Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

multi-location-seo

Multi-location SEO strategy and audit. Activates when the business has multiple physical locations, franchise locations, or serves distinctly different geographic areas. Covers GBP management, location page architecture, citation strategy, and content differentiation per location. Phase 21. Output: {AUDIT_DIR}/multi-location-findings.md

19estrelas
Atualizado há 7 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add mshahiddigital/agentic-local-seo-audit

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/multi-location-seo/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/multi-location-seo)

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Escrita e Conteúdo toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Escrita e Conteúdo. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Multi-Location SEO Audit — Phase 21

Executive Summary

Multi-location SEO is exponentially more complex than single-location — each additional location adds citation management, content differentiation, schema isolation, and cannibalization risk. In 2025, proximity weight for mobile local search increased to ~35% of local pack ranking (up from ~25% in 2023), meaning geographic optimization at each location matters more than ever. AI Overviews appear for ~35% of local service queries (Q1 2025) and pull directly from GBP data + location landing pages. Businesses with template-cloned location pages face active suppression under Google's Helpful Content System (integrated into core algorithm March 2024). The 60% unique content threshold is now a hard floor — below it = Helpful Content System penalty risk.

2025 multi-location benchmarks per location: | Metric | Minimum Viable | Competitive | Market Leader | |--------|---------------|------------|---------------| | GBP review count | 25 reviews | 75–100 | 200+ | | GBP review rating | 4.0 stars | 4.5 stars | 4.7–5.0 stars | | Review velocity | 2/month | 5–8/month | 15+/month | | GBP photos | 10 photos | 25+ photos | 50+ photos | | Location page word count | 600 words | 1,000–1,500 words | 2,000+ words | | Unique content vs. other pages | 60% | 80%+ | 90%+ | | Citations per location | 40 | 75–100 | 150+ | | NAP consistency | 85% | 95% | 99–100% |

Numbered Action Plan:

Immediate (Week 1, Per-Location Wins)

  1. Run NAP consistency audit — BrightLocal or Whitespark → check all active citations for each location → identify and flag inconsistencies (wrong address, old phone, variant business names). Effort: 30 min/location. Priority: 25 (5×5).
  2. Verify all GBPs are claimed and verified — each location must have its own GBP with verified address. Unclaimed GBP = competitor can claim it. Effort: 30 min/location.
  3. Audit location page unique content — Screaming Frog → compare content similarity across location pages. Any page <60% unique vs. template = HCS penalty risk. Flag for immediate rewrite. Effort: 1 hr.
  4. Check schema isolation — each location page must have its own LocalBusiness schema with unique @id, address, telephone, geo. Check with Google Rich Results Test. Effort: 15 min/location.
  5. Check GBP 2025 features per location — verify Q&A seeded with keywords, service menu complete, review velocity ≥2/month, photos ≥25. Effort: 20 min/location.

Short-Term (Week 2–4)

  1. Fix duplicate SAP (Service Area Pages) — any location page ranking for the same keyword in the same city = cannibalization. Implement canonical to strongest page or differentiate content significantly. Effort: 1–2 hrs.
  2. Add AI search optimization per location — each location page needs: FAQPage schema (5 FAQ min, local questions), LocalBusiness + areaServed schema, local review AggregateRating, GBP Q&A with service + location keywords. AIO appears for ~35% of local queries. Effort: 1 hr/location.
  3. Implement parentOrganization schema — each location page's LocalBusiness schema must include parentOrganization pointing to the main brand's Organization schema. This is the correct replacement for deprecated branchOf. Effort: 30 min dev.
  4. Build or optimize location landing pages — each location needs: 1,000+ words unique content, local photos (not stock), local testimonials, local team/staff mention, local landmarks/context. Target Surfer Score ≥70. Effort: 4–6 hrs/location.
  5. Set up BrightLocal Grid Tracker per location — track each location's GBP rank across 5×5 geogrid to identify proximity score gaps within the service area. Effort: 30 min setup/location. Expected: identifies which zones need additional GBP optimization.

Applicability Check

This phase applies when the business has:

  • 2+ physical addresses serving different markets
  • Franchise or franchise-like multi-location model
  • Service-area businesses covering 3+ distinct cities
  • Plans to expand to additional locations

If single-location only: note N/A, skip this phase, award 100/100 by default.

Step 1: Read Project Context

Read {AUDIT_DIR}/intake-data.md — confirm number of locations, business name, URL. Read {AUDIT_DIR}/local-findings.md — single-location GBP/review baseline. Read {AUDIT_DIR}/technical-findings.md — URL architecture and schema status. Read {AUDIT_DIR}/competitor-profiles.md — competitor multi-location footprint.

Tools for this phase: | Tool | Purpose | Cost | |------|---------|------| | BrightLocal | Multi-location citation management, NAP audits, GBP tracking (1–100 locations) | Paid | | Yext | Centralized listing management at scale (50+ locations), real-time sync | Paid | | Whitespark | Citation building per location, Local Rank Tracker grid view | Paid | | Local Falcon | Geographic rank grid — visualize pack position across a city for each location | Paid | | Data Axle | Primary aggregator submission — feeds 100s of directories per location | Paid | | PlePer Tools | Free competitor GBP data extraction — category, attributes, photo counts | Free | | Google Business Profile API | Manage 10+ locations programmatically (replaces deprecated My Business API v4.1) | Free | | Screaming Frog | Crawl location pages for duplicate content, schema, internal link issues | Paid/Free |

2025 Multi-Location Context: AIO (AI Overviews) appears for ~35% of local service queries as of Q1 2025, and proximity weight for mobile search increased to ~35% of the local pack algorithm. Businesses with complete, verified GBP listings at each location and strong unique content per location page are best positioned for AIO inclusion.

Step 2: GBP Per-Location Audit

For EACH location, verify using PlePer or direct GBP Manager export:

| Check | Location 1 | Location 2 | Location 3 | |-------|-----------|-----------|-----------| | Separate GBP listing exists | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | | Listing claimed & verified | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | | Verified via: Postcard/Video/Email | | | | | Unique primary category set | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | | Correct unique address | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | | Unique local phone number (not shared 1800) | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | | Links to location-specific page (not homepage) | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | | 100+ photos for location | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | | Weekly GBP posts (location-specific content) | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | | 20+ reviews with ≥4.3 rating | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | | Q&A seeded (5+ owner answers) | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | | Services/products listed | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ |

Photo impact: Locations with 100+ photos receive 1,065% more website clicks vs. locations with fewer photos (Google internal data, 2024). Prioritize photo upload to all locations.

GBP Bulk Verification (10+ locations): Use accounts.locations.list endpoint via the current GBP API (v1). The legacy My Business API v4.1 is deprecated — use mybusinessaccountmanagement.googleapis.com instead.

Critical: Each GBP must link to its own dedicated location page — not the homepage. GBP Chat was deprecated July 2024 — remove any references.

Step 3: Location Page Architecture

URL Structure Assessment (Ranked by SEO Preference)

| Pattern | SEO Preference | When to Use | |---------|--------------|-------------| | domain.com/locations/chicago-il/ | ✅ Best — inherits root domain authority | Single brand, 2–50 locations | | domain.com/chicago-plumbing/ | ✅ Good — service + location in URL | Service-dominant businesses | | domain.com/locations/chicago-il/drain-cleaning/ | ✅ Best for deep service pages | Service × location matrix | | chicago.domain.com/ | ⚠️ Acceptable — use for franchise with distinct branding | Large franchise (50+ distinct brands) | | domain.com/?location=chicago | ❌ Avoid — parameter-based, crawl issues | Never | | domain.com/location.php?id=3 | ❌ Avoid — no location signal in URL | Never |

2025 recommendation: Subdirector

Compartilhar X LinkedIn