Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

inbound-lead-triage

Triages all inbound leads from a given period — demo requests, free trial signups, content downloads, webinar registrations, chatbot conversations. Classifies by urgency, qualifies against ICP, enriches with context, and produces a prioritized action queue with recommended response for each lead. Tool-agnostic — works with any CRM, form tool, or lead source.

744estrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/inbound-lead-triage/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/inbound-lead-triage)
#ai

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Marketing →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Marketing toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Marketing. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Inbound Lead Triage

Pulls all inbound leads from a specified period, classifies them by source urgency, qualifies against ICP, enriches with company/person context, and produces a prioritized action queue. Turns a messy inbox of form fills into a clear "who to call first" list.

When to Auto-Load

Load this composite when:

  • User says "triage my inbound leads", "review new leads", "check demo requests"
  • User wants to process a batch of inbound leads from any period
  • User asks "who should I follow up with first?"
  • A scheduled workflow triggers periodic inbound review

Architecture

[Lead Sources] → Step 1: Collect → Step 2: Classify & Rank → Step 3: Qualify → Step 4: Enrich → Step 5: Route & Respond
                    ↓                    ↓                        ↓                  ↓                    ↓
              Raw lead list      Urgency-ranked list       ICP-scored list    Context-rich list    Action queue + drafts

Each step has a clear input/output contract. Tools are configured once per client, not hardcoded.

Step 0: Configuration (Once Per Client)

On first run, ask the user to configure their lead sources and preferences. Save to the current working directory or wherever the user prefers (e.g., config/inbound-triage.json).

{
  "lead_sources": {
    "demo_requests": {
      "source_tool": "HubSpot | Salesforce | Typeform | CSV | other",
      "access_method": "API | CSV export | MCP tool | manual paste",
      "fields_available": ["name", "email", "company", "title", "message"]
    },
    "free_trial_signups": {
      "source_tool": "product database | Stripe | CSV | other",
      "access_method": "API | CSV export | manual paste",
      "fields_available": ["name", "email", "company", "signup_date", "plan"]
    },
    "content_downloads": {
      "source_tool": "HubSpot | Marketo | CSV | other",
      "access_method": "API | CSV export | manual paste",
      "fields_available": ["name", "email", "company", "content_title", "download_date"]
    },
    "webinar_registrations": {
      "source_tool": "Zoom | Luma | CSV | other",
      "access_method": "API | CSV export | manual paste",
      "fields_available": ["name", "email", "company", "webinar_title", "attended"]
    },
    "chatbot_conversations": {
      "source_tool": "Intercom | Drift | Crisp | CSV | other",
      "access_method": "API | CSV export | manual paste",
      "fields_available": ["name", "email", "company", "conversation_summary", "intent"]
    }
  },
  "urgency_overrides": {},
  "response_preferences": {
    "demo_request_sla": "< 1 hour",
    "trial_signup_sla": "< 4 hours",
    "default_sla": "< 24 hours"
  },
  "qualification_prompt_path": "path/to/existing/qualification-prompt.md or null"
}

On subsequent runs: Load config silently, skip setup.

If user provides a raw CSV or pastes leads inline: Skip source config — just classify what's given.

Step 1: Collect Leads

Input

  • Time period (e.g., "last 24 hours", "this week", "since Monday")
  • Lead sources to check (all configured sources by default, or user specifies)

Process

  1. Pull leads from each configured source for the specified period
  2. Normalize into a common schema regardless of source:
{
  "name": "",
  "email": "",
  "company": "",
  "title": "",           // if available
  "source_type": "",     // demo_request | free_trial | content_download | webinar | chatbot | other
  "source_detail": "",   // which form, which webinar, which content piece
  "timestamp": "",
  "raw_message": "",     // form message, chat transcript, or null
  "raw_fields": {}       // all original fields preserved
}
  1. Deduplicate by email — if same person appears in multiple sources, merge into one record with all source types listed (this is a stronger signal)

Output

  • Normalized lead list with source classification
  • Dedup report: "X leads from Y sources, Z duplicates merged"

Human Checkpoint

Present the collected leads count by source. Ask: "These are the leads I found. Proceed with triage?"

Step 2: Classify & Rank by Urgency

Urgency Tier System

Rank every lead into one of four urgency tiers based on their source type and behavioral signals.

Tier 1 — Respond NOW (< 1 hour SLA)

  • Demo requests (explicit buying intent)
  • Chatbot conversations where the prospect asked about pricing, integration, or implementation
  • Any lead that mentions a competitor by name
  • Any lead that mentions a timeline ("looking to switch by Q2", "evaluating this month")
  • Multi-source leads: appeared in 2+ sources (e.g., downloaded content AND requested demo)

Tier 2 — Respond TODAY (< 4 hours SLA)

  • Free trial signups (active evaluation intent)
  • Chatbot conversations with product questions (not pricing)
  • Webinar attendees who actually attended (not just registered)
  • Content downloads of bottom-funnel content (case studies, ROI calculators, comparison guides, pricing pages)

Tier 3 — Respond within 24 hours

  • Webinar registrants who did NOT attend
  • Content downloads of mid-funnel content (how-to guides, industry reports, templates)
  • Free trial signups with personal email domains (gmail, yahoo — lower commercial intent)

Tier 4 — Batch response / nurture

  • Content downloads of top-funnel content (blog posts, general ebooks, infographics)
  • Webinar registrants for broad/educational topics with no other signal
  • Any lead where company or title is missing and can't be enriched

Signal Boosters (Move Up One Tier)

  • Company matches existing ICP (known good industry, size, stage)
  • Person has a title that maps to buyer persona
  • Company is already in pipeline (existing deal — warm context)
  • Person previously engaged (downloaded other content, attended other webinar)
  • Company was flagged by a signal composite (funding, hiring, leadership change)

Signal Dampeners (Move Down One Tier)

  • Personal email domain with no company info
  • Bot-like behavior (form filled in < 3 seconds, nonsense fields)
  • Existing customer (unless upsell signal — keep at tier but flag differently)
  • Competitor employee (flag separately — competitive intelligence, not a lead)

Urgency Override

If the user configured custom urgency rules in urgency_overrides, apply those after the default classification.

Output

  • Lead list sorted by urgency tier, then by timestamp within each tier
  • Each lead tagged with: urgency_tier, urgency_reason, signal_boosters[], signal_dampeners[]

Step 3: Qualify Against ICP

Process

For each lead, run a lightweight ICP qualification check. This is NOT the full lead-qualification capability — it's a fast pass to separate likely-fit from unlikely-fit.

  1. If a qualification prompt exists (from lead-qualification capability): Apply it in fast mode — check hard disqualifiers only, skip deep enrichment
  2. If no qualification prompt: Use the company context to do a basic fit check:
  3. Does the company size/industry/stage roughly match ICP?
  4. Does the person's title map to a buyer/user persona?
  5. Any obvious disqualifiers? (wrong geography, wrong industry, too small/large)

Qualification Categories

  • Strong fit — Company and person clearly match ICP
  • Likely fit — Partial data but what's available looks good
  • Unknown fit — Not enough data to determine (needs enrichment)
  • Poor fit — Clearly outside ICP (but still log — they came inbound for a reason)
  • Flag: Competitor — Employee of a known competitor
  • Flag: Existing customer — Already a customer (route to CS/upsell, not sales)

Output

  • Each lead tagged with: icp_fit, fit_reasoning (one sentence)
  • Leads with "poor fit" or "flag" categories are separated into a secondary list

Step 4: Enrich with Context

Process

For leads in Tier 1 and Tier 2 (and strong/likely fit Tier 3), gather context that helps the responder have a better conversation.

Company enrichment (per unique company):

Compartilhar X LinkedIn