Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

nw-source-verification

Source reputation tiers, cross-referencing methodology, bias detection, and citation format requirements

556estrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add nWave-ai/nWave

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/nw-source-verification-nwave-ai/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/nw-source-verification-nwave-ai)
#ai

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Design e Frontend toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Design e Frontend. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Source Verification

Source Reputation Tiers

Validate every source against the trusted source domains provided via prompt context.

| Tier | Score | Examples | Verification | |------|-------|---------|-------------| | High | 1.0 | Academic (.edu, arxiv.org, ieee.org), Official (.gov, w3.org, ietf.org), Tech docs (developer.mozilla.org), OSS foundations (apache.org, cncf.io) | Standard citation | | Medium-High | 0.8 | Industry leaders (martinfowler.com, stackoverflow.com, infoq.com) | Cross-ref with 1+ high-tier | | Medium | 0.6 | Community (medium.com verified experts, dev.to, hashnode.com) | Author verification + 3-source cross-ref | | Excluded | 0.0 | Unverified blogs (*.blogspot.com, wordpress.com), quora.com, pastebin.com | Reject, log warning, find alternative |

Cross-Referencing Methodology

  1. Identify the specific assertion to verify
  2. Find 2+ independent sources not citing each other (avoid circular refs)
  3. Verify independence: different authors, publishers, organizations
  4. Compare: agree on substance (minor wording differences OK)
  5. Document: verified / partially verified / unverified per finding

Circular Reference Detection

  • Source B cites Source A = one source, not two
  • Multiple sources referencing single study = cite the original
  • Prefer primary over secondary sources

Bias Detection Checklist

Evaluate before citing:

  1. Commercial interest: selling related product/service?
  2. Sponsorship: sponsored/funded content?
  3. Conflict of interest: author benefits from conclusion?
  4. Geographic/cultural bias: limited to single region?
  5. Temporal bias: publication dates skewed to specific era?
  6. Cherry-picking: contradictory evidence acknowledged?
  7. Logical fallacies: correlation as causation, authority without evidence

When bias detected: note in Source Analysis, reduce confidence.

Citation Format

[1] {Author/Organization}. "{Title}". {Publication/Website}. {Date}. {Full URL}. Accessed {YYYY-MM-DD}.

Required Metadata Per Source

Source URL | Domain | Access date | Reputation score (from tiers) | Verification status

Paywalled or Restricted Sources

Mark "[Paywalled]"/"[Restricted Access]" | Provide URL | Find open-access alternative | Note in Knowledge Gaps

Compartilhar X LinkedIn