Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

ln-634-test-coverage-auditor

Identifies missing tests for unique critical local logic: money, auth, permissions, data integrity, algorithms, and domain rules. Use when auditing critical logic coverage gaps.

497estrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/ln-634-test-coverage-auditor/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/ln-634-test-coverage-auditor)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Desenvolvimento →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Desenvolvimento toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Desenvolvimento. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa
Paths: File paths (references/, ../ln-*) are relative to this skill directory.

Critical Logic Coverage Auditor (L3 Worker)

Type: L3 Worker

Specialized worker identifying missing tests for unique critical local logic.

Purpose & Scope

  • Audit Critical Logic Coverage (Category 4: High Priority)
  • Identify untested unique local logic only
  • Classify by category (Money, Auth/Permissions, Data Integrity, Algorithms, Domain Rules)
  • Emit ADD_MISSING findings for missing high-value tests
  • Do not recommend tests just to increase coverage percentage
  • Calculate compliance score (X/10)

Inputs

MANDATORY READ: Load references/audit_worker_core_contract.md. Tool policy: follow host AGENTS.md MCP preferences; load references/mcp_tool_preferences.md and references/mcp_integration_patterns.md only when host policy is absent or MCP behavior is unclear.

Receives contextStore with: tech_stack, testFilesMetadata, codebase_root, output_dir.

Domain-aware: Supports domain_mode + current_domain (see audit_output_schema.md#domain-aware-worker-output).

Use hex-graph first when hotspots materially improve coverage-gap discovery. Use hex-line first for local code and test reads when available. If MCP is unavailable, unsupported, or not indexed, continue with built-in Read/Grep/Glob/Bash and state the fallback in the report.

Workflow

Detection policy: use two-layer detection (candidate scan, then context verification); load references/two_layer_detection.md only when the verification method is ambiguous.

1) Parse context -- extract fields, determine scan_path (domain-aware if specified) ELSE: scan_path = codebase_root domain_name = null ```

2) Identify critical local logic in scan_path (not entire codebase)

  • Scan production code in scan_path for money/auth/permission/data/algorithm/domain-rule keywords
  • All Grep/Glob patterns use scan_path (not codebase_root)
  • Example: Grep(pattern="payment|refund|discount", path=scan_path)

3) Check test coverage for each critical path (Layer 1)

  • Search ALL test files for coverage (tests may be in different location than production code)
  • Match by function name, module name, or test description

3b) Context Analysis (Layer 2 -- MANDATORY): For each gap candidate, ask:

  • Is this function already covered by E2E/integration test? -> downgrade to LOW
  • Is this a helper function with <10 lines called from tested code? -> skip
  • Is keyword match a false positive (e.g., paymentIcon() is UI, not payment logic)? -> skip

4) Collect missing tests

  • Tag each finding with domain: domain_name (if domain-aware)
  • Set action: "ADD_MISSING" for every confirmed finding

5) Calculate Score: Count violations by severity, calculate compliance score (X/10)

6) Write Report: Build full markdown report in memory per references/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md, write to {output_dir}/ln-634--{identifier}.md (or {output_dir}/ln-634--{identifier}.md if domain-aware) in single Write call

7) Return Summary: Return minimal summary to coordinator (see Output Format)

Critical Local Logic Classification

1. Money Flows (Priority 20+)

What: Any code handling financial transactions

Examples:

  • Payment processing (/payment, processPayment())
  • Discounts/promotions (calculateDiscount(), applyPromoCode())
  • Tax calculations (calculateTax(), getTaxRate())
  • Refunds (processRefund(), /refund)
  • Invoices/billing (generateInvoice(), createBill())
  • Currency conversion (convertCurrency())

Min Priority: 20

Why Critical: Money loss, fraud, legal compliance

2. Auth & Permissions (Priority 20+)

What: Local authentication, authorization, permission, and security decisions

Examples:

  • Login/logout (/login, authenticate())
  • Token refresh (/refresh-token, refreshAccessToken())
  • Password reset (/forgot-password, resetPassword())
  • Permissions/RBAC (checkPermission(), hasRole())
  • Encryption/hashing (custom crypto orchestration or policy, NOT library behavior such as bcrypt/argon2)
  • API key validation (validateApiKey())

Min Priority: 20

Why Critical: Security breach, data leak, unauthorized access

3. Data Integrity (Priority 15+)

What: CRUD operations, transactions, validation

Examples:

  • Critical CRUD (createUser(), deleteOrder(), updateProduct())
  • Database transactions (withTransaction())
  • Data validation (custom validators, NOT framework defaults)
  • Data migrations (runMigration())
  • Unique constraints (checkDuplicateEmail())

Min Priority: 15

Why Critical: Data corruption, lost data, inconsistent state

4. Algorithms & Domain Rules (Priority 15+)

What: Local calculations, branching rules, state transitions, and algorithms that encode project-specific behavior

Examples:

  • Ranking/scoring algorithms
  • Eligibility rules
  • Domain state transitions
  • Custom validation rules beyond framework defaults
  • Import/export transformations

Min Priority: 15

Why Critical: Wrong product behavior, bad decisions, corrupted business state

Audit Rules

1. Identify Critical Local Logic

Process:

  • Scan codebase for money-related keywords: payment, refund, discount, tax, price, currency
  • Scan for auth/permission keywords: auth, login, password, token, permission, role, policy
  • Scan for data keywords: transaction, validation, migration, constraint
  • Scan for algorithms/domain rules: score, rank, eligibility, state, workflow, rule
  • Exclude framework defaults, generated behavior, and library primitives; ln-631 owns product-vs-platform test focus for existing tests

2. Check Test Coverage

For each critical path:

  • Search test files for matching test name/description
  • If NO test found -> add to missing tests list
  • If test found but inadequate (only positive, no edge cases) -> add to gaps list

3. Categorize Gaps

Severity by Priority:

  • CRITICAL: Priority 20+ (Money, Security)
  • HIGH: Priority 15-19 (Data, Core Flows)
  • MEDIUM: Priority 10-14 (Important but not critical)
  • Downgrade when: Function already covered by E2E test -> LOW. Helper with <10 lines called from tested code -> skip

4. Provide Justification

For each missing test:

  • Explain WHY it's critical (money loss, security breach, etc.)
  • Suggest test type (E2E, Integration, Unit)
  • Set action to ADD_MISSING
  • Estimate effort (S/M/L)

Scoring Algorithm

MANDATORY READ: Load references/audit_scoring.md.

Severity mapping by Priority:

  • Priority 20+ (Money, Security) missing test -> CRITICAL
  • Priority 15-19 (Data Integrity, Core Flows) missing test -> HIGH
  • Priority 10-14 (Important) missing test -> MEDIUM
  • Priority <10 (Nice-to-have) -> LOW

Output Format

MANDATORY READ: Load references/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.

Write JSON summary per references/audit_summary_contract.md. In managed mode the caller passes both runId and summaryArtifactPath; in standalone mode the worker generates its own run-scoped artifact path per shared contract.

Write report to {output_dir}/ln-634--{identifier}.md (global) or {output_dir}/ln-634--{identifier}.md (domain-aware) with category: "Critical Logic Coverage" and checks: money_logic_coverage, auth_permission_coverage, data_integrity_coverage, algorithm_domain_rule_coverage.

Return summary per references/audit_summary_contract.md.

When summaryArtifactPath is absent, write the standalone runtime summary under .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/evaluation-worker/{worker}--{identifier}.json and optionally echo the same summary in structured output.

Report written: .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report/ln-634--{identifier}.md
Score: X.X/10 | Issues: N (C:N H:N M:N L:N
Compartilhar X LinkedIn