Full Research Pipeline: Idea → Experiments → Submission
⏱ External cadence: non-judgmental heartbeat only. An overnight /loop /
CronCreate heartbeat may wake, detect a stalled phase (no progress, dead
process, blocked on a freed resource) and nudge it forward — it may NEVER
decide the work is good (paper good enough, proof holds, claim supported).
Every such verdict stays on its own skill's internal cadence and terminates in
the cross-model jury. A heartbeat may say "keep going," never "good enough."
See
[shared-references/external-cadence.md](../shared-references/external-cadence.md)
(overnight-pipeline rule).
End-to-end autonomous research workflow for: $ARGUMENTS
Constants
- AUTO_PROCEED = true — When
true, Gate 1 auto-selects the top-ranked idea (highest pilot signal + novelty confirmed) and continues to implementation. Whenfalse, always waits for explicit user confirmation before proceeding. - ARXIV_DOWNLOAD = false — When
true,/research-litdownloads the top relevant arXiv PDFs during literature survey. Whenfalse(default), only fetches metadata via arXiv API. Passed through to/idea-discovery→/research-lit. - HUMAN_CHECKPOINT = false — When
true, the auto-review loops (Stage 3) pause after each round's review to let you see the score and provide custom modification instructions before fixes are implemented. Whenfalse(default), loops run fully autonomously. Passed through to/auto-review-loop. - REVIEWER_DIFFICULTY = medium — How adversarial the reviewer is.
medium(default): standard MCP review.hard: adds reviewer memory + debate protocol.nightmare: GPT reads repo directly viacodex exec+ memory + debate. Passed through to/auto-review-loop. - CODE_REVIEW = true — GPT-5.5 xhigh reviews experiment code before deployment. Catches logic bugs before wasting GPU hours. Set
falseto skip. Passed through to/experiment-bridge. - BASE_REPO = false — GitHub repo URL to use as base codebase. When set,
/experiment-bridgeclones the repo first and implements experiments on top of it. Whenfalse(default), writes code from scratch or reuses existing project files. Passed through to/experiment-bridge. - COMPACT = false — When
true, generates compact summary files for short-context models and session recovery. Passed through to/idea-discoveryand/experiment-bridge. - AUTO_WRITE = false — When
true, automatically invoke Workflow 3 (/paper-writing) after Stage 4. RequiresVENUEto be set. Whenfalse(default), Stage 4 generatesNARRATIVE_REPORT.mdand stops — user invokes/paper-writingmanually. - VENUE = ICLR — Target venue for paper writing (Stage 5). Only used when
AUTO_WRITE=true. Options:ICLR,NeurIPS,ICML,CVPR,ACL,AAAI,ACM,IEEE_CONF,IEEE_JOURNAL. - RENDER_HTML = true — When
true(default), auto-renderNARRATIVE_REPORT.mdto HTML at Stage 4 completion via/render-html. Uses--no-review(this is an internal handoff doc to/paper-writing, not a reviewer-facing final artifact — the upstream Stage 3 auto-review loop already cross-model-reviewed the claims). Setfalseto skip, or pass— render html: false. Non-blocking: if/render-htmlfails or Codex MCP is unavailable, log the failure and continue — the HTML view is a nice-to-have, not a Stage 4 prerequisite.
- RESUMABLE = true — When
true(default), the pipeline records per-stage state to.aris/runs/<run_id>.jsonso a crashed/interrupted run can resume via/research-pipeline — resume <run_id>instead of restarting. Stage status splitsdone(executor finished writing) fromaccepted(the stage's cross-model gate / deterministic verifier passed); resume re-validates anydone-but-unaccepted stage. Seeshared-references/resumable-runs.md.
💡 Override via argument, e.g., /research-pipeline "topic" — AUTO_PROCEED: false, human checkpoint: true, difficulty: nightmare, code review: false, base repo: https://github.com/org/project, auto_write: true, venue: NeurIPS.
Overview
This skill chains the entire research lifecycle into a single pipeline:
/idea-discovery → /experiment-bridge → /auto-review-loop → /paper-writing (optional)
├── Workflow 1 ──┤├── Workflow 1.5 ──┤├── Workflow 2 ───┤ ├── Workflow 3 ──┤
It orchestrates up to four major workflows in sequence. Workflow 3 (paper writing) is optional and controlled by AUTO_WRITE.
Resumable runs (— resume <run_id>)
This pipeline is long and can fail mid-run; it tracks per-stage state via run_state.py so you can resume instead of restarting (see [shared-references/resumable-runs.md](shared-references/resumable-runs.md)). Skip this whole section if RESUMABLE = false.
Resolve the helper via the canonical chain (integration-contract §2): .aris/tools/run_state.py → tools/run_state.py → $ARIS_REPO/tools/run_state.py (warn-and-skip if unresolved — never block the pipeline).
Phases, in order: idea-discovery, experiment-bridge, auto-review-loop, summary, paper-writing.
- At start: if
— resume <run_id>was passed, run
run_state.py resume <root> <run_id> — it prints the first non-accepted phase; begin the pipeline at that stage (re-run a running/failed stage; re-audit a done-but-unaccepted stage). Otherwise derive <run_id> from the direction slug + date and run_state.py start <root> <run_id> --phases "idea-discovery,experiment-bridge,auto-review-loop,summary,paper-writing".
- Per stage:
set <run_id> <phase> runningon entry; `set <run_id> <phase>
done --artifact <path>` once the stage's artifact is written.
- Mark
acceptedONLY after the stage's gate passes — never on the executor's
own say-so (run_state.py accept requires a recorded verdict id + reviewer):
| phase | what sets accepted | record as reviewer | |-------|----------------------|--------------------| | idea-discovery | Gate 1 cross-model jury / novelty-check passed | codex-gpt-5.5 + thread id | | experiment-bridge | experiments actually ran (jobs completed) — deterministic | deterministic:experiment-bridge | | auto-review-loop | the loop hit its positive STOP (score>=6 AND verdict∈{ready,almost} — codex's verdict) | codex-gpt-5.5 + final review trace id | | summary | NARRATIVE_REPORT.md written (+ rendered if RENDER_HTML) — deterministic | deterministic:summary | | paper-writing | submission audits passed (verify_paper_audits.sh exit 0) — deterministic | deterministic:verify_paper_audits.sh |
If AUTO_WRITE = false (default), paper-writing is not part of this run: after summary is accepted, set <run_id> paper-writing skipped so resume reports COMPLETE instead of pointing forever at a pending stage. Record each accept verdict_id as a durable handle — the codex thread/trace id, or the path/sha of the deterministic verifier's report (e.g. the verify_paper_audits.sh output JSON) — not just the reviewer label.
A stage left done (gate failed/ambiguous, or the run crashed before the gate) is re-validated on the next resume — the acceptance obligation is never skipped.
Pipeline
Stage 1: Idea Discovery (Workflow 1)
If RESEARCH_BRIEF.md exists in the project root, it will be automatically loaded as detailed context (replaces one-line prompt). See templates/RESEARCH_BRIEF_TEMPLATE.md.
Invoke the idea discovery pipeline:
/idea-discovery "$ARGUMENTS"
This internally runs: /research-lit → /idea-creator → /novelty-check → /research-review
Output: idea-stage/IDEA_REPORT.md with ranked, validated, pilot-tested ideas.
🚦 Gate 1 — Human Checkpoint:
After idea-stage/IDEA_REPORT.md is generated, pause and present the top ideas to the user:
📋 Idea Discovery complete. Top ideas:
1. [Idea 1 title] — Pilot: POSITIVE (+X%), Novelty: CONFIRMED
2. [Idea 2 title] — Pilot: WEAK POSITIVE (+Y%),