Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

research-digest

Generate structured research briefs from RSS feeds and web sources on any topic. Synthesizes multiple sources into actionable analysis with key findings, data points, expert perspectives, and content angles.

58estrelas
Atualizado há 5 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add thatrebeccarae/claude-marketing

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/research-digest/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/research-digest)
#ai

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Pesquisa e Web →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Pesquisa e Web toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Pesquisa e Web. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Research Digest

Generate structured research briefs from RSS feeds, web sources, and industry publications.

Install

git clone https://github.com/thatrebeccarae/claude-marketing.git && cp -r claude-marketing/skills/research-digest ~/.claude/skills/

Core Capabilities

  • Pull from RSS feeds, web search, and curated sources
  • Assess source credibility and recency
  • Cross-reference findings across multiple sources
  • Extract trends, data points, and expert opinions
  • Identify counter-arguments and nuance
  • Produce actionable research briefs

Workflow

1. Source Collection

Gather raw material from:

  • RSS feeds — industry blogs, news sites, newsletters (via any RSS reader/API)
  • Web search — targeted queries for recent coverage
  • Industry reports — analyst reports, whitepapers, earnings calls
  • Social/community — Reddit, Twitter/X, LinkedIn discussions

2. Source Assessment

Evaluate each source on:

| Criterion | Weight | Scale | |-----------|--------|-------| | Credibility | 30% | Original research > analysis > aggregation > opinion | | Recency | 25% | Last 7 days > 30 days > 90 days > older | | Relevance | 25% | Directly on topic > adjacent > tangential | | Uniqueness | 20% | Novel data > unique angle > common knowledge |

3. Synthesis

  • Identify convergent themes (3+ sources saying the same thing)
  • Flag divergent views (contradictions between sources)
  • Extract specific data points with citations
  • Note the "so what" — why this matters for the target audience

4. Brief Generation

Produce a structured markdown brief.

Brief Structure

# Research Brief: [Topic]
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Depth:** Quick scan / Standard / Deep dive
**Sources reviewed:** [count]

## Executive Summary
- [Key finding 1]
- [Key finding 2]
- [Key finding 3]

## Key Findings

### Finding 1: [Headline]
[2-3 paragraph analysis with source citations]

### Finding 2: [Headline]
[2-3 paragraph analysis with source citations]

## Data Points
| Metric | Value | Source | Date |
|--------|-------|--------|------|

## Expert Perspectives
- "[Quote]" — [Name, Title, Source]

## Counter-Arguments & Nuance
- [Opposing view with source]

## Content Angles
- [Angle 1: how to use this research in content]
- [Angle 2]

## Sources
1. [Source name] — [URL] — [Credibility: High/Medium/Low]

Options

| Option | Values | Default | |--------|--------|---------| | Time range | 24h, 7d, 30d, 90d | 7d | | Depth | quick, standard, deep | standard | | Focus | topic keyword or category | required | | Output | brief, report, raw-notes | brief |

Quality Standards

  1. Minimum 3 independent sources per key finding
  2. Recency bias toward last 30 days unless historical context is needed
  3. Always include counter-arguments — at least one contrarian or skeptical view
  4. Separate facts from opinions — clearly label which is which
  5. Link to original sources — never cite without attribution
  6. No speculation — if data is missing, say so rather than guessing

For source credibility framework and synthesis methodology, see [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md).

Compartilhar X LinkedIn