Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

subagent-testing

Test skills via TDD in fresh subagents. Use when validating behavior or preventing bias.

314estrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add athola/claude-night-market

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/subagent-testing/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/subagent-testing)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Desenvolvimento →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Desenvolvimento toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Desenvolvimento. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Subagent Testing - TDD for Skills

Test skills with fresh subagent instances to prevent priming bias and validate effectiveness.

Table of Contents

  1. [Overview](#overview)
  2. [Why Fresh Instances Matter](#why-fresh-instances-matter)
  3. [Testing Methodology](#testing-methodology)
  4. [Quick Start](#quick-start)
  5. [Detailed Testing Guide](#detailed-testing-guide)
  6. [Success Criteria](#success-criteria)

Overview

Fresh instances prevent priming: Each test uses a new Claude conversation to verify the skill's impact is measured, not conversation history effects.

Why Fresh Instances Matter

The Priming Problem

Running tests in the same conversation creates bias:

  • Prior context influences responses
  • Skill effects get mixed with conversation history
  • Can't isolate skill's true impact

Fresh Instance Benefits

  • Isolation: Each test starts clean
  • Reproducibility: Consistent baseline state
  • Measurement: Clear before/after comparison
  • Validation: Proves skill effectiveness, not priming

Testing Methodology

Three-phase TDD-style approach:

Phase 1: Baseline Testing (RED)

Test without skill to establish baseline behavior.

Phase 2: With-Skill Testing (GREEN)

Test with skill loaded to measure improvements.

Phase 3: Rationalization Testing (REFACTOR)

Test skill's anti-rationalization guardrails.

Quick Start

# 1. Create baseline tests (without skill)
# Use 5 diverse scenarios
# Document full responses

# 2. Create with-skill tests (fresh instances)
# Load skill explicitly
# Use identical prompts
# Compare to baseline

# 3. Create rationalization tests
# Test anti-rationalization patterns
# Verify guardrails work

Detailed Testing Guide

For complete testing patterns, examples, and templates:

  • [Testing Patterns](modules/testing-patterns.md) - Full TDD methodology
  • [Test Examples](modules/testing-patterns.md) - Baseline, with-skill, rationalization tests
  • [Analysis Templates](modules/testing-patterns.md) - Scoring and comparison frameworks

Success Criteria

  • Baseline: Document 5+ diverse baseline scenarios
  • Improvement: ≥50% improvement in skill-related metrics
  • Consistency: Results reproducible across fresh instances
  • Rationalization Defense: Guardrails prevent ≥80% of rationalization attempts

See Also

  • skill-authoring: Creating effective skills
  • bulletproof-skill: Anti-rationalization patterns
  • test-skill: Automated skill testing command
Compartilhar X LinkedIn