Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

review-ux-fix

Automated UX review → fix → re-review loop. Target is perfection (10/10). Fixes ALL severities including Suggestions — because UX polish compounds.

0estrelas
Atualizado há 5 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add cloverink/shipwright

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/review-ux-fix/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/review-ux-fix)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Desenvolvimento →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Desenvolvimento toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Desenvolvimento. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

/review-ux-fix

Iterative UX review-fix loop targeting perfection. Unlike /review-code-fix, this fixes every issue including Suggestions.

When to use: UX-only polish (CSS, spacing, micro-interactions) with no code logic changes.
Use [/review-full](../review-full/SKILL.md) instead if: your diff has logic/API changes too — it'll run code review alongside.
Called by: [/review-full](../review-full/SKILL.md) (auto-dispatched on frontend diffs — /ship Phase R reaches this transitively).

How it works

Round 1: UX review → list issues → fix ALL severities → re-review
Round 2: Review again → fix remaining → re-review
Round 3: Final attempt → fix → final review
         If still failing → report to user

Score Gate

Target is exactly 10/10. Any issue at any severity fails the gate.

Why perfection? UX issues compound. A slightly off button, a missing loading state, and a wonky mobile layout individually seem minor — together they make the product feel unpolished.

Why fix Suggestions too?

Code Suggestions are style preferences — reasonable people disagree. UX Suggestions are polish items — spacing, alignment, micro-interactions — that users feel. Fix them all.

Review Categories

  1. Design system compliance — tokens, typography, spacing
  2. Visual polish — alignment, consistency, whitespace rhythm
  3. Responsive behavior — mobile, tablet, desktop
  4. Loading states — skeleton/shimmer for async content
  5. Error states — user-friendly messages, retry options
  6. Empty states — helpful messaging when no data exists

<!-- CONFIGURE: Add your design system rules and component library -->

Relationship to /review-code-fix

Complementary, not overlapping:

  • /review-code-fix — correctness (types, security, performance, tests)
  • /review-ux-fix — experience (design, responsiveness, states, polish)
Compartilhar X LinkedIn