aneja5

Use when a task is complete and ready for review, when reviewing a PR, when validating an implementation against its contract, when checking quality before merging, or when a five-axis quality gate is needed before approving code.

Use when designing a new schema, writing a migration, adding or auditing indexes, reviewing query performance, choosing between hard delete and soft delete, or establishing database conventions for a project.

Use when building UI that ships to users, when reviewing for WCAG AA compliance, when adding keyboard navigation, when ensuring screen reader support, when auditing color contrast, or when preparing a UI surface for an EU or government customer.

Use when .forge/prd.md exists and the system needs a structural design before task breakdown, when modules will be implemented in parallel and need interface contracts to prevent integration failures, or when non-obvious technical decisions need to be recorded for future reference.

Use when establishing brand foundations before any design work, when two products need to feel related, when defining voice and tone for microcopy, or when logo usage and visual identity rules need documenting.

Use when user says "research competitors", "competitive analysis", "how do we compare to X", when planning go-to-market and needs competitive positioning, when assessing the competitive landscape before launch, or when objection handling and win/lose scenarios need to be documented.

Use when preparing a sales demo, an investor demo, a partner walkthrough, or any scripted product flow with talking points. Use 48-72 hours before the live demo so there's time for dry-run, seed data verification, and fallback rehearsal.

Use when designing REST endpoints, defining error envelopes, setting a versioning or deprecation policy, choosing pagination shape, adding idempotency to mutations, reviewing API contracts, or when two services need a stable interface between them.

Use when building a component catalog, when standardizing component props and states across a product, when two engineers are about to build competing versions of the same component, or before a major UI build sprint.

Use when user says "validate this", "get feedback", "cross-validate", "what are we missing", when seeking external review before committing to major decisions, when stress-testing a design with senior reviewers, or when reviewer responses need to be synthesized into actionable changes.

Use when building dashboards, charts, or data displays, when defining chart type selection rules, when standardizing data color encoding, or when charts look inconsistent across the product.

Use when reviewing documentation quality, when establishing README and changelog standards, when preventing doc rot, when in-code comments duplicate code instead of explaining intent, or when subdirectories of a repo have no documentation entry point.

Use when establishing error handling patterns for a project, when adding retry logic, circuit breakers, or graceful degradation, when reviewing how a service handles failures, or when an incident reveals that a failure mode was silently swallowed.

Use when implementing features or fixing bugs test-first, when user mentions "red-green-refactor", when test discipline is required for a specific task, when incremental-implementation needs TDD enforcement, or when a behavior change needs a failing test before any code is written.

Use when something is broken, a test is failing, behavior is wrong, when investigating a production incident, when a user reports a bug, when a feature works locally but not in another environment, or when the system behaves differently than the contract specifies.

Use when establishing visual foundations for a new product, when defining design tokens, when building or auditing a component library, before any UI work begins on a fresh codebase, or when the existing UI has drifted into hex codes and magic numbers.

Use when upgrading forge-skills across a major version (e.g., from v2.x or v3.0/3.1 to v3.2+), when .forge/ artifacts exist but lack forge:meta headers, when forge-sync reports a wall of "untracked" rows, or when the user asks "why doesn't sync see my existing files".

Use when checking if .forge/ artifacts are stale after a change to requirements, architecture, or any upstream artifact. Use before running /build, /review, or /ship to confirm the artifact chain is consistent. Use when the user says "is anything out of date" or "what needs to be regenerated".

Use when user describes a new idea, project, or feature they haven't fully thought through, when an idea needs to be pressure-tested before writing a spec, when assumptions about users, business model, or distribution are unstated, or when the user wants to surface what they don't know before committing engineering effort.

Use when .forge/tasks.yaml exists and implementation is starting, when executing a planned task list one task at a time, when a feature must ship in independently-verifiable slices, or when contracts in .forge/contracts/ need to be implemented against acceptance criteria.

Use when deciding how users interact with UI elements — expand vs navigate, modal vs bottom sheet, swipe gestures, tap targets, optimistic UI, loading patterns, or undo for destructive actions. Use before features get built so every screen inherits the same rules.

Use when defining a project's test approach, when choosing what gets tested at unit vs integration vs e2e level, when setting per-component coverage targets, when reviewing test quality, or when CI is slow / flaky and tests need a strategy reset.

Use when implementation, review, security, scalability, or incident work reveals that an upstream .forge/ artifact is wrong, when a contract is missing an operation, when an ADR is being contradicted by a current need, when security recommends architecture changes, or when the user says "we discovered the spec is wrong".

Use when committing work, creating branches, preparing PRs, resolving merge conflicts, when grouping related changes into commits, when cleaning up history before merging, or when deciding what should be a separate commit vs squashed.

Use when user says "go to market", "GTM", "how do we sell this", "find customers", when planning a launch, when defining the ideal customer profile, when designing a pilot program before broad launch, or when a structured sales motion needs to be documented.

Use when defining severity levels and on-call procedures, when creating a runbook for a critical service, when an incident is actively happening and a structured response is needed, or when writing a blameless postmortem after Sev1 or Sev2 resolution.

Use when adding logging, structured logs, metrics, traces, or alerts to a service, when designing dashboards, when defining SLOs, when investigating "how will I know if this breaks", or when production logs are too noisy to debug from.

Use when defining how pages are assembled from components, when establishing layout grids, when deciding responsive collapse strategies, or when multiple routes have inconsistent layouts.

Use when 3+ independent tasks are ready in .forge/tasks.yaml and multiple agents will work concurrently, when assessing file-conflict risk before dispatching parallel work, when planning branch and merge sequencing for a sprint, or when prior parallel runs have caused merge nightmares.

Use when user mentions "security review", "compliance", "SOC 2", "GDPR", "PII", "threat model", when the system handles sensitive data, when preparing for an audit or certification, when assessing risk before launch, or when a STRIDE threat model is needed for a new component.

Use when creating demo data, test fixtures, seed scripts, or factory functions, when preparing for a sales demo and the screenshots are full of "John Doe", when test data is missing edge cases, or when seed scripts crash on a second run.

Use before any production deployment or release, when preparing to launch a feature, when validating release readiness, when a rollback plan is needed before shipping, or when a pre-launch gate is required before approving a deploy.

Use when starting a session, when you need to discover which forge skill applies to the current task, when uncertain which skill to invoke for a request, or when a session begins and the pipeline should be loaded.

Use when setting latency budgets per request type, when tracking LLM cost per call type, when designing a caching strategy, when reviewing bundle size, when profiling a slow path, or when a service is approaching its latency or cost SLO.

Use when .forge/prd.md and .forge/architecture.md exist and the work needs to be decomposed before implementation, when sizing tasks for a sprint, when mapping dependencies between modules, or when a critical path needs to be identified before parallel work begins.

Use when user says "redact", "clean up for sharing", "remove sensitive info", "prepare for external", when sharing .forge/ artifacts with investors or external reviewers, when sanitizing documents before external publication, or when pricing/credentials/strategy must be removed before sharing.

Use when tracking tech debt across a codebase, when planning a refactor, when deciding whether to rewrite vs incrementally improve, when a workaround has appeared in three places, or when a refactor PR is about to be combined with feature work.

Use when user asks "will this scale", "scalability", "capacity planning", "what breaks at 10x", when projecting cost at growth milestones, when identifying the next bottleneck before it hits production, or when planning a migration from monolith to distributed architecture.

Use when user wants to write a spec, create a PRD, or plan a new feature before implementation begins, when .forge/idea-brief.md exists and is ready to formalize, when requirements need to be captured before architecture or planning, or when a feature's scope and acceptance criteria need to be documented.

Use when user reports a bug, wants to file an issue, mentions "triage", when investigating a production problem before fixing it, when planning a fix that needs a TDD-shaped GitHub issue, or when a bug needs root-cause analysis before assignment.

Use when creating a new forge-skill, editing an existing skill, when planning to contribute to forge-skills, when a session has produced a one-off prompt that should be promoted to a skill, or when verifying a skill works before deployment.

Use after features are built and before shipping, when the UI needs a quality pass, when the product needs to look premium instead of functional, or when preparing for a demo or investor meeting.