Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

prioritize

Classify PM tasks using LNO Framework (Leverage/Neutral/Overhead) to focus on high-impact work.

18estrelas
Atualizado há 3 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add coalesce-labs/catalyst

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/prioritize-coalesce-labs/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/prioritize-coalesce-labs)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Pesquisa e Web →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Pesquisa e Web toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Pesquisa e Web. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Task Prioritization: LNO Framework

When to use: When overwhelmed with tasks, during weekly planning, or when feeling busy but not productive

Framework source: Shreyas Doshi's LNO Framework (popularized by Aakash Gupta)

Quick Start

  1. Paste your task list (calendar, to-do list, or just describe your week)
  2. I will classify each task as L (Leverage/10x), N (Neutral/1x), or O (Overhead/<1x)
  3. I will calculate your L/N/O time distribution and compare to the healthy target (40/35/20)
  4. I will suggest specific tasks to eliminate, delegate, or timebox
  5. Output: a prioritized weekly plan with calendar blocking recommendations

Healthy target: 40-50% Leverage, 30-40% Neutral, 10-20% Overhead. If Leverage is below 30%, something is wrong.

The LNO Framework

Classify every task into one of three categories:

L = Leverage Tasks (10x your impact)

Definition: Activities that disproportionately increase your impact

Characteristics:

  • High effort, HIGH impact
  • Compound over time
  • Often urgent AND important
  • Create lasting value

Examples:

  • Writing a PRD that aligns 5 teams
  • Building a dashboard that automates reporting
  • Creating a decision framework teams can reuse
  • Designing an onboarding flow that improves activation
  • Strategic 1:1s with key stakeholders
  • User research that uncovers major insights

Impact: 10x

N = Neutral Tasks (Regular impact)

Definition: Necessary work with linear impact

Characteristics:

  • Regular effort, regular impact
  • Doesn't compound
  • Often important but not urgent
  • Maintenance work

Examples:

  • Routine status updates
  • Standard sprint planning
  • Responding to most emails
  • Attending most meetings
  • Bug triage (non-critical)
  • Backlog grooming
  • Documentation (routine)

Impact: 1x

The key insight: Aim for C+/B- on Neutral tasks

  • Don't overinvest
  • Good enough is fine
  • Preserve energy for Leverage tasks

O = Overhead Tasks (Minimal impact)

Definition: Activities with very little impact relative to time spent

Characteristics:

  • High effort, LOW impact
  • Feels urgent but isn't important
  • Often reactive
  • Creates no lasting value

Examples:

  • Most Slack threads (especially drama/politics)
  • Meetings you're CC'd on "just in case"
  • Over-polishing decks for internal reviews
  • Formatting documents obsessively
  • Responding to every FYI email
  • Bikeshedding in design reviews
  • Arguing over naming conventions
  • Attending meetings where you have no input

Impact: Near zero

Goal: Minimize, delegate, automate, or eliminate

How to Use This Framework

Step 1: Audit Your Current Week

List everything you did last week:

Use /prioritize

Here's everything I did last week:
[paste your calendar/task list]

Help me classify each task as L, N, or O.
Then calculate:
- % time spent on Leverage tasks
- % time spent on Neutral tasks
- % time spent on Overhead tasks

Healthy distribution for senior PMs:

  • Leverage: 40-50%
  • Neutral: 30-40%
  • Overhead: 10-20%

If you're below 30% Leverage, something's wrong.

Step 2: Classify Tasks Before Doing Them

Before you work on something, ask:

Is this Leverage?

  • Will this create disproportionate impact?
  • Will this compound over time?
  • If yes → Do it yourself, invest deeply

Is this Neutral?

  • Is this necessary but not game-changing?
  • Can I do "good enough" instead of perfect?
  • If yes → Timebox it, aim for B- quality

Is this Overhead?

  • Could I not do this and nothing bad happens?
  • Am I doing this out of obligation, not impact?
  • If yes → Delegate, automate, or skip

Step 3: Protect Your Leverage Time

Block calendar time for Leverage work:

  • Monday morning: 3-hour strategy block
  • Wednesday afternoon: 2-hour deep work
  • Friday morning: 2-hour planning/thinking time

Treat it like a meeting:

  • Decline conflicting invitations
  • Turn off Slack
  • Close email

Specific Tactics by Category

Tactics for Leverage Tasks:

1. Do them FIRST

  • Morning energy > afternoon energy
  • Don't wait until "everything else is done"

2. Invest disproportionately

  • Spend 8 hours on a 10x task
  • Don't spend 1 hour on 8 different 1x tasks

3. Seek multipliers

  • Build frameworks others can reuse
  • Create templates that scale
  • Automate repetitive decisions

4. Example weekly planning:

Monday AM: Write high-impact PRD (Leverage)
Monday PM: Routine meetings (Neutral)
Tuesday AM: User research synthesis (Leverage)
Tuesday PM: Sprint planning (Neutral)
Wednesday AM: Strategic 1:1s with stakeholders (Leverage)
Wednesday PM: Bug triage (Neutral)
Thursday AM: Build metrics dashboard (Leverage)
Thursday PM: Status updates (Neutral)
Friday AM: Reflect & plan next week (Leverage)
Friday PM: Clear Slack backlog (Overhead - timeboxed)

Tactics for Neutral Tasks:

1. Timebox ruthlessly

  • Sprint planning: 60 minutes MAX
  • Status updates: 30 minutes
  • Email: 2x/day for 20 minutes each

2. Use templates

  • Status update template
  • Meeting notes template
  • Decision log template
  • Don't reinvent each time

3. Batch similar tasks

  • All status updates on Friday
  • All 1:1s on Tuesday/Thursday
  • All email at 9am and 3pm

4. Aim for B- quality

  • Status update doesn't need perfect prose
  • Meeting notes don't need perfect formatting
  • Backlog grooming doesn't need perfect prioritization

The mantra: "Good enough is great for Neutral tasks"

Tactics for Overhead Tasks:

1. Eliminate

  • Decline meetings where you're optional
  • Unsubscribe from FYI email threads
  • Leave Slack channels you don't contribute to

2. Delegate

  • Can an APM or intern handle this?
  • Can engineering lead own this decision?
  • Can designer lead the review?

3. Automate

  • Set up Slack status: "Focus time 9-12, async responses only"
  • Create email filters and auto-responses
  • Build dashboards instead of manual reports

4. Say no

  • "I don't think I can add value to this meeting"
  • "Can you send me the notes instead?"
  • "Let's async this in a doc rather than meet"

Example overhead elimination:

  • 10 meetings/week → 6 meetings (saved 4 hours)
  • 2 hours Slack → 30 min (saved 1.5 hours)
  • 1 hour manual reporting → automated (saved 1 hour)
  • Total reclaimed: 6.5 hours/week for Leverage work

Weekly Planning Template

Use this every Sunday or Friday:

1. Leverage Tasks This Week (Aim for 3-5)

  • [ ] Task 1: ___________ (Time: ____ hours)
  • [ ] Task 2: ___________ (Time: ____ hours)
  • [ ] Task 3: ___________ (Time: ____ hours)

Total Leverage hours: _____ / 40 hours (Target: 40%+)

2. Neutral Tasks (Necessary)

  • [ ] Task 1: ___________ (Timeboxed: ____ min)
  • [ ] Task 2: ___________ (Timeboxed: ____ min)
  • [ ] Task 3: ___________ (Timeboxed: ____ min)

3. Overhead to Eliminate/Delegate

  • ~~Task 1~~ → Declined/delegated to _____
  • ~~Task 2~~ → Automated with _____
  • ~~Task 3~~ → Skipping (no impact)

4. Calendar Blocks

  • [ ] Monday 9-12: Leverage block (no meetings)
  • [ ] Wednesday 2-4: Leverage block (no meetings)
  • [ ] Friday 9-11: Reflect & plan

Real-World Examples

Example 1: Writing a PRD

Leverage approach:

  • Spend 8 hours writing a comprehensive PRD
  • Get input from engineering, design, data
  • Create clear alignment across 5 teams
  • Result: Smooth execution, no mid-sprint confusion
  • ROI: 10x (saves 80 hours of misalignment downstream)

Neutral approach:

  • Spend 2 hours on quick spec
  • Just enough to start building
  • Some gaps, but good enough
  • Result: Team can start, questions arise later
  • ROI: 1x (regular productivity)

Overhead approach:

  • Spend 8 hours making the PRD perfect
  • Obsess over formatting and edge cases
  • No one reads the 20-page doc anyway
  • Result: Time wasted, no added value
  • ROI: <1x (negative productivity)

Example 2: Stakeholder Update

Leverage approach:

  • Create reusable dashboard that auto-update
Compartilhar X LinkedIn