Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

term-comparator

Compara propostas de investimento com padrões de mercado e identifica valores atípicos.

1.4kestrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: MIT

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add a5c-ai/babysitter

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/term-comparator/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/term-comparator)
#ai

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Automação →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Automação toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Automação. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

Term Comparator

Overview

The Term Comparator skill analyzes term sheets against market standards and fund precedents to identify outliers and support negotiation strategy. It enables data-driven term negotiations and ensures consistency with market norms.

Capabilities

Market Standard Analysis

  • Compare terms against market benchmarks
  • Identify investor-favorable vs. founder-favorable terms
  • Track market term evolution over time
  • Analyze terms by stage and sector

Precedent Comparison

  • Compare against fund's historical terms
  • Analyze co-investor standard terms
  • Review competitor term patterns
  • Build term precedent database

Outlier Identification

  • Flag unusual or non-standard provisions
  • Identify terms outside normal ranges
  • Highlight aggressive or founder-unfriendly terms
  • Note missing standard protections

Negotiation Support

  • Suggest negotiation priorities
  • Provide market data for negotiations
  • Identify trade-off opportunities
  • Model term package alternatives

Usage

Compare to Market

Input: Term sheet, market comparison parameters
Process: Analyze against benchmarks
Output: Market comparison report, variance analysis

Compare to Precedent

Input: Term sheet, precedent set
Process: Compare against historical terms
Output: Precedent comparison, consistency analysis

Identify Outliers

Input: Term sheet, outlier thresholds
Process: Flag unusual terms
Output: Outlier report, risk assessment

Support Negotiation

Input: Current terms, priorities
Process: Analyze trade-offs, suggest approach
Output: Negotiation strategy, talking points

Comparison Dimensions

| Dimension | Market Range | Notes | |-----------|--------------|-------| | Liquidation Preference | 1x non-participating standard | Participating increasingly rare | | Anti-dilution | Broad-based weighted average | Full ratchet rare | | Board Composition | Investor minority or balanced | Depends on stage | | Protective Provisions | Standard set | Watch for unusual vetos | | Option Pool | 10-15% refresh | Check pre vs. post |

Integration Points

  • Term Sheet Drafting Process: Validate generated terms
  • Definitive Document Negotiation: Support doc negotiations
  • Term Sheet Generator: Ensure generated terms are standard
  • Term Sheet Negotiator (Agent): Support agent negotiations

Market Data Sources

  • NVCA survey data
  • Fund precedent database
  • Co-investor term patterns
  • Legal firm market reports
  • Industry benchmarking services

Best Practices

  1. Maintain current market benchmark data
  2. Consider stage and sector context
  3. Weight precedent by recency
  4. Distinguish must-haves from nice-to-haves
  5. Consider full term package, not just individual terms
Compartilhar X LinkedIn