Explorar skills

Use when you are about to create a git commit — generates a conventional commit message with type(scope): TICKET description format. Auto-detects ticket from branch name or arguments. Always use this instead of running git commit directly.

Use when you encounter a bug, error, or unexpected behavior during a task — follows a reproduce → isolate → fix → verify cycle. Invoke this instead of guessing at a fix.

Use when starting work on a GitHub or Jira issue — reads the issue, explores affected code, and produces a ready-to-execute implementation plan. Invoke this at the start of any ticket-driven task instead of jumping straight to /plan.

Use at the start of a session on an unfamiliar or returning project — reads architecture docs, recent activity, open work, and coding conventions to prime context before starting any task. Invoke this before /plan or /issue when you haven't worked on the project recently.

Use before writing any code for a new feature, task, or significant change — produces a structured implementation plan with affected files, ordered steps, risks, and open questions. Always invoke this at the start of any non-trivial implementation task and wait for explicit approval before writing code.

Use when you are about to open a GitHub pull request — generates a semver-prefixed title ([PATCH/MINOR/MAJOR] TICKET: description) and structured body from commits. Always invoke this instead of running gh pr create directly.

Use when a file or module has grown too complex — removes unnecessary abstractions, dead code, and over-engineering without changing behavior. Invoke after implementing a feature when the code feels over-engineered.

Use before implementing a complex, high-stakes, or cross-cutting feature — produces a full technical specification including data model, API contract, edge cases, and open questions. The planning layer above /plan. Invoke this when /plan alone isn't detailed enough.

Use when you want to surface accumulated technical debt — scans for TODOs, deprecated APIs, dead code, and code quality issues. Produces a prioritized list with age and estimated effort. Run periodically or before planning a refactor sprint.

Use when you need to document E2E test cases for a feature or bug fix that can't be covered by unit or integration tests alone. Auto-detects ticket from branch name. Reuses codebase context from /plan if already run; falls back to git diff + explorer when invoked standalone. Outputs to a markdown file by default.

Adversarial test hardening — domain-lens behavioral attacks on contracts before implementation

Implement stubs until all tests pass