Receber por email
← Voltar para o catálogo

pm-1on1s

Structured PM 1:1 templates by partner type — with manager, engineering manager partner, designer, IC reports — grounded in Radical Candor, the GROW coaching model, and the Manager Tools 1:1 framework.

288estrelas
Atualizado há 4 meses

Ver no GitHub ↗ Licença: NOASSERTION

Como adicionar

/plugin marketplace add borghei/Claude-Skills

O comando exato pode variar conforme o repositório. Confira o README no GitHub.

Para o autor da skill

Cole no README do seu repo

Mostra que sua skill está catalogada na Skillteca, gera backlink e tráfego rastreável.

[![Skillteca](https://www.skillteca.com.br/api/badge/pm-1on1s/svg)](https://www.skillteca.com.br/skills/pm-1on1s)

Skills relacionadas

Ver todas de Pesquisa e Web →

Alerta por categoria

Receba novas skills de Pesquisa e Web toda segunda

1 email curto, só com as skills novas de Pesquisa e Web. 4 minutos de leitura, sem spam, cancela com 1 clique.

Você confirma o email no primeiro envio. Sem spam. Cancela com 1 clique.

Ler descrição completa

PM 1:1 Expert

Overview

PMs run more 1:1s than almost any other role: with their manager, their engineering manager partner, their design lead, cross-functional partners (sales, support, data), and -- once they have reports -- with their direct PMs. Each 1:1 type has a different purpose, cadence, and ideal structure.

This skill provides templates and question banks for the most common 1:1 types a PM runs, calibrated to the PM context. It draws on Kim Scott's Radical Candor (caring personally + challenging directly), the GROW coaching model (Whitmore), the Manager Tools 1:1 framework (Auzenne & Horstman), and PM-specific 1:1 patterns popularized by Lenny Rachitsky and other senior product leaders.

When to Use

  • You are starting a new 1:1 relationship -- Use the kickoff template to set expectations.
  • Your existing 1:1s feel transactional -- Adopt the structured template to add depth.
  • You manage other PMs -- Use the direct-report template for growth and feedback conversations.
  • You partner with an EM, designer, or cross-functional lead -- Use the partner-type-specific template.

When NOT to Use

  • Ad-hoc problem-solving meetings (these are not 1:1s; treat them as project meetings).
  • Performance management conversations (use a separate, manager-led structure).
  • Initial intro meetings during onboarding -- use pm-onboarding/ for those.

Core principles for PM 1:1s

Five principles that apply across all 1:1 types:

1. The 1:1 belongs to the other person

The default for a 1:1 with your manager: their agenda first. The default for a 1:1 with your report: their agenda first. PMs often invert this and turn 1:1s into status meetings; resist that.

2. Status updates do not need a 1:1

If the conversation is "here's what's happening on project X", that's a written update. The 1:1 is for what cannot be written: trust-building, growth, judgment calls, feedback.

3. Care personally, challenge directly (Radical Candor)

The strongest 1:1 relationships combine personal care with direct challenge. Avoid the two failure modes: "ruinous empathy" (care without challenge -- you never give hard feedback) and "obnoxious aggression" (challenge without care -- feedback feels brutal).

4. Cadence matters

Weekly is the default for direct working relationships. Bi-weekly for partner-of-partner. Monthly for tier-3 stakeholders. Cancelled 1:1s are an anti-pattern; reschedule, don't skip.

5. Document agreements, not transcripts

Capture what was decided and what the next step is. Don't transcribe the whole conversation -- it kills psychological safety.

1:1 type templates

Type A: With your manager

Cadence: Weekly, 30-45 minutes.

Default agenda:

| Time | Section | Owner | |------|---------|-------| | 5 min | What's top of mind for you (your manager) | Manager | | 15-20 min | What's top of mind for me | You | | 5-10 min | Growth / longer-term discussion | Both | | 5 min | Action items + next 1:1 | You |

Your default questions for them:

  • "What feedback do you have for me from the past week?"
  • "What's worrying you that you haven't shared?"
  • "What's on your plate I could take off?"
  • "How is leadership feeling about [project / area]?"

Your default agenda items to raise:

  • One judgment call you're working through
  • One piece of feedback you have for your manager (if relevant)
  • One growth-related question
  • One people-related update (team dynamic, hire, etc.)
  • One escalation if needed

What NOT to do:

  • Read off your status update
  • Use the 1:1 to negotiate scope changes (do that async with a written proposal)
  • Bring 8 topics (3-4 is the sweet spot)

Type B: With your engineering manager partner

Cadence: Weekly, 30 minutes.

Purpose: Operational coordination, partnership health, escalations.

Default agenda:

| Time | Section | |------|---------| | 5 min | Personal check-in | | 10 min | What's happening on shared projects | | 10 min | What's worrying me / what's worrying you | | 5 min | Actions for the week |

Key questions:

  • "Is there anything I'm doing that's making your team's job harder?"
  • "Where are you over-extended right now?"
  • "What's an opinion you have about the roadmap you haven't shared yet?"
  • "Where are we mis-aligned on priorities?"

Topics to rotate weekly:

  • Roadmap and priorities
  • Team health and capacity
  • Technical debt and platform investments
  • Quality (incidents, on-call, regression)
  • Process changes
  • Hiring

Type C: With your design lead

Cadence: Weekly to bi-weekly, 30 minutes.

Purpose: Product quality, user research, craft conversations.

Default agenda:

| Time | Section | |------|---------| | 5 min | Personal check-in | | 10 min | Current designs in flight | | 10 min | User research / craft conversation | | 5 min | Actions |

Key questions:

  • "Is there a design direction we should debate that we haven't?"
  • "Where am I over- or under-specifying in PRDs?"
  • "What user research should we be running that we're not?"
  • "What's a customer pain that's nagging you?"

Type D: With a direct report (PM)

Cadence: Weekly, 45-60 minutes.

Purpose: Growth, judgment-building, feedback, blockers.

Default agenda:

| Time | Section | |------|---------| | 5 min | Personal check-in | | 20-25 min | Their topics: work, judgment calls, blockers | | 10-15 min | Growth and feedback | | 5 min | Actions + next 1:1 |

Coaching with GROW (Whitmore):

When a report brings a problem, resist the urge to solve it. Use GROW:

  • Goal -- What outcome are you trying to reach?
  • Reality -- What's the current state? What have you tried?
  • Options -- What options have you considered?
  • Way forward -- What will you do next?

GROW develops judgment. Solving problems for reports stunts their development.

Default questions for them:

  • "What's gone well this week?"
  • "What's the hardest decision you're facing?"
  • "What do you need from me?"
  • "What feedback do you have for me?"

Growth conversation cadence:

  • Monthly: deeper growth conversation tied to their growth plan
  • Quarterly: rubric calibration against the next level
  • Annually: career planning (12-24 month horizon)

Type E: With cross-functional partners (sales, support, data, marketing, legal)

Cadence: Monthly, 30 minutes (more often during launches).

Purpose: Alignment, mutual context, early-warning signal.

Default agenda:

| Time | Section | |------|---------| | 5 min | What's happening on your side | | 10 min | What's happening on my side | | 10 min | Mutual blockers / requests | | 5 min | Actions |

Key questions (rotate):

  • "What's a customer signal you're seeing that I should know about?"
  • "What's a question you've been getting that we should answer?"
  • "Where is our messaging mis-aligned with what customers experience?"
  • "What's coming up that you need from product?"

The 1:1 kickoff conversation

When starting any new 1:1 relationship, have a kickoff conversation explicitly:

  1. What this 1:1 is for -- Status? Growth? Coordination? Trust-building?
  2. Cadence and format -- Weekly? Bi-weekly? In-person? Async sometimes?
  3. Who owns the agenda -- Default = the other person, but clarify
  4. How we'll give each other feedback -- Frequency, format, examples
  5. What "good" looks like in 6 months -- Define success for the partnership

See assets/kickoff_template.md for a full script.

Feedback in 1:1s (Radical Candor)

The hardest part of any 1:1 is giving direct feedback. Kim Scott's Radical Candor framework provides a 2x2:

| | Care Personally HIGH | Care Personally LOW | |--|--|--| | Challenge Directly HIGH | Radical Candor (target) | Obnoxious Aggression (avoid) | | Challenge Directly LOW | Ruinous Empathy (avoid) | Manipulative Insincerity (avoid) |

Strong 1:1 feedback:

  • Is specific to a behavior or moment, not a generalization
  • Is timely (same week beats next month)
Compartilhar X LinkedIn