Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

tdd-migrate

Um fluxo de trabalho TDD para migrações que orquestra agentes e garante crescimento zero do contexto principal.

3.8kestrelas
Atualizado há 9 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/tdd-migrate/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/tdd-migrate)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Automação →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Automação toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Automação. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

TDD Migrate

Orchestrate TDD migrations with agents doing all work. Main context stays clean.

When to Use

  • "Port X from Python to TypeScript"
  • "Create N adapters following existing pattern"
  • "Migrate module to new architecture"
  • "TDD implementation of multiple similar items"

Parameters

/tdd-migrate <source_path> <target_path> --pattern <reference> --items "item1,item2,item3"
  • source_path: Path to analyze (existing code)
  • target_path: Where to create new code
  • pattern: Reference file/pattern to follow
  • items: Comma-separated list of things to create

Workflow

Phase 0: YAML TODO List
    │
    ▼
Phase 1: TLDR Analysis ─────────────────┐
    │                                    │
    ▼                                    │ Parallel scouts
Phase 2: Write Failing Tests ───────────┤ per item
    │                                    │
    ▼                                    │
Phase 3: Implement (minimal) ───────────┤
    │                                    │
    ▼                                    │
Phase 4: Build + Pass Tests ────────────┘
    │
    ▼
Phase 5: QLTY Check ────────────────────┐
    │                                    │ Parallel
Phase 6: Review Agent Validates ────────┘
    │
    ▼
Phase 7: TLDR Diff (new vs reference)
    │
    ▼
Phase 8: Fix Issues (if any)
    │
    ▼
Complete

Key Principles

  1. Main context = orchestration only
  2. Never read files directly (use scout)
  3. Never implement directly (use kraken/spark)
  4. Never run tests directly (use validator)
  5. Only pipe context and coordinate
  1. Agents do ALL work

| Task | Agent | |------|-------| | Explore/analyze | scout | | Write tests + implement | kraken | | Quick fixes | spark | | Run tests/validate | validator | | Code review | critic |

  1. Parallel where independent
  2. All items can be implemented in parallel if independent
  3. Review + QLTY run in parallel
  4. TLDR analysis runs in parallel with planning
  1. Review after each major step
  2. After implementation: critic reviews
  3. After fixes: validator re-validates

Instructions

Step 0: Create YAML TODO

Write a YAML plan file to thoughts/shared/plans/<name>-tdd.yaml:

---
title: <Migration Name>
date: <today>
type: implementation-plan
approach: TDD (test → build → pass → review)

items:
  - name: item1
    file: <target_path>/item1.ts
    test: <target_path>/__tests__/item1.test.ts
    deps: []
  - name: item2
    # ...

reference: <pattern_file>

workflow:
  per_item:
    1: Write failing test
    2: Implement minimal
    3: Build
    4: Pass test
    5: QLTY check
    6: Review
  final:
    7: Integration test
    8: TLDR diff

Step 1: Launch Scout Agents (parallel)

Task (scout): Analyze <source_path> with TLDR
Task (scout): Analyze <pattern> to understand structure
Task (scout): Read migration handoff if exists

Step 2: Launch Kraken Agents (parallel per item)

For each item, launch ONE kraken that does full TDD:

Task (kraken): Implement <item> using TDD workflow
  1. Read pattern file
  2. Write failing test
  3. Implement
  4. Run: bun test <test_file>
  5. Run: qlty check <impl_file>

Step 3: Review + Validate (parallel)

Task (critic): Review all new files against pattern
Task (validator): Run full test suite
Task (validator): QLTY check all files

Step 4: Fix Issues

If critic/validator found issues:

Task (spark): Fix <specific issue>
Task (validator): Re-validate

Step 5: TLDR Diff

Task (validator): TLDR diff new files vs reference
  - tldr structure <new_file> --lang <lang>
  - tldr structure <reference> --lang <lang>
  - Compare patterns

Step 6: Update Continuity

Update ledger with completed work.

Example: Rigg Adapters

/tdd-migrate /Users/cosimo/Documents/rigg/src/sdk/providers \
  /Users/cosimo/Documents/rigg/src/sdk/providers \
  --pattern lmstudio.ts \
  --items "xai,cerebras,togetherai,deepinfra,perplexity"

Resulted in:

  • 5 parallel kraken agents
  • 39 tests passing
  • All adapters working
  • ~15 minutes total

Anti-Patterns (AVOID)

| Bad | Good | |-----|------| | Read files in main context | Launch scout agent | | Write code in main context | Launch kraken/spark agent | | Run tests in main context | Launch validator agent | | Skip review | Always launch critic | | Sequential items | Parallel krakens | | Fix in main context | Launch spark |

Agent Prompts

Scout (analysis)

Explore <path> to understand:
1. Structure/patterns
2. Interfaces/types
3. Dependencies
Return actionable summary for implementation.

Kraken (TDD)

Implement <item> using TDD:
1. Read <pattern> for structure
2. Write failing test to <test_path>
3. Implement minimal to <impl_path>
4. Run: <test_command>
5. Run: qlty check <impl_path>
Report: status, issues, files created.

Critic (review)

Review <files> against <pattern>:
1. Pattern compliance
2. Type safety
3. Missing registrations
4. Security issues
DO NOT edit. Report issues only.

Spark (fix)

Fix <specific issue>:
1. Read <file>
2. Make minimal edit
3. Verify fix

Validator (test)

Validate <files>:
1. Run <test_command>
2. Run qlty check
3. Report pass/fail/issues

Success Criteria

  • [ ] All tests pass
  • [ ] QLTY reports no issues
  • [ ] Critic found no critical issues
  • [ ] TLDR diff shows pattern compliance
  • [ ] All items registered/exported properly
Compartilhar X LinkedIn