Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

swiftdata-code-review

Reviews SwiftData code for model design, queries, concurrency, and migrations. Use when reviewing .swift files with import SwiftData, @Model, @Query, @ModelActor, or VersionedSchema.

65estrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: Apache-2.0

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add existential-birds/beagle

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/swiftdata-code-review/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/swiftdata-code-review)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Desenvolvimento →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Desenvolvimento toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Desenvolvimento. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

SwiftData Code Review

Quick Reference

| Issue Type | Reference | |------------|-----------| | @Model, @Attribute, @Relationship, delete rules | [references/model-design.md](references/model-design.md) | | @Query, #Predicate, FetchDescriptor, #Index | [references/queries.md](references/queries.md) | | @ModelActor, ModelContext, background operations | [references/concurrency.md](references/concurrency.md) | | VersionedSchema, MigrationStage, lightweight/custom | [references/migrations.md](references/migrations.md) |

Hard gates (before reporting findings)

Run in order; do not assert an issue until the gate for that issue passes.

  1. Scope — pass when: You have the target .swift path(s) and confirmed SwiftData surface in scope (e.g. import SwiftData, @Model, @Query, @ModelActor, VersionedSchema, or migration types). If none apply, stop or narrow scope with one sentence.
  2. Reference — pass when: For each checklist area you evaluate (models, queries, concurrency, migrations), you opened the matching references/*.md from the Quick Reference table or wrote N/A: no <area> in this review with a one-line reason.
  3. Evidence — pass when: Every finding uses the [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE header (line range allowed) from the file you read; no finding without a cite.
  4. Report — pass when: Findings list cites first (or inline) using [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE, then severity or checklist grouping—no uncited assertions.

Review Checklist

  • [ ] Models marked final (subclassing crashes)
  • [ ] @Relationship decorator on ONE side only (not both)
  • [ ] Delete rules explicitly set (not relying on default .nullify)
  • [ ] Relationships initialized to empty arrays, not default objects
  • [ ] Batch operations used for bulk inserts (append(contentsOf:))
  • [ ] @Query not loading thousands of items on main thread
  • [ ] External values in predicates captured in local variables
  • [ ] Scalar comparisons in predicates (not object references)
  • [ ] @ModelActor used for background operations
  • [ ] PersistentIdentifier/DTOs used to pass data between actors
  • [ ] VersionedSchema defined for each shipped version
  • [ ] MigrationPlan passed to ModelContainer

When to Load References

  • Reviewing @Model or relationships -> model-design.md
  • Reviewing @Query or #Predicate -> queries.md
  • Reviewing @ModelActor or background work -> concurrency.md
  • Reviewing schema changes or migrations -> migrations.md

Review Questions

  1. Could this relationship assignment cause NULL foreign keys?
  2. Is @Relationship on both sides creating circular references?
  3. Could this @Query block the main thread with large datasets?
  4. Are model objects being passed between actors unsafely?
  5. Would schema changes require a migration plan?
Compartilhar X LinkedIn