Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

seo-leak

SEO intelligence engine for competitive analysis. Estimates Q*, P*, and T* signals, analyzes NavBoost and E-E-A-T factors, identifies ranking gaps, orchestrates audit workflows, and provides actionable SEO strategy recommendations.

367estrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add aiskillstore/marketplace

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/seo-leak/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/seo-leak)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Segurança →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Segurança toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Segurança. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

SEO Leak Engine Skill

Overview

The SEO Leak Engine is the competitive SEO intelligence center. It:

  • Estimates Google's ranking signals (Q*, P*, T* factors)
  • Analyzes NavBoost (user behavior) signals
  • Evaluates E-E-A-T (Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness)
  • Identifies ranking gaps vs. competitors
  • Orchestrates comprehensive SEO audits
  • Provides actionable SEO strategy recommendations

Based on research into Google's ranking factors and signals, the engine provides deeper competitive intelligence than traditional SEO tools.

Core Capabilities

1. Google Ranking Signals (Q*, P*, T*)

**Query Signal (Q\*)** - What's the user searching for?

COMPONENTS:
- Query intent: informational, navigational, commercial, transactional
- Query language: exact match, semantic variations, long-tail
- Query freshness: real-time (news), evergreen (permanent), seasonal
- Query authority: brand searches, expert searches, general searches

EXAMPLE ANALYSIS:
Query: "best project management software for startups"
- Intent: Commercial (comparing products)
- Freshness: Evergreen with seasonal variations (Q1/Q4)
- Authority: Review sites, startup blogs, tools comparison
- Opportunity: Content comparison guides, ROI calculators

How to use:
- Understand what Google thinks the user wants
- Align content to that intent
- Create content only if you can satisfy intent better than competitors

**Page Signal (P\*)** - How well does this page answer?

COMPONENTS:
- Content quality: depth, uniqueness, accuracy
- Content type: blog post, product page, comparison, guide
- Content freshness: when was it last updated?
- Content structure: headers, sections, readability
- Content format: text, video, interactive, images
- Page load speed: Core Web Vitals, first byte time
- Mobile optimization: responsive, tap targets, viewport

EXAMPLE ANALYSIS:
Competitor ranking for "project management software for startups"
- Title: "Best Project Management Tools for Startups (2025)"
- Word count: 4,200 words
- Sections: 12 tools reviewed with pros/cons
- Images: 24 (tool screenshots, UI demos)
- Video: 2 embedded reviews (8 min, 12 min)
- Updates: 7 updates in past 12 months
- CWV: 89/100
- Mobile: 95/100

Signal Assessment:
- Content completeness: STRONG (covers many tools)
- Freshness: STRONG (regularly updated)
- UX: STRONG (videos, images, structure)
- Speed: GOOD (needs improvement)

What you need to beat this:
- More tools (add 15-20, not just 12)
- Better UX (faster load, better interactive demo)
- More regular updates (quarterly vs. annual)
- Better video (high-quality, custom reviews)

**Trust Signal (T\*)** - Can Google trust this source?

COMPONENTS:
- Author credentials: expertise, credentials, experience
- Site authority: backlinks, domain age, traffic
- Site safety: no malware, SSL certificate, no hacking history
- Topical authority: content in this topic area
- Update frequency: is content kept fresh?
- User feedback: reviews, ratings, comments
- Citation consistency: mentioned across web consistently

EXAMPLE ANALYSIS:
Your site vs. competitor (G2, Capterra, TrustRadius)
- Domain age: Competitor 15 years, you 2 years (disadvantage)
- Backlinks: Competitor 45k, you 1.2k (large gap)
- Mentions: Competitor in major publications, you in niche blogs
- Author: Competitor has staff writers with bylines, you single author
- Updates: Competitor posts weekly, you post monthly

Gap Analysis:
- Author credibility: Build author bios, credentials pages
- Site authority: Earn 500+ quality backlinks (via PR, partnerships)
- Topical authority: Publish 50+ articles in next 6 months
- Fresh content: Shift to weekly publishing cadence

Realistic timeline to close gap: 12-18 months

2. NavBoost Signal Analysis

What is NavBoost? NavBoost is Google's aggregated user behavior signal - how users interact with search results.

Components:

CLICK-THROUGH RATE (CTR)
- What % of searchers click your result?
- Why: Higher CTR = more relevant
- Factors: Title quality, snippet clarity, SERP position

ENGAGEMENT
- Do users stay on your page?
- Why: Longer dwell time = more helpful
- Factors: Content quality, page speed, structure

POGO-STICKING
- Do users return to Google?
- Why: Returning means result wasn't what they wanted
- Factors: Content doesn't match intent, poor UX, outdated info

SKIP RATE
- Do users skip your result for others?
- Why: Users prefer alternatives
- Factors: Competitors have better content, your snippet is unclear

HOW TO MEASURE:
- GSC CTR: Actual clicks / impressions
- Dwell time: Analytics session duration
- Bounce rate: Users leaving without action
- Search return rate: Users going back to search

OPTIMIZATION:
1. CTR: Improve title tags and meta descriptions
   - Make headlines compelling
   - Add numbers, power words
   - Include relevant keywords

2. Engagement: Keep users on page
   - Lead with value in first 100 words
   - Use subheadings for scanability
   - Add interactive elements (table of contents)
   - Include images and videos
   - Improve page speed

3. Anti-pogo: Match search intent perfectly
   - Understand what searchers actually want
   - Update if search intent changed since you ranked
   - Add competitor comparison if needed

4. Skip rate: Analyze competitor advantages
   - Read top 3 ranking pages
   - Note: unique elements they have
   - Add those elements + your differentiation

3. E-E-A-T Analysis

Expertise: Does the author know what they're talking about?

SIGNALS:
- Author credentials: degrees, certifications, experience
- Author byline: named author with photo, bio
- Author social proof: speaking, publications, followers
- Content depth: goes beyond surface, cites research
- Technical accuracy: no errors, proper terminology

HOW TO BUILD:
1. Create author profiles with credentials
2. Link to author's LinkedIn, Twitter
3. Get quoted in industry publications
4. Publish technical/research-backed content
5. Include citations and sources

Authoritativeness: Is this site recognized as an authority?

SIGNALS:
- Backlinks: Who links to you and why?
- Media mentions: Quoted in major publications?
- Industry recognition: Awards, certifications?
- Content volume: How much content on this topic?
- Consistency: Regular publishing?

HOW TO BUILD:
1. Earn backlinks through PR, partnerships, original research
2. Get featured in industry publications
3. Win industry awards (even local)
4. Publish research/original data
5. Consistent publishing schedule

Trustworthiness: Can users trust this source with important decisions?

SIGNALS:
- Site safety: No malware, legitimate business
- Transparency: Clear about who owns site
- Contact information: Actual address, phone, email
- User reviews: Positive ratings on third-party sites
- Privacy policy: Clear data handling
- Source citations: Where information comes from

HOW TO BUILD:
1. Security basics: HTTPS, regular security audits
2. Business information: About page with real details
3. Contact info: Multiple ways to reach you
4. Encourage reviews: Ask satisfied customers
5. Privacy policy: Clear, comprehensive
6. Source citations: Link to research and sources

OVERALL E-E-A-T SCORE:

Example: Project Management Software Review Site

EXPERTISE: 7/10
- Most reviewers have 3-5 years experience (good)
- Some lack software engineering background (gap for technical audience)
- Improvement: Add reviewers with deeper technical expertise

AUTHORITATIVENESS: 5/10
- 10k backlinks (moderate)
- Limited media mentions
- No major industry recognitions
- Improvement:
  - Publish original research (e.g., "State of PM Software 2025")
  - Pitch articles to major tech publications
  - Win or sponsor industry awards

TRUSTWORTHINESS: 8/10
- Transparent about ratings criteria
- Clear editorial policy
- User reviews available
- One negative: Affiliate links not clearly disclosed (fix)
- Improvement: Clearly label all affiliate relationships

OVE
Compartilhar X LinkedIn