Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

liveview-code-review

Reviews Phoenix LiveView code for lifecycle patterns, assigns/streams usage, components, and security. Use when reviewing LiveView modules, .heex templates, or LiveComponents.

65estrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: Apache-2.0

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add existential-birds/beagle

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/liveview-code-review/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/liveview-code-review)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Desenvolvimento →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Desenvolvimento toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Desenvolvimento. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

LiveView Code Review

Quick Reference

| Issue Type | Reference | |------------|-----------| | mount, handle_params, handle_event, handle_async | [references/lifecycle.md](references/lifecycle.md) | | When to use assigns vs streams, AsyncResult | [references/assigns-streams.md](references/assigns-streams.md) | | Function vs LiveComponent, slots, attrs | [references/components.md](references/components.md) | | Authorization per event, phx-value trust | [references/security.md](references/security.md) |

Review Checklist

Critical Issues

  • [ ] No socket copying into async functions (extract values first)
  • [ ] Every handle_event validates authorization
  • [ ] No sensitive data in assigns (visible in DOM)
  • [ ] phx-value data is validated (user-modifiable)

Lifecycle

  • [ ] Subscriptions wrapped in connected?(socket)
  • [ ] handle_params used for URL-based state
  • [ ] handle_async handles :loading and :error states

Data Management

  • [ ] Streams used for large collections (100+ items)
  • [ ] temporary_assigns for data not needed after render
  • [ ] AsyncResult patterns for loading states

Components

  • [ ] Function components preferred over LiveComponents
  • [ ] LiveComponents preserve :inner_block in update/2
  • [ ] Slots use proper attr declarations
  • [ ] phx-debounce on text inputs

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

  • Empty mount returning {:ok, socket} - Valid for simple LiveViews
  • Using assigns for small lists - Streams only needed for 100+ items
  • LiveComponent without update/2 - Default update/2 assigns all
  • phx-click without phx-value - Event may not need data
  • Inline function in heex - Valid for simple transforms

Context-Sensitive Rules

| Issue | Flag ONLY IF | |-------|--------------| | Missing debounce | Input is text/textarea AND triggers server event | | Use streams | Collection has 100+ items OR is paginated | | Missing auth check | Event modifies data AND no auth in mount |

Critical Anti-Patterns

Socket Copying (MOST IMPORTANT)

# BAD - socket copied into async function
def handle_event("load", _, socket) do
  Task.async(fn ->
    user = socket.assigns.user  # Socket copied!
    fetch_data(user.id)
  end)
  {:noreply, socket}
end

# GOOD - extract values first
def handle_event("load", _, socket) do
  user_id = socket.assigns.user.id
  Task.async(fn ->
    fetch_data(user_id)  # Only primitive copied
  end)
  {:noreply, socket}
end

Missing Authorization

# BAD - trusts phx-value without auth
def handle_event("delete", %{"id" => id}, socket) do
  Posts.delete_post!(id)  # Anyone can delete any post!
  {:noreply, socket}
end

# GOOD - verify authorization
def handle_event("delete", %{"id" => id}, socket) do
  post = Posts.get_post!(id)

  if post.user_id == socket.assigns.current_user.id do
    Posts.delete_post!(post)
    {:noreply, stream_delete(socket, :posts, post)}
  else
    {:noreply, put_flash(socket, :error, "Unauthorized")}
  end
end

Hard gates (sequence)

Advance only when each pass condition is objectively true (prevents reporting without evidence):

| Gate | Pass condition | |------|----------------| | G1 — Files in evidence | You have an explicit list of paths under review (e.g. .ex, .heex, or the paths the user named). Every finding names a file from that list. | | G2 — Verification protocol | You loaded [review-verification-protocol](../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md) and applied its Pre-Report Verification (and issue-type sections where relevant) before treating something as a finding. | | G3 — Line anchors | Each finding uses [FILE:LINE] where that line exists in the current file (confirmed by read/grep output, not inferred). | | G4 — Valid-pattern screen | You checked the finding against Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag) and Context-Sensitive Rules; if it matches a “do not flag” case or fails a “Flag ONLY IF,” you do not report it. |

Issue format

Use [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE for each finding.

Compartilhar X LinkedIn