Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

linear-programming-solver

Habilidade de programação linear para alocação de recursos, agendamento e problemas de otimização.

1.4kestrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add a5c-ai/babysitter

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/linear-programming-solver/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/linear-programming-solver)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Automação →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Automação toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Automação. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Linear Programming Solver

Overview

The Linear Programming Solver skill provides comprehensive capabilities for formulating and solving linear optimization problems. It supports resource allocation, production planning, scheduling, and other business optimization challenges through efficient solver integration and solution analysis.

Capabilities

  • LP model formulation assistance
  • Solver integration (GLPK, CBC, CPLEX, Gurobi)
  • Sensitivity analysis (shadow prices, reduced costs)
  • Infeasibility diagnosis
  • Unboundedness detection
  • Integer programming support
  • Multi-objective LP (goal programming)
  • Solution interpretation

Used By Processes

  • Prescriptive Analytics and Optimization
  • Resource Allocation
  • Supply Chain Optimization

Usage

Problem Formulation

# Define LP problem
lp_problem = {
    "name": "Production Planning",
    "sense": "maximize",  # or "minimize"
    "decision_variables": {
        "product_A": {"type": "continuous", "lower_bound": 0, "upper_bound": 1000},
        "product_B": {"type": "continuous", "lower_bound": 0, "upper_bound": 800},
        "product_C": {"type": "integer", "lower_bound": 0}  # integer variable
    },
    "objective": {
        "expression": "50*product_A + 40*product_B + 60*product_C",
        "description": "Maximize total profit"
    },
    "constraints": [
        {
            "name": "labor_hours",
            "expression": "2*product_A + 3*product_B + 4*product_C <= 2400",
            "description": "Total labor hours available"
        },
        {
            "name": "machine_time",
            "expression": "3*product_A + 2*product_B + 3*product_C <= 2000",
            "description": "Machine time capacity"
        },
        {
            "name": "raw_material",
            "expression": "product_A + product_B + product_C <= 1200",
            "description": "Raw material availability"
        },
        {
            "name": "demand_A",
            "expression": "product_A >= 100",
            "description": "Minimum demand for product A"
        }
    ]
}

Solver Configuration

# Solver settings
solver_config = {
    "solver": "CBC",  # or "GLPK", "CPLEX", "GUROBI"
    "time_limit": 300,  # seconds
    "mip_gap": 0.01,  # 1% optimality gap for MIP
    "threads": 4,
    "presolve": True,
    "cuts": "automatic"
}

Sensitivity Analysis

# Request sensitivity information
sensitivity_config = {
    "shadow_prices": True,
    "reduced_costs": True,
    "allowable_ranges": True,
    "what_if": [
        {"constraint": "labor_hours", "change": 100},
        {"objective_coeff": "product_A", "change": 5}
    ]
}

Common LP Problem Types

| Problem Type | Objective | Key Constraints | |-------------|-----------|-----------------| | Production Planning | Maximize profit | Capacity, demand | | Transportation | Minimize cost | Supply, demand | | Assignment | Minimize cost/time | One-to-one matching | | Blending | Minimize cost | Quality specs, availability | | Network Flow | Min cost/max flow | Flow balance, capacity | | Portfolio | Maximize return | Risk, budget, diversification |

Input Schema

{
  "problem_definition": {
    "name": "string",
    "sense": "maximize|minimize",
    "decision_variables": "object",
    "objective": {
      "expression": "string",
      "description": "string"
    },
    "constraints": ["object"]
  },
  "solver_config": {
    "solver": "string",
    "time_limit": "number",
    "mip_gap": "number"
  },
  "analysis_options": {
    "sensitivity": "boolean",
    "what_if": ["object"],
    "report_format": "string"
  }
}

Output Schema

{
  "status": "Optimal|Infeasible|Unbounded|TimeLimit",
  "objective_value": "number",
  "solution": {
    "variable_name": "number"
  },
  "sensitivity": {
    "shadow_prices": {
      "constraint_name": {
        "value": "number",
        "allowable_increase": "number",
        "allowable_decrease": "number"
      }
    },
    "reduced_costs": {
      "variable_name": {
        "value": "number",
        "allowable_increase": "number",
        "allowable_decrease": "number"
      }
    }
  },
  "infeasibility_analysis": {
    "conflicting_constraints": ["string"],
    "suggested_relaxations": ["object"]
  },
  "what_if_results": ["object"],
  "solve_time": "number"
}

Sensitivity Interpretation

| Metric | Meaning | Use | |--------|---------|-----| | Shadow Price | Value of relaxing constraint by 1 unit | Prioritize constraint relief | | Reduced Cost | Cost of forcing non-basic variable into solution | Evaluate non-optimal alternatives | | Allowable Range | Range where basis stays optimal | Assess stability of solution |

Best Practices

  1. Verify model formulation with simple test cases
  2. Check units consistency in coefficients
  3. Analyze infeasibility before debugging manually
  4. Use shadow prices to guide resource acquisition
  5. Consider integer programming only when necessary (harder to solve)
  6. Validate solution against business constraints
  7. Document model assumptions clearly

Infeasibility Handling

When model is infeasible:

  1. Identify Irreducible Infeasible Subset (IIS)
  2. Relax constraints using elastic variables
  3. Prioritize constraint satisfaction
  4. Use goal programming for conflicting objectives

Integration Points

  • Feeds into Optimization Specialist agent
  • Connects with Sensitivity Analyzer for robustness
  • Supports Constraint Satisfaction Solver for hybrid problems
  • Integrates with Decision Visualization for solution display
Compartilhar X LinkedIn