aneja5

Use when checking if .forge/ artifacts are stale after a change to requirements, architecture, or any upstream artifact. Use before running /build, /review, or /ship to confirm the artifact chain is consistent. Use when the user says "is anything out of date" or "what needs to be regenerated".

Use when building UI that ships to users, when reviewing for WCAG AA compliance, when adding keyboard navigation, when ensuring screen reader support, when auditing color contrast, or when preparing a UI surface for an EU or government customer.

Use when setting latency budgets per request type, when tracking LLM cost per call type, when designing a caching strategy, when reviewing bundle size, when profiling a slow path, or when a service is approaching its latency or cost SLO.

Use when user mentions "security review", "compliance", "SOC 2", "GDPR", "PII", "threat model", when the system handles sensitive data, when preparing for an audit or certification, when assessing risk before launch, or when a STRIDE threat model is needed for a new component.

Use when something is broken, a test is failing, behavior is wrong, when investigating a production incident, when a user reports a bug, when a feature works locally but not in another environment, or when the system behaves differently than the contract specifies.

Use when starting a session, when you need to discover which forge skill applies to the current task, when uncertain which skill to invoke for a request, or when a session begins and the pipeline should be loaded.

Use when .forge/tasks.yaml exists and implementation is starting, when executing a planned task list one task at a time, when a feature must ship in independently-verifiable slices, or when contracts in .forge/contracts/ need to be implemented against acceptance criteria.

Use when implementing features or fixing bugs test-first, when user mentions "red-green-refactor", when test discipline is required for a specific task, when incremental-implementation needs TDD enforcement, or when a behavior change needs a failing test before any code is written.

Use when defining how pages are assembled from components, when establishing layout grids, when deciding responsive collapse strategies, or when multiple routes have inconsistent layouts.

Use when user reports a bug, wants to file an issue, mentions "triage", when investigating a production problem before fixing it, when planning a fix that needs a TDD-shaped GitHub issue, or when a bug needs root-cause analysis before assignment.

Use when preparing a sales demo, an investor demo, a partner walkthrough, or any scripted product flow with talking points. Use 48-72 hours before the live demo so there's time for dry-run, seed data verification, and fallback rehearsal.

Use when establishing brand foundations before any design work, when two products need to feel related, when defining voice and tone for microcopy, or when logo usage and visual identity rules need documenting.