Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

story-workflow

Refine, analyze, improve, and groom user stories / work items for quality — readiness reports, template restructuring, adaptive gap-filling, and codebase-aware technical grooming. USER-ENTRY and HUMAN-ONLY — invoke only when the user explicitly runs /story-workflow <command>; never autonomously from conversation, never from a subagent (guard-enforced). Distinct from the /dev-workflow pipeline: thi

17estrelas
Atualizado há 2 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add MostAshraf/ai-sdlc-harness

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/story-workflow/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/story-workflow)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de DevOps e Infra →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de DevOps e Infra toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de DevOps e Infra. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

story-workflow — story-quality refinement (PO-facing)

Improves work-item quality through four commands. Read-mostly: it fetches a work item, helps shape it, and — only with the user's consent — posts the result back as a comment. It never starts a dev run and never touches ai/<run>/ run state.

Every harness call is ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/harness <verb> … — the full path, run by you via Bash (a bare harness is not on PATH, and shell variables set in one Bash call do not persist to the next). Non-zero exit = refused; read the JSON error and act on it.

Usage

/story-workflow <command> <work-item-id> [session-notes…]

<command> is one of analyze, refine, improve, groom. <work-item-id> is whatever the configured provider uses — a number (ADO / GitHub / GitLab), a key (PROJ-123, Jira), or, for local-markdown, the story's id (the file stem inside provider.stories_dir, e.g. WORK-7 for WORK-7.md — not a path). Any trailing tokens are session notes, passed through to improve and refine.

Routing

| command | file | one-line | |---|---|---| | improve | commands/improve.md | adaptive single-pass: assess → gap-fill → draft (the recommended default) | | analyze | commands/analyze.md | standalone readiness report with flags | | refine | commands/refine.md | slow, section-by-section interactive restructure | | groom | commands/groom.md | codebase-aware per-repo technical notes |

Parse $ARGUMENTS: the first token is the command, the second is the work-item id, the rest are notes. If the command is missing or unknown, print the usage line plus the table above and stop — do not guess. If the id is missing, ask for it — never proceed without one. Then read the one matching command file and follow it (context economy: load a single command file, not all four).

Before routing

  1. Confirm the workspace is bootstrapped: .claude/context/provider.yaml must

exist. If it doesn't, /init-workspace never ran — send the user there and stop. The active provider is resolved from config by the harness; you never hand-pick it.

  1. The recipe for fetching a work item and posting a result back — for every

provider and both transports — lives once in shared/provider-io.md. Read it; the commands cite it instead of repeating it.

  1. Domain and convention context (for improve and groom) lives once in

shared/context.md.

Guardrails (all four commands)

  • On a remote provider, never edit the item's Description or Acceptance-Criteria

fields — post back as a comment only. The single exception is a local-markdown story the user explicitly asks you to rewrite in place; see shared/provider-io.md.

  • Never invent business requirements. A gap is a question for the human, not an

assertion of what "should" be there.

  • Mirror the user's domain language; don't rename their "platform" to "system".
  • Files in templates/ are read-only references — don't modify them while a

command runs.

  • If a story is already well-formed, say so. "This looks ready" is a valid,

valuable outcome — don't manufacture flags or questions to look busy.

Compartilhar X LinkedIn