Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

leak-hunting

This skill should be used when the user mentions "hunt leaks", "find breaches", "credential leaks", "data leak", "breach database", "hunt dumps", "leak finder", "leak hunting", "discover leaks", "breached credentials", "combo list", "combolist", "credential dump", "paste site", "pastebin leak", "breach forums", "BreachForums", "Exploit.in", "RaidForums", "Telegram leaks", "leak channel", "h8mail",

20estrelas
Atualizado há 7 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add ogrodev/fsociety

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/leak-hunting/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/leak-hunting)
#ai

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Dados e Análise →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Dados e Análise toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Dados e Análise. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Leak Hunting

Systematically discover breached credentials, leaked databases, and dumped data related to a target across paste sites, breach forums, dark web markets, Telegram channels, GitHub repos, and breach search APIs. This skill covers already-leaked data — for finding live exposed databases, see the exposed-databases skill.

Workflow

Leak hunting follows five phases. Each phase feeds the next — do not skip triage or you will waste time acquiring junk data.

RECON → HUNT → VALIDATE → TRIAGE → ACQUIRE/HANDOFF
  |        |        |         |           |
  |        |        |         |           +-- open → data-acquisition skill
  |        |        |         |           +-- protected → cross-plugin-pipeline (elliot handoff)
  |        |        |         +-- credibility + freshness + value scoring
  |        |        +-- sample check, domain match, format plausibility
  |        +-- hunt-engine.js (dork, github, forum) + APIs (h8mail, IntelX, HIBP)
  +-- map target surface: domains, emails, brands, subsidiaries

Phase 1: Target Reconnaissance

Before generating any queries, map the target's digital footprint to maximize hunt coverage.

Define the Attack Surface

| Element | How to Find | Example | |---------|------------|---------| | Primary domains | Engagement scope, whois, DNS | corp.com, corp.com.br | | Email patterns | LinkedIn, public org charts, known breach headers | first.last@corp.com, flast@corp.com | | Brand keywords | Company name, products, internal projects, acquisitions | CorpTech, CorpPay, Project Atlas | | Employee emails | TheHarvester, LinkedIn scraping, prior breach samples | jane.doe@corp.com | | Subsidiaries | CNPJ/corporate registries, SEC filings, crunchbase | sub.corp.com, acquired-co.com |

Configure Hunt Profile

node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/hunt-profile.js show
node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/hunt-profile.js set <profile>

The profile controls which source categories are permitted and what timing delays to apply. See OPSEC section below.

Phase 2: Hunt Execution

Execute queries across all source categories, ordered by ROI (signal quality per time invested).

Execution Order

| Priority | Source | Tool / Method | Profile Requirement | |----------|--------|--------------|---------------------| | 1 | Breach search APIs (h8mail, HIBP, IntelX) | CLI / MCP / API | surface+ | | 2 | GitHub secret search | hunt-engine.js github | surface+ | | 3 | Google dorks (paste sites, indexed dumps) | hunt-engine.js dork | surface+ | | 4 | Breach forums (BreachForums, Exploit.in) | hunt-engine.js forum + manual | deep+ | | 5 | Telegram leak channels | Manual channel search | deep+ | | 6 | Dark web markets (.onion) | Tor Browser, manual | dark+ | | 7 | Stealer log markets (Russian Market, Genesis) | Tor Browser, manual | dark+ |

Breach Search APIs

h8mail (aggregated breach search):

h8mail -t target@corp.com -q domain --all
h8mail -t corp.com -q domain --all -o dumps/h8mail-corp.csv

Searches HIBP, LeakCheck, Snusbase, and other APIs. Configure API keys in ~/.h8mail/h8mail_config.ini.

Intelligence X (full-text breach search):

# Via API
curl -s "https://2.intelx.io/intelligent/search" \
  -H "x-key: $INTELX_API_KEY" \
  -d '{"term":"corp.com","maxresults":100,"media":0,"sort":2,"terminate":[]}'

Have I Been Pwned (breach membership check):

# Check single email
curl -s "https://haveibeenpwned.com/api/v3/breachedaccount/user@corp.com" \
  -H "hibp-api-key: $HIBP_API_KEY" \
  -H "user-agent: tyrell-hunter"

Returns list of breaches the email appears in — use to identify which breach databases to hunt for.

Query Generation

node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/hunt-engine.js dork <target> --category leaks
node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/hunt-engine.js github <target> --type secrets
node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/hunt-engine.js forum <target>

Execute generated queries via MCP tools (Brave Search, Shodan MCP, GitHub search). Do not manually construct queries — the engine optimizes them per source type.

GitHub Secret Hunting

Beyond hunt-engine.js, use dedicated tools for deeper coverage:

# gitleaks — scan a cloned repo
gitleaks detect --source /path/to/cloned-repo --report-format json --report-path dumps/gitleaks-report.json

# trufflehog — scan GitHub org
trufflehog github --org=target-org --json > dumps/trufflehog-results.jsonl

Look for: database connection strings (mongodb://, redis://, mysql://, postgres://, JDBC URLs), API keys, AWS credentials, .env files, config.yml with plaintext passwords.

Phase 3: Validation

Every result must be validated before acquisition. This prevents wasting time and storage on fake, synthetic, or irrelevant data.

Quick Validation Checklist

  1. Domain match: Do email addresses in the sample match the target's known domains?
  2. Format plausibility: Realistic data distributions — mixed names, varied passwords, correct phone/CPF formats
  3. Volume consistency: Claimed record count plausible for the target's size (a 50-person startup won't have 10M records)
  4. Date plausibility: Breach date consistent with company history and known breach events
  5. Cross-reference: Check if this data appears in known public breaches (may be recycled old data)

Red Flags (Fake / Scam Data)

| Signal | Meaning | |--------|---------| | Sequential IDs (1,2,3,4...) with no gaps | Likely generated, not real data | | All records share the same password hash | Test/seed data | | Seller has <10 forum posts, claims exclusive fresh data | Probable scam | | Preview shows only 3-5 records for a "multi-million" dump | Insufficient proof | | Email domains don't match target at all | Wrong target or fabricated | | All passwords are plaintext and suspiciously simple | May be a combo list, not a real breach | | Offered "free" on a known scam channel | Bait for malware or phishing |

Stealer Log Validation

Stealer logs (from Redline, Raccoon, Vidar, etc.) require extra validation:

  • URL field: Should contain target's login URL (e.g., https://portal.corp.com/login)
  • Timestamp: Recent timestamps (< 6 months) indicate active infection
  • Machine info: Hostname, OS, installed software — confirms real infected endpoint
  • Cookie data: Session cookies may still be valid for account takeover

Phase 4: Source Logging and Classification

Every discovered source gets logged immediately upon discovery — before full validation. Classification happens after validation.

Log the Source

node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/source-tracker.js add <type> <url-or-identifier> "<description>" \
  --data-types email,password,name \
  --records <estimated-count>

Source types: forum, paste, darkweb, telegram, github, api-result, stealer-log

Classify After Validation

node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/source-tracker.js classify <id> \
  --credibility <high|medium|low|unknown> \
  --freshness <YYYY-MM> \
  --access-method <open|login|purchase|exploit>

Credibility Decision Tree

Sample validated against known real accounts?
  YES → credibility: high
  NO  → Seller has 50+ posts and forum vouches?
          YES → credibility: medium
          NO  → Sample format plausible and domain matches?
                  YES → credibility: low
                  NO  → credibility: unknown (or scam → mark dead)

Phase 5: Triage and Route

After logging and classifying, route each source to the appropriate next step.

| Access Status | Credibility | Route | Action | |--------------|-------------|-------|--------| | Open (direct download) | High/Medium | data-acquisition skill | Download, convert, register in acquisition tracker | | Open (direct download) | Low/Unknown | Validate first | Pull sample, re-assess before full acquisition | | Login required (foru

Compartilhar X LinkedIn