Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

structured-output

Formats review deliverables with consistent structure for comparable findings. Use when finalizing any review or analysis that must be shared or compared.

314estrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add athola/claude-night-market

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/structured-output-athola/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/structured-output-athola)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Pesquisa e Web →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Pesquisa e Web toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Pesquisa e Web. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Table of Contents

  • [When to Use](#when-to-use)
  • [Activation Patterns](#activation-patterns)
  • [Required TodoWrite Items](#required-todowrite-items)
  • [Step 1: Select Template (structured-output:template-selected)](#step-1:-select-template-(structured-output:template-selected))
  • [Step 2: Format Findings (structured-output:findings-formatted)](#step-2:-format-findings-(structured-output:findings-formatted))
  • [Step 3: Assign Actions (structured-output:actions-assigned)](#step-3:-assign-actions-(structured-output:actions-assigned))
  • [Step 4: Attach Appendix (structured-output:appendix-attached)](#step-4:-attach-appendix-(structured-output:appendix-attached))
  • [Output Quality Checklist](#output-quality-checklist)
  • [Exit Criteria](#exit-criteria)

Structured Output

When To Use

  • When finalizing any review or analysis.
  • To format findings in a consistent way that names specific next steps.
  • Before presenting results to stakeholders or committing them to documentation.

When NOT To Use

  • Capturing evidence during analysis - use proof-of-work
  • Reviewing changes - use diff-analysis or review-core first

Activation Patterns

Trigger Keywords: format, structure, deliverable, report, organize, present, consistent Contextual Cues:

  • "format this as a report" or "structure the output"
  • "create a deliverable" or "present these findings"
  • "organize this consistently" or "standardize the format"
  • "make this actionable" or "prepare for stakeholders"

Auto-Load When: Finalizing any analysis deliverable or when consistent formatting is requested.

Required TodoWrite Items

  1. structured-output:template-selected
  2. structured-output:findings-formatted
  3. structured-output:actions-assigned
  4. structured-output:appendix-attached

Mark each item complete as you finish the corresponding step.

Step 1: Select Template (structured-output:template-selected)

  • Choose output format based on deliverable type:
  • Review Report: Summary, Findings, Recommendations, Evidence.
  • PR Description: Summary, Changes, Test Plan, Notes.
  • Release Notes: Highlights, Breaking Changes, Fixes, Credits.
  • Incident Report: Timeline, Impact, Root Cause, Remediation.
  • Confirm audience and required detail level.

Step 2: Format Findings (structured-output:findings-formatted)

  • Use consistent finding structure:

``markdown ### [SEVERITY] Finding Title Location: file.rs:123 Category: Security | Performance | Correctness | Style Description: Brief explanation of the issue. Evidence: [E1, E2] - Reference to evidence log. Recommendation: Specific remediation steps. ` Verification: Run the command with --help` flag to verify availability.

  • Severity levels: CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW, INFO.
  • Order findings by severity, then by file location.

Step 3: Assign Actions (structured-output:actions-assigned)

  • Convert findings to action items with assignee and priority:

```markdown ## Action Items

  • [ ] [HIGH] Fix SQL injection in auth.py:45 (@security-team, P1)
  • [ ] [MEDIUM] Add input validation to API endpoint (@backend, P2)
  • [ ] [LOW] Update deprecated dependency (@devops, P3)

`` Verification: Run the command with --help` flag to verify availability.

  • Include owner assignment where known.
  • Add priority indicators (P1/P2/P3) for triage.
  • Note dependencies between actions.

Step 4: Attach Appendix (structured-output:appendix-attached)

  • Compile supporting materials:

```markdown ## Appendix ### A. Commands Run [Full evidence log from imbue:proof-of-work]

### B. External References [Citations and documentation links]

### C. Raw Data [Large outputs, full diffs, or data exports] `` Verification: Run the command with --help` flag to verify availability.

  • Keep main report concise; details in appendix.
  • validate appendix is navigable with clear section headers.

Output Quality Checklist

Before finalizing:

  • [ ] All findings have evidence references.
  • [ ] Severity levels are justified.
  • [ ] Recommendations are specific and name the next step.
  • [ ] No orphaned sections or placeholder text.
  • [ ] Format renders correctly in target medium (GitHub, Confluence, etc.).

Exit Criteria

  • Todos completed with formatted deliverable.
  • Output follows selected template structure.
  • Stakeholders can act on findings without clarification.
Compartilhar X LinkedIn