Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

research-and-summarize

Distill complex topics into layered, actionable summaries. Start with the key insight, layer in detail, end with recommended next action.

64estrelas
Atualizado há 6 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add DevelopersGlobal/ai-agent-skills

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/research-and-summarize/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/research-and-summarize)
#ai

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Pesquisa e Web →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Pesquisa e Web toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Pesquisa e Web. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Overview

Information overload is the default state. This skill transforms any research task into a structured summary: headline insight first, context second, detail third, action last. Designed for decision-makers who need clarity, not comprehensiveness.

When to Use

  • Summarizing technical documentation or papers
  • Researching a technology choice
  • Briefing a team on a topic
  • Distilling a long document for a specific decision

Process

Step 1: Define the Research Question

  1. State the specific question being answered: "Should we use Kafka or RabbitMQ for our event pipeline?"
  2. State who the answer is for and what decision it enables.
  3. This scopes the research — don't gather information beyond what the decision needs.

Verify: Research question is specific enough to have a clear answer.

Step 2: Gather and Evaluate Sources

  1. Identify 3–5 high-quality, authoritative sources.
  2. For each source, note: recency, authority, potential bias.
  3. Cross-reference key claims across sources.
  4. Flag conflicting information — don't silently pick one side.

Verify: Key claims are supported by at least 2 independent sources.

Step 3: Write the Layered Summary

  1. Headline (1 sentence): The single most important insight.
  2. Key findings (3–5 bullets): Supporting evidence for the headline.
  3. Context and nuance (1–2 paragraphs): Caveats, tradeoffs, conditions under which the headline doesn't hold.
  4. What we don't know: Gaps in the available information.
  5. Recommended action: Given the findings, what should the reader do next?

Deliver: A structured summary with all 5 sections.

Step 4: Cite Sources

  1. Every factual claim is linked to a source.
  2. Include the date of each source (recency matters in fast-moving fields).

Verify: Every claim has a citation.

Common Rationalizations (and Rebuttals)

| Excuse | Rebuttal | |--------|----------| | "The topic is too complex to summarize" | The goal is to enable a decision, not to be comprehensive. Scope to the decision. | | "I'll just share the links" | Links are not summaries. Distillation is the value. |

Verification

  • [ ] Research question defined before research begins
  • [ ] Key claims cross-referenced across 2+ sources
  • [ ] Summary has: headline, findings, context, unknowns, action
  • [ ] Every factual claim has a citation with date

References

  • [think-before-coding skill](../think-before-coding/SKILL.md)
  • [idea-to-spec skill](../idea-to-spec/SKILL.md)
Compartilhar X LinkedIn