batch query
    }).
    WithJanitor().
    Build()
defer cache.StopJanitor()

user, found, err := cache.Get(123) // triggers loader on miss

Capacity Sizing

Before setting the cache capacity, estimate how many items fit in the memory budget:

  1. Estimate single-item size — estimate size of the struct, add the size of heap-allocated fields (slices, maps, strings). Include the key size. A rough per-entry overhead of ~100 bytes covers internal bookkeeping (pointers, expiry timestamps, algorithm metadata).
  2. Ask the developer how much memory is dedicated to this cache in production (e.g., 256 MB, 1 GB). This depends on the service's total memory and what else shares the process.
  3. Compute capacity — capacity = memoryBudget / estimatedItemSize. Round down to leave headroom.
Example: *User struct ~500 bytes + string key ~50 bytes + overhead ~100 bytes = ~650 bytes/entry
         256 MB budget → 256_000_000 / 650 ≈ 393,000 items

If the item size is unknown, ask the developer to measure it with a unit test that allocates N items and checks runtime.ReadMemStats. Guessing capacity without measuring leads to OOM or wasted memory.

Common Mistakes

  1. Forgetting WithJanitor() — without it, expired entries stay in memory until the algorithm evicts them. Always chain .WithJanitor() in the builder and defer cache.StopJanitor().
  2. Calling SetMissing() without missing cache config — panics at runtime. Enable WithMissingCache(algorithm, capacity) or WithMissingSharedCache() in the builder first.
  3. WithoutLocking() + WithJanitor() — mutually exclusive, panics. WithoutLocking() is only safe for single-goroutine access without background cleanup.
  4. Oversized cache — a cache holding everything is a map with overhead. Size to your working set (typically 10-20% of total data). Monitor hit rate to validate.
  5. Ignoring loader errors — Get() returns (zero, false, err) on loader failure. Always check err, not just found.

Best Practices

  1. Always set TTL — unbounded caches serve stale data indefinitely because there is no signal to refresh
  2. Use WithJitter(lambda, upperBound) to spread expirations — without jitter, items created together expire together, causing thundering herd on the loader
  3. Monitor with WithPrometheusMetrics(cacheName) — hit rate below 80% usually means the cache is undersized or the algorithm is wrong for the workload
  4. Use WithCopyOnRead(fn) / WithCopyOnWrite(fn) for mutable values — without copies, callers mutate cached objects and corrupt shared state

For advanced patterns (revalidation, sharding, missing cache, monitoring setup), see [Production Patterns](./references/production-patterns.md).

For the complete API surface, see [API Reference](./references/api-reference.md).

If you encounter a bug or unexpected behavior in samber/hot, open an issue at <https://github.com/samber/hot/issues>.

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-performance skill for general caching strategy and when to use in-memory cache vs Redis vs CDN
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observability skill for Prometheus metrics integration and monitoring
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-database skill for database query patterns that pair with cache loaders
  • → See samber/cc-skills@promql-cli skill for querying Prometheus cache metrics via CLI
Compartilhar X LinkedIn